Dynadot

information A Selection of Data Recently Released by Several Registrars

Spaceship Spaceship
Recently Namecheap released their 2024 Domain Insights & Trends Report. You can read a summary of the report online, or download the full report at this link.

As well as present some highlights from that report, I also include in this article insights recently shared by Todd Han, CEO of Dynadot, through his DynaTodd X account, as well as GoDaddy release of new top keyword data from Afternic.

Who Are The Big Registrars?

Below are the top 5 registrars in terms of number of domain names under management, as shard by Todd Hann of Dynadot a couple of weeks ago.
  • GoDaddy 89.8 million, 11.5%
  • Namecheap 23.6 million, 3.0%
  • Tucows 13.4 million, 1.7%
  • Squarespace 9.6 million, 1.2%
  • Dynadot 7.1 million, 0.9%
While GoDaddy is by far the largest, it should be noted that it still only represents about 11.5% of total global registrations. The thousands of ICANN accredited registrars may each be relatively small, but together they account for a lot of registrations. You can be in the top 5 registrars in the world, while still having only about 1% of total registrations.

2024 Namecheap Registration by Extension

It is no surprise that .com was the most registered TLD at Namecheap during 2024, with just under 3.7 million registrations. About 39% of Namecheap domain registrations from 2024 were in .com. That is slightly down from 2023 data, but I am not sure if the decrease is statistically significant.

I was somewhat surprised that three different new extensions, .shop, .xyz and .site, all had more registrations than the legacy extensions .org, .info or .net at Namecheap. Below is a graphic of the entire top 20 from their report.

Image-TLD-numbers.jpg

The most-registered domain extension at Namecheap during 2024. Data and image provided by Namecheap 2024 Domain Insights and Trends Report.

Many of the extensions on the above list are sharply discounted for first year which can really impact registration numbers.

Also, we should not place too much emphasis on what is seen at any one registrar, since the relative pricing across different registrars can impact registration numbers pretty dramatically, even with the difference is just pennies.

Most investors use price comparison tools, such as
and many will, if they are happy with other aspects, register domain names where the pricers are most competitive, even if the differences are rather small.

You can get a better handle on registration data overall by looking at sites such as nTLD Stats. nTLD Stats gives the breakdown for each TLD by registrar. For example, for .shop, Namecheap is the top registrar, with GoDaddy second.

nTLD Stats only covers new domain extensions, but the following sites cover all extensions:
We see right away big differences from the Namecheap 2024 registration data and the industry-wide numbers. While .shop was the second most-registered extension in the Namecheap report, .de, .org, .net, .cn and numerous others had more registrations than .shop in the DomainTools data.

Are Namecheap Customers Mainly Investors?

One of the most interesting insights from the Namecheap report was the breakdown of number of domains held per client. I was somewhat surprised to see that 59.4% of Namecheap customers have a single domain name, at least at Namecheap, and only 2.2% of customers have more than 25 domains registered at Namecheap, and just 0.4% have more than 100 domain names there. The following graphic shows the actual numbers.

Image-NC-OwnerBreakdown.jpg

Only 0.4% of Namecheap customers have more than 100 domain names registered at Namecheap, and just over 59% of Namecheap customers have only a single domain name there. Data and image provided by Namecheap 2024 Domain Insights and Trends Report.

It the vast majority of Namecheap customers are domain users, this means that a significant number of potential clients for aftermarket names may be among site users, something important for investors.

It should be kept in mind that these are the statistics just for domains held at Namecheap. For example, although I currently have fewer than 100 domains at Namecheap, the total number of domains I have somewhere is far more. I think most investors use at least a few different registrars.

Namecheap Auctions

Namecheap now auction expired domain names that were registered at Namecheap, as well as from their companion registrar Spaceship. They shared data in the annual report with respect to auctions, including that 104,411 domain names sold in auction at Namecheap during 2024, with the top sale being telepath.com that sold for $100,501.

.XYZ At Dynadot

Todd Han, Dynadot CEO, shared a glimpse of extensions with considerable traction. One extension that he shared on X was the number of .xyz registrations at Dynadot. Although there have been a couple of bumps, for the most part the extension has shown strong registration growth since 2018 that continues.
Image-Dynadot-XYZ.jpg

Plot of .xyz domains registered at Dynadot, with data shared on X by CEO Todd Han.

You can see the overall .XYZ registration plot at nTLD Stats. Currently Dynadot is the fourth-highest registrar for .xyz, trailing Namecheap, GoDaddy and GMO.

