Dynadot

information A Deeper Look At Domain Name Fast Transfer Sales Networks

Spaceship Spaceship
What if your domain names would be seen at many different registrars? In addition, when a name sold through any of those registrars, the entire transfer process was automatic. You just wait to be paid.

That is the promise of the so-called fast transfer networks. Traditionally there have been two main networks, Afternic Fast Transfer (FT), part of GoDaddy, and the Sedo MLS.

Dan introduced their own registrar distribution network some time ago, and announced this week that names listed on that network would now be part of Afternic.

So let’s have a look at how to get on the fast transfer networks, and the differences between the Afternic Premium Network and Sedo MLS.

The Basic Idea

The basic idea is that you agree in advance to sale and transfer of the name. This means the buyer places the domain name in their cart, at any network registrar, makes the purchase, and are guaranteed delivery of the domain name.

A name needs to have a buy-it-now price to qualify, and the maximum price for the Afternic FT network is $100,000.

The domain name must not be expired and not within the first 60 days after registration, or otherwise subject to a lock.

I covered the basics of fast transfer networks in Part 2 of Domain Investing Just the Basics.

Registration stream networks were an important part of The Many Ways People Might Discover Your Domain Name.

The Networks

Some registrars are part of Afternic Fast Transfer, also called the Afternic Premium Reseller Network, while others are part of Sedo MLS, and some are members of both.

Afternic promote all listed names, whether fast transfer enabled or not, on a smaller standard network of registrars and other partners.

The primary reason to be on the networks is not because the transfer and payment is faster, in many cases it is not. Rather it is that your name appears at a larger number of registrars.

I reached out to an Afternic representative, and they confirmed the listing of premium network registrars at this link was accurate. Your Fast Transfer enabled name will be listed as available for sale at these networks. To see where your domain must be registered to be eligible for Fast Transfer, you will need to click the green fast-transfer registrars link and a pop-up of eligible registrars will appear.

The best way to know which registrars are part of the Sedo MLS program is to open your Sedo account, pretend you are going to change the registrar on a name, and the first section of the pulldown list, registrar names preceded by an S in square brackets, are the MLS eligible registrars. Sedo also promote their names at a larger group of registrars, but in order for it to be Sedo MLS eligible, the name must be registered at one of these S-designated registrars.

The complete registrar lists are long, so I show below a table including only the registrars receiving 3 or more votes in the 2022 Favorite Registrar poll. I ordered the list in terms of number of votes (at time I composed this article) in the poll. The table below shows whether a name registered at that registrar is eligible for the fast transfer networks, if other conditions are met. A green box indicates eligibility.
EligibleTableR.png

Among registrars high on the poll that are part of both the Afternic and Sedo networks are Dynadot, Sav, and NameSilo. GoDaddy, Namecheap and Porkbun registered names get you into the Afternic, but not the Sedo, system. Epik and Fabulous are Sedo, but not Afternic Premium, eligible. Name and Hexonet support both.

Extension Matters

Not all names are eligible, even if at a qualifying registrar and outside lock. The Afternic FT system only supports a rather small number of, mainly legacy, extensions. There is some confusion, so I had an Afternic representative confirm the eligible TLDs, and this is what she told me: Afternic FT eligible TLDs are .com, .net, .org, .info, .biz, .co, .de, .pw, although not all partner registrars support .de or .pw.

Sedo include many additional extensions in their MLS, including most new extensions, and a number of country code extensions, in addition to the extensions part of the Afternic system.

For example, .xyz names are eligible for Sedo MLS but not Afternic FT. If you invest significantly in new extensions it is worthwhile to use a registrar that supports Sedo MLS.

Once you add any name to your Sedo account it is made clear if it is MLS eligible.

There are some extensions, such as .cc, and a number of other country code TLDs, that are not eligible.

Approval for Network Listing

You must approve at your registrar that you agree with Afternic FT or Sedo MLS listing.

Each registrar handles this process slightly differently, and this is often the source of frustration. Most send you an email with a link to approve the listing. Note that Namecheap just send the emails once per day, so don’t expect it to come immediately after you list.

If you list the names while still within 60 day lock, you may never get this approval email, even after the name becomes eligible. One solution is to delist the name at Afternic or Sedo, and start the process again.

