Spaceship

news Fractional Ownership And Domain Names As An Asset Class

Spaceship Spaceship
Are we approaching a time when domain names will be considered an asset class, like bonds, stocks, real estate, currencies and commodities?

Will investors be able to hold domain name investments without the need to be directly involved in buying and selling of individual domain names?

Domain names as an asset class recently took a significant step forward with the recent initial public offering of shares in the domain name Directions.com.

Domain Names As Assets

Domain names already possess many of the characteristics of an asset class. They have clear business value, and at least top-tier names are seen to be appreciating in value. There are established marketplaces where they are sold.

Escrow.com first published in 2019 their report Alternative Investing: A Comparison Between Traditional Instruments and Web Domains. The document compares holding and transaction costs, returns, volatility, and taxation considerations for domain names versus other investment classes.

Escrow.com finds that domains have generally traded positively, that is at steadily increasing prices, and with less volatility than several other asset classes. A series of quarterly reports since then has updated the Quarterly Domain Investment Index.

Nevertheless, we have never had any sort of investment market where packages of domain names are traded in the way that other assets are traded through mutual funds and exchange traded funds. That is partly because of the challenges noted in the next section.

Challenges To Domain Names As Assets

There have been several challenges to domain names achieving acceptance as an asset class.
  • Valuation The current value of stocks, bonds, commodities, real estate, etc. are generally known within small uncertainties. In the case of domain names, since each name is unique, even experts may significantly disagree on the valuation.
  • Liquidity While some domain names are more liquid than others, in general one cannot immediately sell a domain name for market value the way you can a stock, bond, currency or commodity, or even many forms of real estate.
  • Potential Legal Threats While all businesses face the possibility of legal challenges, for domain names the possibility exists that a name could be challenged the entire value lost.
  • Type Of Asset Centralized domain names are different from property, in that the registry and registrants have rights, including renewal rights, but do not own the extension or domain name as outright property, and must operate within the ICANN framework. This is less true for decentralized domain names.
None of these are absolute barriers to domain names becoming a widely traded asset class. Recently shares in a single domain name were sold in a securities commission compliant way, and that may pave the road for broader acceptance. Let’s first look at the details of that initial public offering.

The Directions.com Initial Public Offering

Shares in the domain name Directions.com were offered via the RallyRd service. The offering went public on Jan. 14, 2022. All shares in the initial public offering, $140,000 in total, were sold in only 14 minutes.

The offering was a partnership between MediaOptions and RallyRd. Individual buyers could be in for as little as a $10 share, with shares purchased through the Rally app. There were 597 investors in the initial public offering. You can track the asset at places such as Vincent.

Essentially RallyRd creates a company that is the collectable, in this case the domain name, and then issue a set number of shares in that company. You can read more on how RallyRd offerings work here.

RallyRd previously used this model to sell shares in a wide variety of items including art, vintage automobiles, collectable objects such as the first Apple I computer, trading cards, vintage wine, sports memorabilia and more. You can browse the RallyRd collections here.

Masterworks sell fractional shares in valuable works of art in a somewhat similar way.

The primary roadblock to fractional ownership of domains in the past has been SEC acceptance. Andrew Rosener, CEO and founder at MediaOptions, explained
We have worked with RallyRd to get domain names as an asset class approved by the SEC for fractional investment through public offering. We believe this is a natural evolution of the asset class and an incredible leap forward for the domain industry.

You can read the full RallyRd legal disclaimer here.

After 90 days of holding, owners can trade their shares via the app.
You can sell some or all of your shares on the Rally app through select registered broker dealers. After an asset’s Initial Offering, we impose a 90-day ‘lock-up’ period during which shares cannot be bought or sold. Once the ‘lock-up’ period is over, the INVEST button is replaced with BUY and SELL buttons so you know the asset is Trading. You can sell your shares during ‘trading windows,’ which open for each asset about every 90 days, by submitting sell orders (“ASKs”) through the app.

When the domain name sells, owners are compensated according to their share percentage, although most collectables at RallyRd are expected to be held for a long period.

The domain name directions.com previously sold for $75,000 in the 2020 NamesCon Auction. The name has a monthly search volume of about 2 million, with a cost-per-click of $0.64 currently. The domain name has been continuously registered since 1995. The Wayback Web Archive shows that the name was used for some years by a marketing and consulting firm just over a decade ago. It is likely this name was selected partially because it seems benign of potential legal challenges. It also had a recent sale, so valuation is less uncertain than for a domain name that has never previously sold.

While this is the first public offering of a name via the MediaOptions – RallyRd partnership, it won’t be the last. Andrew Rosener publicly suggested that other single names, baskets of similar names, or collections from a single sector, like health, were future possibilities.

