Results from the most recent live auction are here .
20 members in the live chat room. Join Chat !
· #1 onArcade.com
Name: Hans
Location: Estonia
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,232
NP$: 537.85 (
Donate )
Awstats vs. Webalizer
· #2 Senior Member
Name: TP
Location: Online
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,860
NP$: 293.00 (
Donate )
hard to say, I use awstats to keep track of my traffic, most people do as far as I know. Not had any problems when it comes to reliability and accuracy so far..
__________________* Losers make excuses - winners make it happen *
· #3 NamePros Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 115
NP$: 87.00 (
Donate )
I had a similar experience once the only difference is that Webalizer showed more visitors than Awstats.
· #4 Senior Member
Location: CSite.Net
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,198
NP$: 5.49 (
Donate )
Webalizer seems to include redirects and search engines in their visitors list, where awstats filters most of that out. Probably why webalizer shows more visitors than awstats does.
· #5 MillionaireGroup.com
Name: Ryan
Location: Columbus, GA
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,734
NP$: 400.10 (
Donate )
Originally Posted by sunken Webalizer seems to include redirects and search engines in their visitors list, where awstats filters most of that out. Probably why webalizer shows more visitors than awstats does.
yes so neither are inaccurate, its just awstats is more detailed alittle bit. I use 3 stats and compare them to each other to estimate the exact counts if needed.
· #6 Senior Member
Name: Nikos Mpirikos
Location: Greece
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,199
NP$: 2.32 (
Donate )
Quote: Awstats shows me more visitors than Webalizer, so which one should I trust?
In my cpanel there is being the diffenet thing, more visits in Webalizer so i prefer it
__________________
· #7 Senior Member
Name: Justin
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,467
NP$: 0.06 (
Donate )
awstats all the way, i really hate it when hosts dont have it in the cpanel :P
· #8 onArcade.com
Name: Hans
Location: Estonia
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,232
NP$: 537.85 (
Donate )
Originally Posted by DJ-Sound yes so neither are inaccurate, its just awstats is more detailed alittle bit. I use 3 stats and compare them to each other to estimate the exact counts if needed.
but one must be inaccurate because one shows only 100 visits and the other shows 1000 visits
· #9 MillionaireGroup.com
Name: Ryan
Location: Columbus, GA
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,734
NP$: 400.10 (
Donate )
not really, 900 of those 1000 could be search engines, I get over 1000 visits by the google bot a day on average...
· #10 onArcade.com
Name: Hans
Location: Estonia
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,232
NP$: 537.85 (
Donate )
Originally Posted by DJ-Sound not really, 900 of those 1000 could be search engines, I get over 1000 visits by the google bot a day on average...
but Awstats shows more than Webalizer and sunken said that Webalizer includes redirects and search engines
· #11 Account Closed
Name: Tony
Location: Manchester, UK
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 624
NP$: 30.00 (
Donate )
i personally go with awstats
· #12 Senior Member
Name: Muneeb Ahmed
Location: Poly-Web.com
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,347
NP$: 42.25 (
Donate )
well in my opinion AWstat is the BEST !
· #13 NamePros Regular
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 638
NP$: 435.60 (
Donate )
Originally Posted by hanz but one must be inaccurate because one shows only 100 visits and the other shows 1000 visits
all stats programs make assumptions, and are inaccurate.
· #14 Senior Member
Location: canada
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,009
NP$: 200.76 (
Donate )
i prefer awstats over any other. And i too HATE it when i get a host that doesnt have it/.
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
onArcade 2.1 is HERE!