Dynadot have a different, in my mind better, approval system. Your Dynadot account will show names awaiting Sedo or Afternic confirmation. You just check those names, then go to Bulk Tools and select Approve Sedo or Approve Afternic as appropriate. You can deactivate fast transfer by a similar process.

Sav also use a different activation method. When logged into your account choose the Marketplace tab, then at the bottom you will see settings to approve Sedo or Afternic listings.

You can check at Sedo or Afternic that names have been properly activated.

Keep in mind that a registrar transfer will disrupt the fast transfer, even if there is not an associated lock. Afternic automatically catch these, and place your names under review. At Sedo you need to change the registrar, and then activate Sedo MLS again.

Differential Pricing of Names

Since the availability of the name is confirmed at time the client purchases from a registrar, it is acceptable to have the same names in both the Sedo and Afternic networks, if your registrar supports both. So what happens if you set different prices on the two networks?

This article came about partly because @JudgeMind, BrandAim, reached out to me. He pointed out that based on a test he had done, with some registrar partners were listing names from the fast networks at different prices, or not showing buy-it-now options at all. I did my own research, reported below, to confirm what he had discovered,

I took four domain names, all legacy names registered at Dynadot since they supported both networks, and it was easy to confirm proper network listing was active, and activate both networks simultaneously. I removed any Dynadot marketplace listings to not confuse things. I allowed a couple of days to make sure that the pricing changes had propagated to all registrars.

Here are names in my test:
  • Name A was listed for $10,000 on Afternic and $5000 on Sedo.
  • For Name B I did the opposite, $5000 at Afternic and $10,000 at Sedo.
  • For Domain C, I did not activate Afternic FT, but listed it for $10,000 on Sedo.
  • For domain D, I listed at $10,000 on Afternic, but not active on Sedo.
Since the reason to be on the registration stream is to get lots of people potentially viewing your name, I looked at larger registrars. I used data from Domain Name Stat to identify registrars with highest numbers of registered domain names. I also included a few well-known registrars used by domain investors that would not have qualified based on number of registrations.

I went to each registrar and checked the price of each name. The results are given below.
UpdatedNetworkPriceTable.png

Results:
  • Namecheap, while not a Sedo MLS registrar, does list Sedo inventory, with a small price discount. It is a member of the Afternic network, and in the case where the Afternic price was less, it listed that, but without discount.
  • Tucows operate through a reseller network, so I checked one of their large registrars, Hover. They add to the price of each name.
  • While not many investors seem to use Google Domains, month after month they move up the registrar charts. It is not just their own names, or other new extensions. They are getting a large fraction of new .com registrations. Google Domains will show the lower of Afternic or Sedo price, but do not list names with prices above a certain level.
  • Alibaba is an Afternic Premium reseller, but only for the .com and .net extensions.
  • Network Solutions is in both networks. From this small experiment at least, seem to use Afternic pricing if available, and if not show Sedo.
  • NameSilo is in both networks, but did not show the name that was only at Afternic. Instead it showed a link to a Saw broker. The other three names were priced according to the Sedo listing.
  • OVH show Afternic listed prices when available, and a markup on Sedo listed prices for names not on Afternic.
  • IONOS showed Sedo prices without discount or markeup.
  • Name added a markup over the list price of the name.
  • RegRU RegRU apply significant markups to the list prices.
  • Dynadot, in general, listed at exactly the less expensive option, but for one name discounted.
  • Sav seemed to only be using Sedo pricing, offering a discount on the three names.
  • Porkbun are part of Afternic, but not Sedo. They listed the names at Afternic at the listed prices, and referred the buyer to a Saw broker to inquire about the name only at Sedo.
  • Epik added to the listed Sedo prices.
Does this matter to the seller? The seller still get the same list price, minus the marketplace commissions, no matter whether the name was sold slightly above or below list.

However, the variable prices may lead to lack of buyer confidence, and it is unfortunate that some registrars do not seem to be fully supporting their networks with any buy-it-now price shown at all.

To the domain buyer, there can be large price differences depending where they end up buying.