Earlier Fractional Ownership Initiatives

There have been several earlier fractional ownership domain name initiatives. For example, Aron Meystedt described in this NamePros thread that shares in NNR.com sold out quickly. You can read the document that went with the NNR offering, that covers a number of points such as what would happen if there was a UDRP and how the decision to sell or not would be taken. You can read the NamePros announcement and discussion of the NNR offering here. In that case it was claimed the domain name was not a security.

@garptrader started a NamePros discussion on Domain Name Tokenization early in 2020.

In summer 2020 @abstractdomainer started a discussion Part Ownership: Can I Own A Part Of A Domain?

Dan Supports Fractional Ownership

Dan (then Undeveloped) had fractional ownership in mind when they developed the Domain Automation Network.
We have built WHOIS 2.0, which also supports fractional domain ownership, to make sure at all times to be able to determine instantly who is liable for the hosted content.

Have Your Say

The rapid and smooth sale of all available shares in the initial public offering has helped validate the model. Packages of domain names will be an even more interesting offering.

The fractional ownership model allows even investors with modest investment funds to be part owners of elite domain names.
  • So what do you think about fractional ownership of domain names?
  • Do you see it as the way of the future?
  • Would you like to invest that way, or do you prefer to manage your own unique portfolio?
  • If new investors enter the market through fractional ownership, without particular domain expertise, do you think that would be good or bad for domain names in general?
  • What do you think is the biggest single obstacle to domain names as an accepted alternative asset class taking off?
 
Last edited:
47
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
@Bob Hawkes , I wonder if bought 51% of all the shares of Directions.com from other investors. Technically I control the domain, but not owning the share of the company (RallyRD) who owns the domain. Is there any information what will happen, can I decide everything about the domain?
 
Last edited:
3
•••
@Bob Hawkes , I wonder if bought 51% of all the shares of Directions.com from other investors. Technically I control the domain, but not owning the share of the company (RallyRD) who owns the domain. Is there any information what will happen, can I decide everything about the domain?
My theory is they have only offered up 49% of shares to avoid this potential situation.
 
4
•••
Well, and maybe I'm just really dumb, but if a company has 100 shares priced at $10 a piece, then that company is worth $1000, no?
In a heavily traded stock, that is how capitalization is calculated. Does that mean a company whose stock has gone down 50% in last few months is worth half what it was? In some senses, yes. Of course there are other measures of company worth that are not as volatile as capitalization.

Here the question is are most of the share holders willing to sell at today's price? If so, that is a valid estimate of worth. But if only one holder of a few shares wants to generate some cash and is willing to get out at this price, it is not necessarily a good estimate of what it would take to buy all shares and control the asset. Of course if no one else buys at that rate, is some indication people don't think it is worth more.

I don't know if there is an easy way to follow RallyRd ask prices over an extended period. I don't use the service personally, and had not checked the price until you mentioned.

If there were more domains listed, would be an interesting metric of how the worth of high value .com might be changing.

Thanks for your insights.

Bob
 
3
•••
it must create a company first who own a domain or some domains. The share can't not be on the domain, but on the company who owns the domain/domains.
My understanding is that is exactly how they get around securities regulations. They create a company for each product, the domain name in this case, the collectable or art in other holdings. That is the only asset or activity of the company.

A previous case (not at RallyRd) parking monetization was generated, and distributed like dividends, but that is not done in this domain.

-Bob
 
3
•••
I am not totally clear re voting rights and input re decisions, in this case. They were spelled out in the NNR document, and yes you had voting rights and there was a maximum any one person could own so one or two people could not control. In the case of RallyRd the legal disclaimer document I link in the article says the following. Since if the domain sells the business, which is just to own the domain, ceases, I take it that one is probably granting to RallyRd management rights. It is an important consideration.

"a buyer of shares grants to the manager of Rally Entities, RSE Markets, Inc., a power of attorney to, among other things, execute and file documents required for the Rally Entity’s qualification, continuance or dissolution. "

@Bob Hawkes , I wonder if bought 51% of all the shares of Directions.com from other investors. Technically I control the domain, but not owning the share of the company (RallyRD) who owns the domain. Is there any information what will happen, can I decide everything about the domain?

I am not absolutely clear, but see my comment just above from earlier.

