Dynadot

domains Best Startups; Worst Domains?

Spaceship Spaceship
When you start a company, there are a thousand things to do. Often times, the domain name is the last thing on the list. That can be a huge mistake, and I wrote an entire article about it.

As a rule of thumb, startups do best when they launch with a dot com that passes the radio test and is an exact match for their brand.

I was thinking about this as I read a Business Insider article. It was a list of the top startups of 2015 as of May 19th. Let's take a look at the list of company names and their respective domain names.


HungryRoot / HungryRoot.com
Bingo! This food subscription service hit the broccoli right on the head! They got an exact match, dot com, domain name. Hats off to them!


Periscope / PeriscopeApp.tv
OK, here’s the other side of the coin. In my opinion, this company made some mistakes in their branding and domain decisions.
  1. Periscope is a colorful word but it’s prone to misspelling.
  2. Their slogan “see the world through the eyes of others” is nice, but when I hear ‘periscope’ it makes me think of submarines.
  3. They used the domain extention (TLD) for the country Tuvalu (population 12,000). That might be OK for a TV station or a video production company, but I don’t think it works for them.
  4. Finally, they added ‘app’ to their domain name. Ugh!
    (After Business Insider's article was published, Periscope "upgraded" their domain name to Periscope.tv.)

The League / TheLeague.com
This NYC dating service app got it right. My hat’s off to the smart lady that runs this rather male-oriented website and coed service.


Gogoro / Gogoro.com
This electric scooter company did well. They found an affordable exact match in a dot com. It’s not so hard with an invented company name. That’s the reason we have them, and brandable domainers will note that they chose the popular 6 letter, CVCVCV pattern.


Ride / Ride.com
Kudos to this ride sharing app startup. They got a category-killer brandable in the dot com extension. Way to go!


Honor / JoinHonor.com
This one’s a mixed bag. This elderly caregiver startup got the dot com right, but I question their “join” add-on. Customers won’t remember if it’s GoHonor, GetHonor, TryHonor, or JoinHonor. And why the word ‘join’ anyway? It’s a service, not a club, right?


Eero / Eero.com
This is a WiFi product that chose a four-letter play on the word ‘ear’ and got the exact match dot com. However, I’m still lukewarm on this one, because the words ‘ear’ and ‘WiFi‘ don’t have an obvious connection for me.
(Update: View comments below.)


Even / WhatIsEven.com
This is a terrible domain choice for this financial app startup. Since inception, they’ve made an upgrade to Even.me but I’m not sure that’s any better.


Jet / Jet.com
This startup hits it out of the park! You won’t find a better brand and domain than Jet.com. This online shopping company has some big funding behind it. The domain was bought via a private sale in 2014. The price is unknown but industry insiders are speculating that it sold in the seven figures.


M. Gemi / Mgemi.com
If you’re a fashion startup, you don’t need to worry. Just use the founders personal name. It worked for Versace, Chanel, Calvin Klein, and Ralph Lauren. So why not here too? Also, personal names are often available for registration, making it easy to acquire the exact match dot com.


MeerKat / MeerKatApp.co
These folks tried to be playful and unique, but I’m not sure it works. They chose the name of an obscure animal that no one knows how to spell, and then they added ‘app’ to their dot co domain to make matters worse. Ouch!


21 / 21.co
The domain 21.com would cost millions, if it even was for sale. It would seem like they could have gotten TwentyOne.com instead, which is currently a landing page that forwards to an adult content site. I'm not sure why they chose the dot co.


Vive / Vive.co
This hair salon start up couldn’t get Vive.com since its being used by an international phone service, but is Vive so perfect a brand that it counteracts the dragging influence of a dot co extension? It's also similar to Vine, a popular video sharing app by Twitter, that operates on a dot co as well.


Summary
Jet.com and Ride.com are the kinds of domains that most startups (and even established companies) can only dream of. Kudos to HungryRoot, Gogoro, and The League as well. They got it right in my opinion. The rest are left to their own devices. Mobile devices that is.

What do you think?

Which startup (domain) names do you like the most and least?
 
13
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
They aren't very credible if they don't understand that Periscope is ONLY an app and is exactly like watching a TV. Clearly they aren't very clued into the cultural phenomenon that is Periscope.
 
1
•••
Our fearless Admin, Eric Lyons, mentioned that he thought Eero was a play on the word Aero. Likely he is right. However it's not a good play since their brand sounds like 'ear' and the connection to Aero (which makes more sense for a wireless company) is not obvious. Hopefully they'll upgrade to a better name when they have more funds.
 
0
•••
Indian start-up - Quikr.

It is not quicker or even Quiker.
 
1
•••
21.co is far far better choice than twentyone.com since its a two number and an asset. They can choose to get twentyone.com but I think they are all set.
Great article Keith.
 
2
•••
Periscope.TV is a spot on name for this company. No matter where you are in the world you can SEE what is being streamed. A submarine can't visually see what is around without it's Periscope. This is the correlation that makes the name absolutely perfect. They nailed it.

21.co is actually called 21 Inc. and this is probably why they chose the .co to represent the word Company.

Vive.co is not bad. When the com is either over-priced or the .com is being used by an entirely different type of company then using an alternate extension works sometimes.