The .CC Rush at Dynadot

Todd also shared a registration plot for .cc. Todd described registrations as “through the roof”, and asked for insights on what was driving the registrations. I don’t have a good answer to that, as it does not appear that there has been a dramatic increase in aftermarket sales volume in the extension, where many sales are for short numerics.
Image-Dynadot-CC.jpg

Plot of .cc domains registered at Dynadot, with data shared on X by CEO Todd Han.

Dynadot had 281,857 .cc domains registered the day the data was shared. Those were held among 5645 accounts, for an average of about 50 .cc domains per account.

Afternic Monthly Popular Keywords

Each month Afternic shares the top keywords for domains recently sold. This week, keyword data for October 2024 was released.
Image-Afternic-Keywords.jpg

Top keyword data at Afternic for October 2024. Words like ‘the’ have been filtered out.

My and AI are always near the top, and this month was no exception. Recently @James Iles did a nice analysis: What we can learn after nearly 2 years of keyword chart releases?. He found that the following keywords appeared in every, or almost every, monthly set.
Image-Afternic-Recurring.jpg

Keywords that repeat on the top list almost every month. Data is from an article What we can learn after nearly 2 years of keyword chart releases? written by @James Iles and published on the Afternic Blog.

If you want to look back at previous months of Afternic keyword data, there is an archive here.
 
Last edited:
37
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
One of the most interesting insights from the Namecheap report was the breakdown of number of domains held per client. I was somewhat surprised to see that 59.4% of Namecheap customers have a single domain name, at least at Namecheap, and only 2.2% of customers have more than 25 domains registered at Namecheap, and just 0.4% have more than 100 domain names there. The following graphic shows the actual numbers (see above).

If the vast majority of Namecheap customers are domain users, this means that a significant number of potential clients for aftermarket names may be among site users, something important for investors.
Another job well done by Bob!

I’m not sure if I’m understanding your assumption correctly. Can we infer from this data that individuals building websites or launching companies who need a domain name are ready to skip the aftermarket and simply pay the registration fee for an available name?
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Pro being a top keyword makes me wonder when .Pro is going to take off.
 
2
•••
1
•••
Can we infer from this data that individuals building websites or launching companies who need a domain name are ready to skip the aftermarket and simply pay the registration fee for an available name?
No that was not what I meant. I was referencing aftermarket name sales not hand registrations, although Namecheap offer both, of course.

Namecheap displays both the Afternic and Sedo aftermarket names, for Sedo not just the MLS-eligible ones but all. Anyone that types one of these names into Namecheap search will be presented with the price, renewal rate, and an add to cart button. They can readily buy from the service provider they already use. Of course the same is true of all of the partners in the network, but after GoDaddy, Namecheap is the most important network partner.

With 2.2 million Namecheap users, according to the report cited in this article, having only a single name, and more than a million more Namecheap users with just a few names, there are many potential business owners and site operators that at some stage may be looking to either start a new business or upgrade.

In the article What Is The Path To Most Domain Sales?, with data from @Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames, it was found that from the 46% of sales that came via the Aftenic network, about 30% from GoDaddy, about 7% from Namecheap, and about 9% from all other partners in the network combined. The Namecheap and GoDaddy search paths are immensely important for aftermarket name sales via the networks.

Just so no confusion re what I said about Sedo names appearing on Namecheap, the Sedo inventory can be purchased at Namecheap, but Namecheap is not a Sedo partner for purposes of registration, so your Namecheap registered domain names will not be eligible for Sedo MLS.

-Bob
 
2
•••
59.4% of Namecheap customers have a single domain name
No that was not what I meant. I was referencing aftermarket name sales not hand registrations, although Namecheap offer both, of course.
Oh, got it. What makes up that 59%—aftermarket purchases versus registrations?
 
1
•••
...The Namecheap and GoDaddy search paths are immensely important for aftermarket name sales via the networks...
I have not enabled Boost, for all the reasons we've all discussed here. But does what you are saying make the case for Boost? I still am unsure if there is really a difference in the search paths, with and without Boost. If there was a consistent and dramatic difference (and if I could turn off outbound marketing), I'd consider it. I don't mind the 20% rather than 15% if it resulted in new sales.
 
2
•••
Pro being a top keyword makes me wonder when .Pro is going to take off.
It has (albeit in fits and starts), mostly led by Swetha (who owns over a thousand names in that extension).
.Pro names often get bid up in auction.
 
2
•••
Oh, got it. What makes up that 59%—aftermarket purchases versus registrations?
The data from @Nikul Sanghvi (keep in mind one portfolio, but a quality one, and over a number of years of sales) suggested that 48% of sales seem to come directly from the landers (in his case Dan mainly landers). The other 6% was a mix of various ways including contacts by social media or outreach from a broker, etc.

