NamePros
Welcome, Guest! Ready to make a name for yourself in the domain business? We welcome both the hobbyist and professional domainer to join the discussion as part of the NamePros community.

Click here to create your profile to start earning reputation for posting, and trader ratings for buying & selling in our free e-marketplace. Build your trader rating with each successful sale. Our system has tracked over 100,000 sales and counting!
FAQ & TOS Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   NamePros.com > Website Development Discussion Forums > Web Design Discussion
Reload this Page Site Resolution

Web Design Discussion Discussion of web design techniques, advice, browser issues, software, design firms.

Advanced Search


View Poll Results: Which is the best resoultion for a website?
800 x 600 15 48.39%
1024 x 768 13 41.94%
1280 x 1024 3 9.68%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-27-2005, 07:28 AM THREAD STARTER               #1 (permalink)
NamePros Member
 
samkool's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Karachi, Pakistan
Posts: 101
samkool is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Site Resolution


Which is the best resolution to make a site?

800 x 600
1024 x 768
1280 x 1024
samkool is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 05:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
Rowan W's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: QLD, Australia
Posts: 713
Rowan W will become famous soon enough
 



760px across, enough said.
Rowan W is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 05:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 27
Throwbacks is an unknown quantity at this point
 



I use about 1024x768!
Throwbacks is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 07:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 161
voodoo is an unknown quantity at this point
 



I use 1024 x 768
voodoo is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 10:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ThreeD's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Online
Posts: 2,301
ThreeD has much to be proud ofThreeD has much to be proud ofThreeD has much to be proud ofThreeD has much to be proud ofThreeD has much to be proud ofThreeD has much to be proud ofThreeD has much to be proud ofThreeD has much to be proud of
 


Animal Cruelty
My current monitor uses 1600x1200, my laptop uses 1400x1050 In general I don't make any website wider than 800 pixels, that way side scrolling is avoided. I do however switch back and forth between resolutions to see what it looks like in smaller resolutions..
__________________
* Losers make excuses - winners make it happen *
ThreeD is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 10:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 34
elliothere is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Around 760px wide is usually a pretty good size, any more than 770 wide and you'll start getting sidebar scrolling on 800x600 resolutions.
__________________
- Elliot Swan
elliothere is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 11:10 PM THREAD STARTER               #7 (permalink)
NamePros Member
 
samkool's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Karachi, Pakistan
Posts: 101
samkool is an unknown quantity at this point
 



.. i use the 778 px wide , my Monitors resolution is 1280x 1024
__________________
:bingo:
samkool is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:44 AM   #8 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 653
Robson is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Design for the majority, that would be making sure your designs work in 800x600 and above.
Robson is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:46 AM   #9 (permalink)
Hari ng Sablay
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,529
bentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond reputebentong has a reputation beyond repute
 


VA Tech Memorial Ethan Allen Fund AIDS/HIV Save a Life Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet
1024x768 on 15" monitor
bentong is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 07:15 AM   #10 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 405
dweeb is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Originally Posted by bentong
1024x768 on 15" monitor
This is what I have too i think.
But I'm not too sure what size is the best to design in, after all, there are so many different resolutions out there that people are using.
dweeb is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 08:26 AM   #11 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 94
aspiramedia is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Design for all sizes and make it liquid. No worries then.

Thought that was easy to answer. Or am I missing something?
aspiramedia is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 09:28 AM   #12 (permalink)
NamePros Member
 
Waupiman's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 77
Waupiman is an unknown quantity at this point
 



bit smaller then 800 px for the width and 100% for height mostly or els its fully strecheble for any resolution like 80% in width
Waupiman is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 01:45 AM   #13 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 247
coolpix is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Me 1024x768.
__________________
AIMForum.com - Ready, AIM, Chat!

Forum Elves - Quality Forum Posting At Affordable Prices! - Order A Package
coolpix is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 01:50 AM   #14 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
ClutchCut is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Originally Posted by talkfreelance
Design for the majority, that would be making sure your designs work in 800x600 and above.
Only about 20% of accountable hits are of users who use 800x600 or below.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/web-design-discussion/110287-site-resolution.html

This figure rises significantly in the automotive market, but that's about it.

1024x768 and up is the true 'majority'.

That said, skinny and simple (very little flash) is still, and forever will be best. Art is forever in the concept and practicality of communicating your message. Somewhere along the line art was misconstrued into how many dazzling animated buttons, knobs, twisters and whistles you could have on your site. Not true. I use 640. Then, even the small 1 to 2 % of customers who still use their 1990 CTX 11inch powerhawks can see my site nice and pretty.
ClutchCut is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 02:10 AM   #15 (permalink)
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 194
Pakinium is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Depends , I dont fix my sizes
Pakinium is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 03:20 AM   #16 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
Rowan W's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: QLD, Australia
Posts: 713
Rowan W will become famous soon enough
 



Originally Posted by ClutchCut
Only about 20% of accountable hits are of users who use 800x600 or below.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=110287

This figure rises significantly in the automotive market, but that's about it.

