 | | |||||
Welcome, Guest! Ready to make a name for yourself in the domain business? We welcome both the hobbyist and professional domainer to join the discussion as part of the NamePros community.
Click here to create your profile to start earning reputation for posting, and trader ratings for buying & selling in our free e-marketplace. Build your trader rating with each successful sale. Our system has tracked over 100,000 sales and counting!
Click here to create your profile to start earning reputation for posting, and trader ratings for buying & selling in our free e-marketplace. Build your trader rating with each successful sale. Our system has tracked over 100,000 sales and counting!
| ||||||||
| Web Design Reviews Showcase your designs and request reviews and feedback. |
 |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
12-19-2007, 07:06 AM
| THREAD STARTER #1 (permalink) |
| NamePros Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 79
   | Logo Reviews Hi All. I have decided to try and make a logo for my gaming community (gamers-resource.net) Please could you tell me which one your prefer, and feedback is welcome. 1) http://www.imgpig.com/uploads/69345_GR+Logo+1.gif 2) http://www.imgpig.com/uploads/87104_GR+Logo+3.gif Thanks! Callum |
|
|
12-20-2007, 09:20 AM
| #2 (permalink) |
| NamePros Expert  Join Date: May 2005 Location: www.chrome.us
Posts: 5,217
    | Ideally, i'd pick a mix of the 2 logos. 1, Has too many angles and overall looks a bit messy. However, it does contain the valuable mission statement/tag line: Chat, Debate, Review, Solve. 2, Has cleaner lines, is less busy and doesn't have as many angles which makes for a more smooth appearance. If you'd manage to combine 1 and 2, while keeping the clean cut look of #2, you'd have a very usable logo. IB |
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 01:46 PM
| #3 (permalink) |
| NamePros Regular  Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 452
 | Callum, I agree with IB. I personally like the first one because it's cluttered and non-conformist...but I think based on your forum (clean, structured, organized) it doesn't fit. If the site in general was more edgy, ruffed up looking, then I would say #1 is actually a good logo. Anyway, I hope this helps. Nice job.
__________________ www.slicksticks.com Whole room wall graphics designed by former Walt Disney artists that are changing the way people decorate. No paint, no stencils, no fumes, no mess...easy start to finish in under 45 minutes. Inexpensive, one of a kind & totally cool. |
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 04:17 PM
| #4 (permalink) |
| Senior Member  Join Date: May 2005 Location: I'm right here
Posts: 3,526
| I really can't recommend any of them. The first one is indeed busy, but second one has nice logo font (just if you improve the slogan.) make it clean less busy, and it will look better indeed. So probably you need the 2nd one with minor adjustments.
__________________ WP Theme Developer Your One-stop for Premium Magazine/CMS WordPress Themes Deluxe Themes |
|
|
|
12-21-2007, 12:16 AM
| #5 (permalink) |
| NamePros Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 38
| Image 1: Too busy, and you have too many elements that you really don't need as a part of your logo. Image 2: Not bad, I would say get rid of the URL. Put it somewhere else on your website, and if you really want with your logo, try to use the same fonts you used to your slogan. And I always find it easier to read when use mix case for URL rather than all upper case. You can add your FX and colors later but something like this http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/7278/44261582nr2.jpg or maybe this one without the URL http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/7117/78928354it8.jpg ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/web-design-reviews/408699-logo-reviews.html good luck |
|
|