This was a very small sample at a single point in time. It may not totally represent what happens. It is my understanding that NameSilo are currently working on getting Afternic FT prices showing correctly once more.

New Dan–Afternic Optional Integration

Until recently, many domain investors listed on all three of Afternic, Sedo and Dan. The Dan.com product update 7 introduced an option to list on Dan and have your names automatically listed on Afternic at the same buy-it-now price. This is definitely more convenient.

Afternic/GoDaddy agents will no longer have a floor price, however, if the name is listed only through Dan.

Names sold through Afternic via the Dan integration will have a total commission of 20%. That covers both the Dan and Afternic components, and is same as the Afternic commission for most names.

If you continue to sell only directly through Dan, and not integrate with Afternic, the commission remains at 9%.

The sales commission structure at Afternic is graduated, so if your names sell at $5000 or more you will pay less commission if you list them separately on Afternic rather than use the Dan network integration.

If you already have listings on Afternic, they will take precedence over any integrated from Dan.

NamePros members are discussing the Dan-Afternic Distribution Integration here.

Your Thoughts

Please share in the discussion your thoughts on the merits and importance of fast transfer networks.

Article updated Dec 2, 2022:
(1) The distinction between the Afternic Premium Reseller Network and registrars that qualify names for Afternic FT has been made more obvious.
(2) Both tables have been updated. Note that Hexonet registrations qualify under both networks. Additional explanatory information added within tables.
(3) Google is a network reseller, but names registered there are not eligible for FT. As a reseller, Google Domains only list names below a certain price, so names priced at $10,000 did not appear.
(4) Alibaba is an Afternic premium reseller, but only for .com and .net, not for .org or the other FT extensions. Names registered at Alibaba are not eligible for fast transfer, though.


Sincere thanks to @JudgeMind, BrandAim on Twitter, for reaching out and suggesting an article that included how fast transfer network names are listed, or not, on different registrars. Also, thanks to Polly at GoDaddy/Afternic for answering my questions about Afternic FT and the premium network, and to @Michael Cyger for putting me in touch with her. It was @Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames who first pointed out that the commission in the integrated Dan-Afternic listing would be higher for names at $5000 and above. I acknowledge the registrar statistics provided by DomainNameStat.
 
Last edited:
81
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
For example 5 days before expiration, erase prices, and even if renewed don't
activate the old price.
Hi
Didn't get this point. Could you please elaborate on this. As to why this should be done.
Thanks.
 
3
•••
3
•••
I have really enjoyed the Fast Transfer option , it’s hands free selling . If I were a buyer , I would prefer the Fast Transfer option as opposed to waiting up to 10 days to receive my domain name
 
4
•••
Just a thought, it might also be very interesting to test FT Vs Non-FT Bin listings at both Afternic and Sedo, to see how much additional exposure the FT option brings to your names.

So say,

Domain A: BIN $5000 at AF with FT
Domain B: BIN $5000 at AF without FT
Domain C: BIN $5000 at Sedo with FT
Domain D: BIN $5000 at Sedo without FT

Would be a nice Part2 for your article if you are up for it :)
 
2
•••
Hi
Didn't get this point. Could you please elaborate on this. As to why this should be done.
Thanks.

We lose domains when they are grabbed by someone (via registrar), in that case domains don't drop,
and marketplaces don't know that we lost theese domains, so they don't remove old listings.
We can't remove them either because this is an extremely time consuming process. Marketplaces don't give us
tools to simplify this process either.
 
3
•••
Really super article. And i learn something from last domain sales about Fast transfer, i wrongly accepted an offer and buyer also paid with in 2mint and ( i got $1250 offer and my next counter offer $3200, but i type wrongly $320 then offer accepted and buyer paid one of Dan staff forced to me for the transfer with out my side explanation) but fast transfer not work so my domains safe. If possible fast transfer my domain gone. That's my experience. (But next i call higher officer and Dan higer Officer cancel sales and re list then another buyer purchased for $1200 domain name MeetWee.com)
 
3
•••
Your threads always educate a beginner like me . Thank you @Bob Hawkes
 
2
•••
good topic... I got millon dollar question... as i hate afternic site basically unusable on fone and bad ui etc... i was thrilled to recently find out dan.com offers same thing as listing on afternic network... after confirming with dan folks it is true u get same result and can basically close yer afternic accnt and deal and manage all names via dan. of course u need bins. anyway my pickle question is.. if u do it by dan... there is no optin emails ...no registrar optin etc... and yet it all works... my dan bin names show up fine on gd auctons etc... so who knows how they do it without that optin thing..which of course we all.hated...time wasting etc...my guess is if name sells via dan on this network dan simply.handles transfer as they always do...so u know .. no instant transfer etc..which is.better too...cause fast transfer often caused issues....
 