-Bob
 
2
•••
But does what you are saying make the case for Boost? I still am unsure if there is really a difference in the search paths, with and without Boost.
Boost does not change what happens at partners on the network, so for example your name's exposure at Namecheap will not change.

However, since GD itself accounts for so much of Afternic network performance, then Boost could make a significant difference. I think whether worth the extra might depend on the type of portfolio. Names getting shown in search will be assisted by FT extensions, especially .com, it seems. On the other hand, if one has a lot of alternative country code domains, other than .io and .co, it is not clear to me if Boost helps at all.

Those with high-quality .com names probably also would benefit from the email marketing included with Boost. I have received some of these, where I had less desireable TLDs in the term, and they seem well implemented.

I wish you could add Boost for certain names, but understand that would be complex to manage. An option we all have is to try Boost for a period of time, and see if there seems to be a difference.

So no simple answer.

-Bob
 
1
•••
Those with high-quality .com names probably also would benefit from the email marketing included with Boost. I have received some of these, where I had less desireable TLDs in the term, and they seem well implemented.
Do you have any concerns over potential trademark issues with the outbound email marketing? Are there ads on the emails that related to your domain name? Have you seen any of these emails? I'd love to see one.
 
2
•••
Do you have any concerns over potential trademark issues with the outbound email marketing? Are there ads on the emails that related to your domain name? Have you seen any of these emails? I'd love to see one.
I've **** ed out the name, and the original message had graphics, but below is one I got this week. I own the singular two-word term in a not great extension, the name registered at GoDaddy. They promoted to me, I presume from someone's boosted account, the plural .com of the name that is on aftermarket.
=============
You already own
*****.***
Grow your online brand with​
*********.com​
Make It Yours
Button Arrow
Invest in a premium domain* to show up and stand out.
Checkmark
A memorable domain easily promotes the name of your business or website.
Checkmark
Premium domains offer plenty of opportunity to enhance your online presence.
Checkmark
They're also a smart business investment, holding value for potential resale.
Be seen in all the right places with
*****.com

In this particular case the term is a generic one (about 30 million results in quotation mark search), not tied to any one company, so no hazard to the domain owner.

Could there be cases where it would be? Possibly. It is likely these are generated algorithmically. While wording is pretty generic, I don't think message itself adds risk, but reaching out to the wrong company is always possible I guess.

I suspect that many of the outreach end up with domain investors, most of which will not help sell a name retail. But with so many customers, I bet some of them do result in a sale. I presume they are tracking clicks on the links in the message, and what the click rate and the sell rate are would be interesting to know, but I doubt they would share that data.

I have not kept records and tend to delete them, but have perhaps got one or two dozen of these over the boost period, for different names of course.

-Bob

PS I think it highly likely that GD has some sort of risk filter and are not sending out emails on names perceived to have any significant risk, but I don't know for sure, of course.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Curious how many NC users renew their .shop domains at $25..
 
1
•••
2
•••
Curious how many NC users renew their .shop domains at $25..
I suspect not many, with high ratio of renewal cost to first year cost.

The report does give the TLDs with highest retention rates (.shop not on list), but I did not include it in this report, since it only shows renewal at Namecheap, it is somewhat deceptive.

For what it is worth, the extensions with the highest renewal at Namecheap rates were .dev, .ca, .app, .io, .gg, .tv, .org, .net, .com and .in, in that order. The renewal rate for .dev was 57% and .com 32%. But Verisign show higher renewal rates, so I think it is just people transfer some out so does not show as Namecheap renewal.

-Bob

PS Here is the Namecheap renewal rate data for 2024 from the report:
RenewalRateNC2024.jpg
 
Last edited:
2
•••
For what it is worth, the extensions with the highest renewal at Namecheap rates were .dev, .ca, .app, .io, .gg, .tv, .org, .net, .com and .in, in that order. The renewal rate for .dev was 57% and .com 32%. But Verisign show higher renewal rates, so I think it is just people transfer some out so does not show as Namecheap renewal.

I think this is definitely true. I know when I win names at auction at Namecheap, dynadot, et al, I transfer to Godaddy every name that is up for renewal, for consolidation purposes. Whether it's Godaddy or another registrar as one's "home registrar," I would think this is widespread. I would imagine that nearly no one likes to have to manage names at too many registrars.
 
2
•••
Bob Hawkes for MVP!

Most Valued Poster!

Visit his posts & see why!!

Tx Bob.
 
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back