Dynadot

news Russia calls for ICANN to split from US

Spaceship
The Russian government has called on ICANN to further distance itself from US legal jurisdiction, complaining that the current war-related sanctions could prevent its companies from applying for new gTLDs. In recent comments, Russia said that “no single state or group of states should have the right to interfere in the operation of critical Internet...

Russia calls for ICANN to split from US | Domain Incite - News, Analysis & Opinion
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
"According to OFAC, domain registration services are exempt from the US sanctions. That has not stopped several domain registries and registrars ceasing business with Russians on moral grounds."

So much for Internet neutrality. Sure, registrars, are free to kick out sanctioned entities, but registries and ICANN should be neutral, IMO (as much as I want Russia to bite the dust). I wonder, if Iran wanted to launch a Farsi TLD, will it be rejected because "Iran bad"? What the US has to do with it?
 
Last edited:
2
•••
4
•••
"According to OFAC, domain registration services are exempt from the US sanctions. That has not stopped several domain registries and registrars ceasing business with Russians on moral grounds."

So much for Internet neutrality. Sure, registrars, are free to kick out sanctioned entities, but registries and ICANN should be neutral, IMO (as much as I want Russia to bite the dust). I wonder, if Iran wanted to launch a Farsi TLD, will it be rejected because "Iran bad"? What the US has to do with it?
I kind of see legacy extensions like regulated utilities. In general, registry operators should not be blocking registrations on subjective grounds.

nGtld are kind of different, because now all of a sudden there are hundreds of different companies that actually own the extensions. They are not just the operators.

Right or wrong, in most cases companies can generally choose who they do business with.

Russia's complaint seems more theoretical though. I would love to see actual examples of registries that have blocked them.

It's pretty clear ICANN is not going block domain applicants just because they are from Russia.

Brad
 
2
•••
Also, the organization has to be domiciled somewhere.

Right now it is in the US and it is likely to stay that way.

It worked out alright when ICANN tried to give the greenlight to the private equity .ORG takeover despite the overwhelming public sentiment against it.

It was only when the California AG stepped in, that ICANN did an about face and rejected the deal.

I don't really trust ICANN to just do the right thing. They actually need some oversight and accountability as well.

Brad
 
2
•••
Historically, similar forces have advocated for transferring some of ICANN’s functions to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). These forces often include countries seeking greater control over internet resources, and a more multilateral approach to governance, as opposed to the current model perceived as US-centric.

https://www.techmonitor.ai/technology/icann_to_fend_off_itu_with_global_expansion
 
4
•••
Historically, similar forces have advocated for transferring some of ICANN’s functions to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). These forces often include countries seeking greater control over internet resources, and a more multilateral approach to governance, as opposed to the current model perceived as US-centric.

https://www.techmonitor.ai/technology/icann_to_fend_off_itu_with_global_expansion
The US is not perfect, but does have a decent track record.

ICANN already has very limited oversight now. The idea of some nebulous organization with absolutely no oversight at all would be troubling.

Brad
 
Last edited:
3
•••
3
•••
"As of November 10, 2023, SITA, the administrator of the “.aero” domain zone, has stopped accepting orders for registration and renewal of domain registration in the domain zone “.aero” to clients from the Russian Federation."

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/zhivov-to-sinha-07jun24-en.pdf
Interesting.

If this part from the letter is accurate, then ICANN should already have authority to act now.

We note that SITA, as the registrar of the “.aero” domain zone, does not have the right to make arbitrary decisions and shall be guided by ICANN policies, which do not provide for indiscriminate blocking of customers based on territorial, national or other general characteristics.

Then this -

ICANN responded to the letter yesterday, three months after Zhinov sent the letter. ICANN’s response stated, “If you believe the registry operator has failed to comply with any of the obligations set forth by the .aero Top-Level Domain (TLD) Sponsorship Agreement, you may consider submitting a complaint to Contractual Compliance.”

ICANN just kind of sucks in general. I don't think setting them free from any possible accountability is going to lead to some improvement.

Brad
 
Last edited:
3
•••
ICANN just kind of sucks in general.
Assuming that is the case, there is just one TLD that would really fit the organization perfectly.
 
4
•••
Assuming that is the case, there is just one TLD that would really fit the organization perfectly.
Sure, but you should probably buy .foo also for brand protection. ;)

Brad
 
3
•••
The web should open with a splash screen that states:

MADE IN THE USA
*RESTRICTIONS APPLY​
 
2
•••
2
•••
Cry me a river, Russia. What's next, North Korea demanding to take over the .Kim gTLD? 🙄
 
4
•••
Last time the United Nations had russia to lead their "security council", their leader even shaked hands with Lavrov. I sincerely hope ICANN never ends in the hands of the UN.
 
4
•••
the only way to do it is by capitalism and russia cant stand that option anyway. A competitive icann.org alternative and setting it all up again. More satellite trash in space etc.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back