1
•••
I have did an update to the article (see at bottom for list of changes). I had one error in the table of eligible registrars. Names registered at Hexonet qualify for both networks. My apology to them. I also took the opportunity to add some explanatory side-notes in both tables.

Note that there are two lists of registrars, etc. with respect to Afternic. To find a listing of their premium reseller network, where your domain names will be promoted, go to https://www.afternic.com/domain-reseller-network. Although the Alibaba and Google logos are not currently listed (I am told there will soon be an updated logo list), both are premium network resellers. Alibaba only are included for .com and .net, not the other eligible extensions. Google sells from both Afternic FT and Sedo MLS, but only below a certain price point - that is why the $10,000 names do not show up, but the $5000 do.

There is unfortunately not a direct link for the graphic showing the different list of which registrars make your names eligible for Afternic FT. For some registrars popular among domain investors, I show that data in the table above. You can find the full list by going first to the Afternic network link https://www.afternic.com/domain-reseller-network, and then scroll down until you find a green link that says 'fast transfer registrars'. That brings up a pop-up of the logos of the registrars that support Afternic fast transfer. So for example Google sell your names listed on the FT network, but names you register at Google are not eligible to get on that network, and similarly for others. So make sure you use the right set of Afternic registrars.

Note also that not all registrars which are eligible for FT are included in my table. I only listed those receiving multiple votes in the NamePros registrar poll. Use the procedure in the paragraph above to find the full list.

-Bob
 
Last edited:
3
•••
it might also be very interesting to test FT Vs Non-FT Bin listings at both Afternic and Sedo, to see how much additional exposure the FT option brings to your names
It is a good suggestion. In principle one could add up the total registrations at the network of partners covered by each system, to compare. The point that is not obvious is that while GD dominate any other registrar, taking collectively the huge majority of names are registered somewhere else. I might try to see what fraction of all registrars are part of the networks.

Beyond that, if one knew what fraction of people find a name from a registrar site, as opposed to say just typing the name in an URL or visiting a brandable marketplace or starting a contest or hiring a naming agency or broker, etc., one might be able to come up with an approximate figure, but so many assumptions would be tricky.

Thanks for the suggestion.

-Bob
 
1
•••
It is a good suggestion. In principle one could add up the total registrations at the network of partners covered by each system, to compare. The point that is not obvious is that while GD dominate any other registrar, taking collectively the huge majority of names are registered somewhere else. I might try to see what fraction of all registrars are part of the networks.

The point I was making was much simpler. My curiosity is more on the additional exposure a FT BIN listing gets to a non-FT BIN listing. For example, Afternic claims that the additional exposure you get via the FT BIN lisitng vs the non-FT BIN listing is 2-3x. I have a feeling that this is vastly overestimated. I suspect the additional exposure (just via the registrar path, as the direct type-ins, and other pathways would be similar in both the cases) might not be more than 10-15%, as against 100-200% claimed by them.

Even if one were to check the top 20 registrars for FT BIN vs non-FT and if in both the cases the exposure is the same on the top 20 registrars, it should confirm my suspicions, as the top-20 registrars should make up for 90% plus of the total registrar pathway exposure.

Beyond that, if one knew what fraction of people find a name from a registrar site, as opposed to say just typing the name in an URL or visiting a brandable marketplace or starting a contest or hiring a naming agency or broker, etc., one might be able to come up with an approximate figure, but so many assumptions would be tricky.