You can read the RallyRd disclaimer here: https://rallyrd.com/disclaimer/

-Bob
 
2
•••
Fractional ownership can happen like this. There is a trusted registrar, who will appear as admin contact all the time, until someone buys all the shares. Domain won't be used unless there is a special agreement. Then anyone can buy/sell shares just like in stockmarket. I add a new rule, which can be applied to stockmarket as well.
If I decide that a share is worth x dollars (just my opinion), then I have to buy if a share is offered for x/2 dollars, and have to sell if someone wants to buy for 2x dollars. I think, maybe this way abuses can be prevented. You can create a casino game based on such rules, and no real thing to invest in.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
My understanding is that is exactly how they get around securities regulations. They create a company for each product, the domain name in this case, the collectable or art in other holdings. That is the only asset or activity of the company.

A previous case (not at RallyRd) parking monetization was generated, and distributed like dividends, but that is not done in this domain.

-Bob
The questions from my first post largely remain unanswered, at least to my satisfaction.

To me it is not clear what you are actually even buying.

Brad
 
3
•••
My understanding is that is exactly how they get around securities regulations. They create a company for each product, the domain name in this case, the collectable or art in other holdings. That is the only asset or activity of the company.

A previous case (not at RallyRd) parking monetization was generated, and distributed like dividends, but that is not done in this domain.

-Bob

It seems the company is not created specialy for 1 domain here. If yes, why don't they sell the company share, but still only sell share of the domain.

What"s the difference? If they sell only the domain share, you can't be a board of company even if you have 20% of the domain"s share. So you have no rights to vote in decision even you have 20% of domain"s share.

If the company is specialized to collectively buying the domain, and you sell the company share, every 20% individual or collective investors can has 1 person as board of company. So investors are able to directly involve in controling the decision. Every decision must be agreed by investors through board meeting.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
2
•••
It seems the company is not created specialy for 1 domain here. If yes, why don't they sell the company share, but still only sell share of the domain.

What"s the difference? If they sell only the domain share, you can't be a board of company even if you have 20% of the domain"s share. So you have no rights to vote in decision even you have 20% of domain"s share.

If the company is specialized to collectively buying the domain, and you sell the company share, every 20% individual or collective investors can has 1 person as board of company. So investors are able to directly involve in controling the decision. Every decision must be agreed by investors through board meeting.
Yeah, that is one of my primary questions. What are the actual benefits of "ownership" of these shares?

Who is actually managing the domain and making the decisions? Who decides what is done with the domain? If the domain gets an offer, then what?

Do the shareholders vote in a proportional ratio to the % of shares they own?

What if there is a UDRP?

Who pays to defend it? What if the domain is lost?

How this all works is rather unclear.

Brad
 
Last edited:
5
•••
If yes, why don't they sell the company share, but still only sell share of the domain.
They do that as I understand it. You buy shares in a company legally created by RallyRd. That company has only one function: to own the domain name, and at some point sell it. After a waiting period RallyRd allow you to buy or sell shares to others on their app, but the total number of shares does not change. But to answer your point you are buying shares in the company that owns the domain name, not the domain name.
-Bob
 
Last edited:
2
•••
They do that as I understand it. You buy shares in a company legally created by RallyRd. That company has only one function: to own the domain name, and at some point sell it. After a waiting period RallyRd allow you to buy or sell shares to others on their app, but the total number of shares does not change. But to answer your point you are buying shares in the company that owns the domain name, not the domain name.
-Bob

If RallyRD has created special company for this domain, suppose to be not involve in the company decision. RalkyRD and the company are diference entities.

If yes a company ctreated specialized for the domain, the board of company has to be investors with their proportional share. Let"s say, 49 % of share are sold to public, public can collectively gathers to have 2 persons as board of company. And every decision has to be agreed by investors through board meeting.
 
2
•••
"traffic" of value by domain(s) could be in the world seen as an entirely different elite asset class in itself IMO

why I dreamt:

my wwwcsdn.net "is worth millions"
(its expected everydays)
"where the real money is at"

- Dennis Zabala
 
0
•••
Let me make a bold prediction: within 3 years we will have a Domain Investment Trust (DIT), publicly traded, on the same model as REITs. And once we have one, we will have many, with different regional, TLD and sector emphasis, some well diversified, some very specialized, like a DIT just for aspects of space exploration, for example. Someone can please remind me in 3 years that I was wrong.
The Boys GIF by First We Feast
 
5
•••
Important to realize that it is not that the resource sold at a 2/3 loss, but rather the most recent trading of 'shares' is at that level. Depending on how thinly traded shares have been, and how volatile the price of sold shares, that may, or may not, be significant.

Okay.

Meanwhile, back in the reality where this was an obvious sucker play from the get-go... I had posted the price of $3.15, down from the initial offering price of $10, back in October 2022.

It's now March 2025.... and no one who bought into this scam has yet to make a dime:

Screenshot 2025-03-04 at 4.24.26 PM.png
 
8
•••
It's now March 2025.... and no one who bought into this scam has yet to make a dime:

That's what everyone needs to remember - all these 'new twists on investing" are just scams to steal your hard-earned money. It's always the same old scam dressed up in a new costume.