Ride and Jet are incredible names. I would put Jet as one of my top 10 favorite words to use for a brand.

MeerKatApp.co is just ridiculous.
 
5
•••
Spot on! jet.com is an average US only coupon site, could have localised with an available us and also saved a TON of money.
 
1
•••
periscope.tv is too long for mobile.
vine.co is much better.
 
1
•••
I even saw a .TV for a Android Game.. OMG WTF
 
0
•••
Ride,Jet & The league seems to have obviously got it right.
Hungry Root,though have got heir abstract element right & one can imagine the logo right away,the name doesn't seem to have the stand out appeal amongst other food subscription services.We already have a Panda with voracious appetite(foodpanda),this seems to project the image a gluttonous root.
Gogoro,seems to want to project a Fun & Energetic Vibe with 'GoGo' to go with the electric scooter image but,the name sounds more 'Fun' without enough spark on the 'Energetic' or 'Zestful' aspect.
 
1
•••
Keith DeBoer, I must thank you for writing such condensed info to the community and also trying to educate end-users.
 
1
•••
I believe some often forget that in the end for a company there is a product to sell, not a domain to market ... the most fancy domain name is worth nothing if you can't sell your product ... websites are there to inform the people interested in your product in the first place ... so as far as domain names the only thing that counts is "remarkable" ... and then you might look at all that google stuff ... but especially when you establish a new product or app that isn't on the market yet, what "google keyword data" should there be ? ... this list proves it I believe and because of that the high price domain market will turn into a "brand market" in a way, and not based on keywords so strong ... at least for .COM's ...
 
0
•••
Great post Keith (as always). Thanks for sharing.

Best,
Paul
 
1
•••
21 / 21.co
The domain 21.com would cost millions, if it even was for sale. It would seem like they could have gotten TwentyOne.com instead, which is currently a landing page that forwards to an adult content site. I'm not sure why they chose the dot co.

Using 21.co is the better decision here. They made the right call, especially for the product which is getting terrible reviews right now. If the product took off and was a huge success, they would just buy 21.com and millions would be no big deal.
 
0
•••
As they say, save money at the beginning with a wrong choice costs you dearly later when you save to rebrand.
 
1
•••
As they say, save money at the beginning with a wrong choice costs you dearly later when you save to rebrand.

Yes the cost of rebranding can be immense. For anyone that's interested in this topic I highly recommend this interview at Domain Sherpa with a Jamie Siminoff, the founder of DoorBot. Jamie was turned down for investors at SharkTank but went on to great success. One of the key ingredients was upgrading from the domain name GetDoorBot.com to Ring.com and how it was both the highest risk and most profitable investment he's ever made.
 
2
•••
Great, article. I unfortunately learned the hard way many years ago when trying to start a business. I registered the name artsEfest.com and no one could spell it when I pronounced it. It was a lesson learned.

With that said, I am currently in the process of launching a Political Trivia app that follows the U.S. presidential elections. In this case the app is called Political Run and I was able to secure PoliticalRun.us

.com was not available, but going with the .us seemed very fitting when this related to U.S. politics.
 
1
•••
Great, article. I unfortunately learned the hard way many years ago when trying to start a business. I registered the name artsEfest.com and no one could spell it when I pronounced it. It was a lesson learned.

With that said, I am currently in the process of launching a Political Trivia app that follows the U.S. presidential elections. In this case the app is called Political Run and I was able to secure PoliticalRun.us

.com was not available, but going with the .us seemed very fitting when this related to U.S. politics.

Thanks for the first hand insights! Good luck with your new venture!
 
0
•••
Periscope.TV is a spot on name for this company. No matter where you are in the world you can SEE what is being streamed. A submarine can't visually see what is around without it's Periscope. This is the correlation that makes the name absolutely perfect. They nailed it.
I agree. For this particular app, since it used for live streaming (much like watching television), I think the .tv extension works perfectly.

Interesting article over all @Keith DeBoer
 
1
•••
periscope.tv is too long for mobile.

Maybe not if it's bookmarked.

And Maybe not if you have an app to view recorded videos anyway. Periscope.tv is only for archived videos and most of them get deleted after 24hours. I believe the window for deletion can be longer depending on the broadcaster but if users are subscribed to lots of folks on this app, you basically won't bother keeping track of archived videos unless you're a diehard follower. There's really not much need to go to their .tv for catching up cause there's something new to look at. Some of them upload to youtube too most likely and one can easily update their followers using Twitter. Guess that's the beauty of social media integrating with other social media.

Also, I believe they're sort of partnered with Katch.me which is a short hack (except for that K), easily pronounceable and spelled. Here, one can view freshly broadcasts as well.
 
0
•••
*...there's always something new to look at being on the app alone. (I realized there's no edit option here, odd.)
 
0
•••
Thanks for the insights and comments everyone! Keep em comin! :xf.cool:
 
0
•••
The Tribune company sold it's rights to cars.com, and now use carquick.com. even carclick.com would have been better. They obviously failed the radio test, Anyways their traffic is dismal although they market it heavily. they need to fire their internet people. Imo
 
2
•••
1
•••
Hungry Root might have an exact match domain, but the brand name still sucks.
 
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back