Yes, analyzing the approximate % exposure via the registrar pathway vs direct type-in and other pathways would be a far more complex exercise. But a nifty trick to guesstimate this would be via the reported sales numbers by holders of big domain portfolios at NP. From what I follow of the big portfolio holders (holding say more that 10,000 domains), they always say the maximum number of sales for them are from Afternic network. Basing on their reports, I would guesstimate that the total exposure from the registrar pathway (Proxied by the Afternic & Sedo Networks) dominates all the other channels and could amount to 50-70% of the total exposure. Would love for the big domain portfolio holders at NP to chime in on this. @Recons.Com , @AbdulBasit.com and others.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
The point I was making was much simpler. My curiosity is more on the additional exposure a FT BIN listing gets to a non-FT BIN listing. For example, Afternic claims that the additional exposure you get via the FT BIN lisitng vs the non-FT BIN listing is 2-3x. I have a feeling that this is vastly overestimated. I suspect the additional exposure (just via the registrar path, as the direct type-ins, and other pathways would be similar in both the cases) might not be more than 10-15%, as against 100-200% claimed by them.

Even if one were to check the top 20 registrars for FT BIN vs non-FT and if in both the cases the exposure is the same on the top 20 registrars, it should confirm my suspicions, as the top-20 registrars should make up for 90% plus of the total registrar pathway exposure.



Yes, analyzing the approximate % exposure via the registrar pathway vs direct type-in and other pathways would be a far more complex exercise. But a nifty trick to guesstimate this would be via the reported sales numbers by holders of big domain portfolios at NP. From what I follow of the big portfolio holders (holding say more that 10,000 domains), they always say the maximum number of sales for them are from Afternic network. Basing on their reports, I would guesstimate that the total exposure from the registrar pathway (Proxied by the Afternic & Sedo Networks) dominates all the other channels and could amount to 50-70% of the total exposure. Would love for the big domain portfolio holders at NP to chime in on this. @Recons.Com , @AbdulBasit.com and others.

Afternic is essential. It can be the difference between being profitable and making loss regularly.

You can do fine without Sedo, as the platform's own sales are minimal and the network duplicates Afternic to some extent. Plus a lot of headache listing. Most of their sales come from Namecheap if the latter decides to prioritize their feed over Afternic, but that is not incremental sales for you.

From my experience, sales distribute like this (without any enhancements, outbound, ads, etc, just passive sales):

1/3 from Afternic/GD search and registration pathway, 1/3 Afternic FT, 1/3 lander.

Of course, this is a rough estimate and might vary from month to month, portfolio to portfolio, actual choice of lander (dan, AN bin, AN PUR, own landers etc.), pricing range. It also indicates that you can't ignore any of those without consequences.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
The point I was making was much simpler. My curiosity is more on the additional exposure a FT BIN listing gets to a non-FT BIN listing. For example, Afternic claims that the additional exposure you get via the FT BIN lisitng vs the non-FT BIN listing is 2-3x. I have a feeling that this is vastly overestimated. I suspect the additional exposure (just via the registrar path, as the direct type-ins, and other pathways would be similar in both the cases) might not be more than 10-15%, as against 100-200% claimed by them.

Even if one were to check the top 20 registrars for FT BIN vs non-FT and if in both the cases the exposure is the same on the top 20 registrars, it should confirm my suspicions, as the top-20 registrars should make up for 90% plus of the total registrar pathway exposure.



Yes, analyzing the approximate % exposure via the registrar pathway vs direct type-in and other pathways would be a far more complex exercise. But a nifty trick to guesstimate this would be via the reported sales numbers by holders of big domain portfolios at NP. From what I follow of the big portfolio holders (holding say more that 10,000 domains), they always say the maximum number of sales for them are from Afternic network. Basing on their reports, I would guesstimate that the total exposure from the registrar pathway (Proxied by the Afternic & Sedo Networks) dominates all the other channels and could amount to 50-70% of the total exposure. Would love for the big domain portfolio holders at NP to chime in on this. @Recons.Com , @AbdulBasit.com and others.
I've tested a few of my FT hyphenated dot com domains and they appear on the suggestions of GD results when searched for the non-hyphenated version. And tested a few of the non-FT and I didn't see them on the results for similar searches

Also I understand that the network for FT activated domains is bigger
 
Last edited:
4
•••
1/3 from Afternic/GD search and registration pathway, 1/3 Afternic FT

Could you clarify this a little. From my understanding, you mean 1/3 comes from Afternic/GD internal registrar pathway and 1/3 from the extended Afternic FT partner network registrar pathway, taking the total registrar pathway to about 2/3, which was also my understanding, that majority (passive) sales comes from the registrar pathway.