1024x768 and up is the true 'majority'.
You don't get it; designing for 800x600 means your site will be fully viewable on 98% (800x600 up to anything higher) of monitors instead of just 78% (1024x768+).

The extra 2% (if that) would be on PDAs, etc...
Rowan W is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 05:56 AM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Joseph's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,684
Joseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond reputeJoseph has a reputation beyond repute
 


Animal Cruelty 9/11/01 :: Never Forget Find Marrow Donors! Save The Children Save The Children Save The Children Ethan Allen Fund Baby Health Child Abuse Cancer AIDS/HIV Autism Autism Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS) Parkinson's Disease Alzheimer's Cancer Save a Life Cancer Cancer Help The Homeless - Holiday 2009 Help The Homeless - Holiday 2009 Help The Homeless - Holiday 2009 Help The Homeless - Holiday 2009
browsing the internet on your phones reliable 3.333k connection is fun!

use 800 x 600 you cant go wrong with it.
Joseph is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 12:28 PM   #18 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
ClutchCut is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Originally Posted by Rowan W
You don't get it; designing for 800x600 means your site will be fully viewable on 98% (800x600 up to anything higher) of monitors instead of just 78% (1024x768+).
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=110287

The extra 2% (if that) would be on PDAs, etc...
Unfortunately, my friend, it is you who does not get it.

First and foremost, and clearly stated by the rest of my post, I design for 640x480, let alone 800x600.

Secondly, many times, especially with interactive storefronts that require API or other checkout software, 800x600 is simply too small a resolution to display all the necessary content in a fashionable matter. (Listings often contain long titles, and multiple item orders and destroy the flow and construction of a site).

With that said, marketing research shows that designing a site towards the smaller 20% of users generally results in turning off a larger percentage of customers who are using better resolutions -- With less viewable content and more required click throughs to get through the surfing process of a site for higher resolution users, you are essentially doing nothing more than accomodating a small number of customers by alienating a potentially larger number.

In almost all cases, with automotive sales being the only true scientifcally concluded exception, you will generate more business, and maintain more return business by triggering the larger chunk of the market, not everyone possible.


The reason I use 640 is I find it to be tremendously clean, and considering I am establishing creative media and marketing for people who may not even have computers alltogether, its best to allow them to have comforting access no matter their resources. My situation, though, is very unique, and that is why I can plainly say that you really don't understand.

Marketing and Media is chess, not checkers. It's not splurge art.
ClutchCut is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 02:29 PM   #19 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
abdulmueid's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mozambique
Posts: 607
abdulmueid has a spectacular aura aboutabdulmueid has a spectacular aura about
 



I guess u can figure that by your target users.

If your site's visitors are hard-core computer geeks then obviously they are running their monitor on 1024x768 or higher... so make a site compatible with that.

If your site is for general users then I guess 800x600 would be best.
abdulmueid is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 08:27 PM   #20 (permalink)
NamePros Member
 
IRoNiK's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 65
IRoNiK is an unknown quantity at this point
 



i use 1024x768 on my computer as the resolution, but i never build sites bigger than 800x600 generally, because i like to accomodate everyone.
IRoNiK is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 06:25 AM   #21 (permalink)
NamePros Member
 
Rajo's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 165
Rajo is an unknown quantity at this point
 




i think 750 for the width is best for any resolution & 100% for the height.
it avoids the scrol bar and keeps the 800*600 user happy
__________________
Thank You
ecommerce professional
Web Site Design :wave:
Rajo is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 08:22 AM   #22 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 101
samuelocean is an unknown quantity at this point
 



1024x768 because it's more widely used I think and people with 800x600 make them increase resolution!!
samuelocean is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 08:50 AM   #23 (permalink)
NamePros Member
 
Waupiman's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 77
Waupiman is an unknown quantity at this point
 



im to lazy to edit my post but its mostly what your client want. clans want them mostly like 900 in width
Waupiman is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 09:50 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
harkster's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Red State
Posts: 1,605
harkster is a splendid one to beholdharkster is a splendid one to beholdharkster is a splendid one to beholdharkster is a splendid one to beholdharkster is a splendid one to beholdharkster is a splendid one to beholdharkster is a splendid one to behold
 



With the use of css layouts where pages shrink and expand depending on screen this is not as important as used to be. Right now most visitors are 800 X 600 so make it look best there. Watch 'expanding' pages because lines of text can get to long to read.
harkster is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 10:31 PM   #25 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
buddybuddha's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 216
buddybuddha is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Quote:
1024x768 because it's more widely used I think and people with 800x600 make them increase resolution!!
Ya but the problem is, many institutions for the public like schools and poorer libraries run computers on 800x600. Also, it never looks wel designed with side scolling and designing it for highter resolutions allw for that possibility...
buddybuddha is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Liquid Web Smart Servers  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:41 AM.

Managed Web Hosting by Liquid Web
Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com Powered by: vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 Ad Management plugin by RedTyger