Why anyone would put a penny into this blatant cash-grab truly boggles my mind.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
4
•••
What's most amusing about a scam like this is:

Where is the incentive to ever sell the domain?

If RallyRD actually sold the domain, then they would a) lose the domain and b) have give back 49% of all the sweet, sweet inflated investment cash. If they hold the domain forever, and with 51% ownership they can, then that money remains theirs forever and the stockholders run around scrabbling to get $3-$6 back on their $10 investment.

Hilarious.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
John are you against all fractional ownership John or just how RallyRD does it?

What makes you think I'm "against" anything?

@Bob Hawkes made a three-year prediction in January 2022 and asked to be reminded if he was wrong.

I am John's total lack of surprise.

I will never, as long as I live, understand why people argue about whether something is or is not a good investment. What is the point? I don't care what you do with your money.

Quite obviously, the only person who has ever made any serious money on fractional domain ownership are the people who have made their domain names available for these schemes. There may be some people who have gotten in and out on small bounces, but it is obvious as hell that no buyer of any shares at the initial offer price has made a single penny on any one of them.

But I'm not "against" anything you want to do. If you like watching your money spin around the toilet bowl - and, sure, it's fun to watch - then go for it. You have my blessing.

So, it seems like a dumb idea to me. Am I "against" dumb ideas? No, as long as they don't involve me, I'm totally down to watch people do what I think are dumb things. This "investment" was dubious to begin with and was heavily promoted by insiders. Oh, gee, where have I ever seen that before. Maybe its just a curse of getting old.

And, oh yeah, tell me again how .eth names are going to be what everyone uses for everything because of all of the wonderful things they do. How many years is that going to go on? Because it sure as hell rhymes with the alt root stuff from the late 90's.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Where is the incentive to ever sell the domain?

Ding, ding, ding, ding...

I would contrast it with stocks, where at least the shareholders get to vote on things, but the State of Delaware is getting rid of that too.
 
1
•••
but it is obvious as hell that no buyer of any shares at the initial offer price has made a single penny on any one of them.

…and if anyone ever made a dime investing in these things, you’d surely hear them going on about it.

But you don’t see that, do you? The only thing you see are the promoters of these things going on about how it is a revolutionary investment opportunity.

For a brief period a few years ago, you’d think it was the greatest idea in the history of humanity.

Now?

Tumbleweed GIF
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Ding, ding, ding, ding...

I would contrast it with stocks, where at least the shareholders get to vote on things, but the State of Delaware is getting rid of that too.
One of the sales pitches about fractional domain ownership is turning relatively illiquid assets like domains into easily tradeable liquid assets like stocks.

However, it doesn't seem like these fractional shares are really all that liquid.

These appear to be the current buy offers on Directions.com -

https://app.rallyrd.com/app/assets/...71e/9d9690ee-0886-4c32-bf96-8bce27aeea38/view

10 x 3.25
5 x 3.05
1 x 2.95
100 x 0.05

That's a total of like $50 in buy offers.

Brad
 
Last edited:
3
•••
One of the sales pitches about fractional domain ownership is turning relatively illiquid assets like domains into easily tradeable liquid assets like stocks.

However, it doesn't seem like these fractional shares are really all that liquid.

These appear to be the current buy offers on Directions.com -

https://app.rallyrd.com/app/assets/...71e/9d9690ee-0886-4c32-bf96-8bce27aeea38/view

10 x 3.25
5 x 3.05
1 x 2.95
100 x 0.05

That's a total of like $50 in buy offers.

Brad
The problem with suckers is that you'll eventually run out of them.
 
3
•••
That's a total of like $50 in buy offers.

And those buy offers are 50% off what the sell offers are so miles off being a truely liquid market.

Part of the issue is marketing / awareness, I never think about Rally until someone mentions them. Other than that they simply don't exist or pop up anywhere.

Their platform also sucks from a UI/UX perspective. It's clunky, uses a weird custom layout not found anywhere else on the Internet, and a bit slow.
 
6
•••
Part of the issue is marketing / awareness, I never think about Rally until someone mentions them. Other than that they simply don't exist or pop up anywhere.

Their platform also sucks from a UI/UX perspective. It's clunky, uses a weird custom layout not found anywhere else on the Internet, and a bit slow.
The platform does suck, but at the same time the product is the issue as well.

I could see fractionalized ownership of a dividend generating asset like real estate.

I will never buy into the fractionalized ownership of everything model.

I am not sure it would make much difference if you could trade these shares in your Schwab or Fidelity account. :ROFL:

Brad
 
6
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back