I've tested a few of my FT hyphenated dot com domains and they appear on the suggestions of GD results when searched for the non-hyphenated version. And tested a few of the non-FT and I didn't see them on the results for similar searches

This is huge, if it is correct, as this means that domains in the FT network do not only get listed on additional network partners but also get prioritized exposure over non-FT listings. This would make opting for FT that much more important. Thanks for this valuable info byte.
 
Last edited:
5
•••
The point I was making was much simpler. My curiosity is more on the additional exposure a FT BIN listing gets to a non-FT BIN listing. For example, Afternic claims that the additional exposure you get via the FT BIN lisitng vs the non-FT BIN listing is 2-3x. I have a feeling that this is vastly overestimated. I suspect the additional exposure (just via the registrar path, as the direct type-ins, and other pathways would be similar in both the cases) might not be more than 10-15%, as against 100-200% claimed by them.

Even if one were to check the top 20 registrars for FT BIN vs non-FT and if in both the cases the exposure is the same on the top 20 registrars, it should confirm my suspicions, as the top-20 registrars should make up for 90% plus of the total registrar pathway exposure.



Yes, analyzing the approximate % exposure via the registrar pathway vs direct type-in and other pathways would be a far more complex exercise. But a nifty trick to guesstimate this would be via the reported sales numbers by holders of big domain portfolios at NP. From what I follow of the big portfolio holders (holding say more that 10,000 domains), they always say the maximum number of sales for them are from Afternic network. Basing on their reports, I would guesstimate that the total exposure from the registrar pathway (Proxied by the Afternic & Sedo Networks) dominates all the other channels and could amount to 50-70% of the total exposure. Would love for the big domain portfolio holders at NP to chime in on this. @Recons.Com , @AbdulBasit.com and others.

I've clearly noticed that FT BIN listings get more exposure which results in more sales. Although around 50% of my sales are happening via GD search. Few sales are coming in via AN landers and/or partner registrars but it's still worth using FT BIN listings.
 
5
•••
Super useful article and comments

Some points from me as i use these networks for years.

1. Exposure is multiplied as name appears at search of many registrars, eg 900 for MLS including big like
Namecheap (last 3 years namecheap is the 70% of sales vis MLS for me), My registrar is dynadot for 95% of my names
2. TLD affects exposure big time, .eg listing .me at MLS appears everywhere on the network, listing .club appears at less of 50% of network
3. GD was part of sedo MLS in the past, then part ways
4.Listing a good name at both networks is tricky as if name get sold at both places can have legal consequences or loose an account.
5.Wish dynadot to establish in the future a system like Hexonet when you can list automatically at sedo MLS and Afternic DLS the nameS without the need to log in at sedo or afternic or verify via TXT, just need to put the credentials of marketplaces at Hex.
In such a way would be possible to list names at all networks and if name reserved for sale at one can be automatically removed rom the other networks same moment.
6. A good way to not need to add txt every time is to create a DNS template with all txt records (sedo, gd, dan) at dynadot and put it as default DNS there, in this way when you reg, transfer or push a name to account it will have all needed TXT records. Works also at Namesilo, did noT search at others.

M
 
4
•••
The Dan/Afternic thing is driving me nuts right now. I don't use Dan at all, but I'm currently having trouble listing some domains on Afternic because they're listed on Dan.

I'm getting the "Already Listed On Afternic" message, but I can't get those listings removed via Afternic support and I don't have an account with Dan. No idea how to get these listings removed. I wish Dan would setup some kind of verification and then remove their outdated listings.
 
8
•••
The Dan/Afternic thing is driving me nuts right now. I don't use Dan at all, but I'm currently having trouble listing some domains on Afternic because they're listed on Dan.

I'm getting the "Already Listed On Afternic" message, but I can't get those listings removed via Afternic support and I don't have an account with Dan. No idea how to get these listings removed. I wish Dan would setup some kind of verification and then remove their outdated listings.
Give them a holler on their support page, tell them the domains listed you now own and were not removed by the previous owner, and they'll get back to you on next steps.

https://dan.com/contact#contact-form
 
2
•••
That was useful. Thanks for the insights!
 
