| | |||||
| ||||||||
| Web Design Discussion Discussion of web design techniques, advice, browser issues, software, design firms. |
| View Poll Results: Which is the best resoultion for a website? | |||
| 800 x 600 | | 15 | 48.39% |
| 1024 x 768 | | 13 | 41.94% |
| 1280 x 1024 | | 3 | 9.68% |
| Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Online
Posts: 2,301
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | My current monitor uses 1600x1200, my laptop uses 1400x1050 In general I don't make any website wider than 800 pixels, that way side scrolling is avoided. I do however switch back and forth between resolutions to see what it looks like in smaller resolutions..
__________________ ► * Losers make excuses - winners make it happen * |
| |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| NamePros Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Oregon
Posts: 34
![]() | Around 760px wide is usually a pretty good size, any more than 770 wide and you'll start getting sidebar scrolling on 800x600 resolutions.
__________________ - Elliot Swan |
| |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 653
![]() | Design for the majority, that would be making sure your designs work in 800x600 and above.
__________________ DateinaDash.com - Speed Dating & Singles Party Events in London! |
| |
| | #10 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 405
![]() |
But I'm not too sure what size is the best to design in, after all, there are so many different resolutions out there that people are using. | ||||
| |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 247
![]() | Me 1024x768.
__________________ AIMForum.com - Ready, AIM, Chat! Forum Elves - Quality Forum Posting At Affordable Prices! - Order A Package |
| |
| | #14 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Member Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/web-design-discussion/110287-site-resolution.html This figure rises significantly in the automotive market, but that's about it. 1024x768 and up is the true 'majority'. That said, skinny and simple (very little flash) is still, and forever will be best. Art is forever in the concept and practicality of communicating your message. Somewhere along the line art was misconstrued into how many dazzling animated buttons, knobs, twisters and whistles you could have on your site. Not true. I use 640. Then, even the small 1 to 2 % of customers who still use their 1990 CTX 11inch powerhawks can see my site nice and pretty. | ||||
| |
| | #16 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: QLD, Australia
Posts: 713
![]() |
The extra 2% (if that) would be on PDAs, etc... | ||||
| |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,684
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | browsing the internet on your phones reliable 3.333k connection is fun! ![]() use 800 x 600 you cant go wrong with it.
__________________ - ForumCures.com Quality Forum Posting Service |
| |
| | #18 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Member Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
![]() |
First and foremost, and clearly stated by the rest of my post, I design for 640x480, let alone 800x600. Secondly, many times, especially with interactive storefronts that require API or other checkout software, 800x600 is simply too small a resolution to display all the necessary content in a fashionable matter. (Listings often contain long titles, and multiple item orders and destroy the flow and construction of a site). With that said, marketing research shows that designing a site towards the smaller 20% of users generally results in turning off a larger percentage of customers who are using better resolutions -- With less viewable content and more required click throughs to get through the surfing process of a site for higher resolution users, you are essentially doing nothing more than accomodating a small number of customers by alienating a potentially larger number. In almost all cases, with automotive sales being the only true scientifcally concluded exception, you will generate more business, and maintain more return business by triggering the larger chunk of the market, not everyone possible. The reason I use 640 is I find it to be tremendously clean, and considering I am establishing creative media and marketing for people who may not even have computers alltogether, its best to allow them to have comforting access no matter their resources. My situation, though, is very unique, and that is why I can plainly say that you really don't understand. Marketing and Media is chess, not checkers. It's not splurge art. | ||||
| |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Account Closed Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Mozambique
Posts: 607
![]() ![]() | I guess u can figure that by your target users. If your site's visitors are hard-core computer geeks then obviously they are running their monitor on 1024x768 or higher... so make a site compatible with that. If your site is for general users then I guess 800x600 would be best. |
| |
| | #24 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Red State
Posts: 1,605
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | With the use of css layouts where pages shrink and expand depending on screen this is not as important as used to be. Right now most visitors are 800 X 600 so make it look best there. Watch 'expanding' pages because lines of text can get to long to read. |
| |
| | #25 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: May 2005 Location: PA
Posts: 216
![]() |
__________________ The Kevin Dolan Design By Dolan Genetic Programming Source EuroToDollar: Forex Basics | ||||
| |