| | |||||
| ||||||||
| Website Development Development concepts, scripts, sponsors and affiliate programs. |
| View Poll Results: How is my idea ? | |||
| Hot | | 1 | 33.33% |
| So-so | | 1 | 33.33% |
| Not hot | | 1 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | THREAD STARTER #1 (permalink) |
| i love automation Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: xrvel.com
Posts: 1,620
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: NJ
Posts: 1,219
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | how are you planning on compressing it? Just take out whitespace? As far as I can tell, CSS is pretty fast to be able to notice a significant difference in speed via compression unless it's a HUGE (and i mean huge) file. i honestly can't see the benefit of it, because that would require the user to call an external file (which will be limited by your upload speed and their download speed rather than just calling it locally) so the speed saved via compression would be lost to calling it externally and it also would make using an SSL certificate a pain ("OMG INSECURE ITEMS, CONTINUE??!?!").
__________________ Hacksar.com - Your source for random computer tips and tricks! MySiteMemberships.com - Keep track of your site registration information! Like my post? Rep is appreciated! |
| |
| | THREAD STARTER #3 (permalink) |
| i love automation Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: xrvel.com
Posts: 1,620
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Yes i doubt the "benefit" recently In most of my test cases the compression result is only about 60-90%.I still have no idea for the SSL. Thank you for your opinion and the SSL input
__________________ |
| |