2
•••
Hey Bob. Thanks for all the insights. I looked through that fast transfer blog of yours. Very thorough and informational. 👍
 
2
•••
Thanks to Bob, the biggest reward is the great exposure of the Fast-Transfer network.
From everyone's experience, we can see that afternic is much better than sedo.

Sedo's service is really not up to par with afternic. If you send an email, either it is not answered, or no one cares. I saw a lot of people in namepros who had the same experience as me. SEDO in addition to the commission is a little lower, the other is very inconvenient, not conducive to your bulk sales of domains.
 
1
•••
(Holding off on this question until I check something...)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The primary reason to be on the networks is not because the transfer and payment is faster, in many cases it is not. Rather it is that your name appears at a larger number of registrars.
That's true

although, just in order to avoid the misunderstanding - which I fell into - of thinking that putting a domain on sale on one registrar's marketplace leads automatically to making it appear on all marketplaces of the network that registrar is integrated into... that's not the case.
At least not for Dynadot.

I asked their support: putting a domain on sale on Dynadot's marketplace doesn't automatically lead that domain to be displayed on all marketplaces of the Networks Dynadot is integrated into.
This has to be set separately by the domainer, following Dynadot's guidelines.


It would be interesting to know what are precisely the benefits for a registrar of such integrations.
If they are substantial, Dynadot should have a decisive competitive advantage vs. their competition, as they are the only registrar integrated in both Sedo and Afternic Networks.
 
0
•••
putting a domain on sale on one registrar's marketplace leads automatically to making it appear on all marketplaces of the network that registrar is integrated into... that's not the case.
At least not for Dynadot.
It never occurred to me a misunderstanding that the registrar marketplace was how you get on a network, but thank you for drawing attention to it, as I am sure others have thought that way too. To get on either network you must list on that network, and then confirm with your registrar. It has nothing to do with a registrar marketplace listing.

You can list on the Dynadot marketplace without being on either Sedo MLS or Afternic FT, and conversely you can be on one, or both, of the networks but never list on the Dynadot marketplace (and same for every other registrar). A network of marketplaces is a very good idea, but that is not what Afternic FT or Sedo MLS is.
Dynadot should have a decisive competitive advantage vs. their competition, as they are the only registrar integrated in both Sedo and Afternic Networks.
Dynadot is a respected and well-loved registrar among domainers for many good reasons, including a transparent integration with both networks, but it is by no means the only registrar to support both. On the left hand table in the article any registrar with both green blocks support both. For example Name, Sav, NameSilo, Hexonet, eNom, and Network Solutions support both, as do many other registrars who are not in the table which was based on those receiving a certain number of votes in the NamePros registrar popularity poll. I agree that there is some advantage in additional coverage when using a registrar that is part of both networks.

-Bob
 
1
•••
It never occurred to me a misunderstanding that the registrar marketplace was how you get on a network, but thank you for drawing attention to it, as I am sure others have thought that way too. To get on either network you must list on that network, and then confirm with your registrar. It has nothing to do with a registrar marketplace listing.

You can list on the Dynadot marketplace without being on either Sedo MLS or Afternic FT, and conversely you can be on one, or both, of the networks but never list on the Dynadot marketplace (and same for every other registrar). A network of marketplaces is a very good idea, but that is not what Afternic FT or Sedo MLS is.

Dynadot is a respected and well-loved registrar among domainers for many good reasons, including a transparent integration with both networks, but it is by no means the only registrar to support both. On the left hand table in the article any registrar with both green blocks support both. For example Name, Sav, NameSilo, Hexonet, eNom, and Network Solutions support both, as do many other registrars who are not in the table which was based on those receiving a certain number of votes in the NamePros registrar popularity poll. I agree that there is some advantage in additional coverage when using a registrar that is part of both networks.

-Bob
I’ve seen registrar listings get propagated to GD/AN, but not sure if they can go further to the standard MLS for each. It’s conceivable that they may in some cases, but certainly not to FT networks.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back