[advanced search]
Results from the most recent live auction are here.
16 members in the live chat room. Join Chat!
Register Rules & FAQ NP$ Store Active Threads Mark Forums Read
Go Back   NamePros.Com > Domain Names > "Short" Domain Discussion
User Name
Password

BQB.com - No Commission Domain Name Auctions
Forum Sponsor
BQB is a next generation domain name auction platform dedicated to domains of all extensions, specializing in domains of 5 characters or less.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2008, 04:19 AM   · #1
Charley
Senior Member
 
Charley's Avatar
 
Name: Charley
Location: In a 3 Bedroom Flat ©
Trader Rating: (22)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,296
NP$: 1982.70 (Donate)
Charley has much to be proud ofCharley has much to be proud ofCharley has much to be proud ofCharley has much to be proud ofCharley has much to be proud ofCharley has much to be proud ofCharley has much to be proud ofCharley has much to be proud of
Question Value of 4 letters .com

How much would you value names like

- ssts

- stmp

- hhkg


Please register or log-in into NamePros to hide ads
__________________
† Did We Know That There Aren't Really Thousands Of Bands Who Might Be Interesting, We Will Get To Deleting All Bands That Aren't In Flames, Cannibal Corpse, Morbid Angel, Deicide †
Charley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 04:36 PM   · #2
betthelot
NamePros Member
 
betthelot's Avatar
 
Name: graham
Location: UK
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 116
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
betthelot is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Charley
How much would you value names like

- ssts

- stmp

- hhkg



The value in 4 letter .coms is their intrinsic rarity. But when you consider that if only 5% of 4 letter.coms are developed 22,848, that is more than all LLL.coms put together (17,576); its so much wiser investing in LLL.coms, as the ratio of those developed will raise above 60% 70% 80% so much quicker, than as a percentage of all LLLL.coms developed; and therefore increase their intrinsic value sooner. I’m not knocking LLLL.coms only that the smart money will invest in LLL.coms. My estimate is that 3-4% of all LLLL.coms are developed where as LLL.coms its nearer 65 - 70%.

ssts $1,000
stmp $850
hhkg $350
betthelot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 04:53 PM   · #3
Reece
BQB.com Inc.
 
Reece's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (126)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,867
NP$: 2730.00 (Donate)
Reece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond repute
Member of the Month
January 2008 Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty
Most LLLL.com research suggests between 15-25% of LLLL.coms are developed.

LLL.coms are a good investment but nothing that'll ever make someone rich investing in them today. While 50%+ annual ROI is great, it'll take one hell of a long time before that makes your average Namepros domainer with maybe 20k to invest rich, even if LLL.coms continue to increase at the same rate they have in the past which I believe they will not.

Personally, I'd rather lose 50k investing in the LLLL.com market than know I'll never reach my goals staying invested in LLL.coms. An expensive lotto ticket? Perhaps, however it's one risk I'm more than willing to take.

ssts - $800
stmp - $800 (really would look for an enduser on this one)
hhkg - $150

Originally Posted by Charley
How much would you value names like

- ssts

- stmp

- hhkg

Reece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 05:21 PM   · #4
betthelot
NamePros Member
 
betthelot's Avatar
 
Name: graham
Location: UK
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 116
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
betthelot is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Reece

Personally, I'd rather lose 50k investing in the LLLL.com market than know I'll never reach my goals staying invested in LLL.coms. An expensive lotto ticket? Perhaps, however it's one risk I'm more than willing to take.



Reece, you are really committed to LLLL.coms, because by all the measures I use, LLLL.coms are far more risky than LLL.coms at the current values. I accept it’s not an exact science, so appreciate your position on this, but personally I would jump into the safer LLL.com camp.
It’s the development ratio that wins me over every time, even at your 15% - 25% - I doubt very much the 25%. LLL.coms still have plenty of growth left: yet when you see portfolios of 1000s of LLLL.coms being put up on eBay, it jars against the perceived rarity of these names. They just are not rare.
Saying that I don’t get it right every time but feel I've called this one right.
betthelot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 05:49 PM   · #5
Reece
BQB.com Inc.
 
Reece's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (126)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,867
NP$: 2730.00 (Donate)
Reece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond repute
Member of the Month
January 2008 Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty
LLLL.coms are indeed a much riskier investment, but I see it as simple as this:

Which is more likely to occur:

1 - LLL.com goes from $10,000 to $200,000 for the worst one
2 - LLLL.com goes from $15 to $300 for the worst one

In both cases the ROI is exactly the same, yet I see a $300 LLLL.com as a much more likely event than every LLL.com fetching $200,000 -- this is what I meant by no risk, no reward.

LLL.coms are a safe investment. Safe investments are great (especially in this case), but playing it safe always means compromising on ROI in the long run.



Originally Posted by betthelot
Reece, you are really committed to LLLL.coms, because by all the measures I use, LLLL.coms are far more risky than LLL.coms at the current values. I accept it’s not an exact science, so appreciate your position on this, but personally I would jump into the safer LLL.com camp.
It’s the development ratio that wins me over every time, even at your 15% - 25% - I doubt very much the 25%. LLL.coms still have plenty of growth left: yet when you see portfolios of 1000s of LLLL.coms being put up on eBay, it jars against the perceived rarity of these names. They just are not rare.
Saying that I don’t get it right every time but feel I've called this one right.

Reece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 09:49 PM   · #6
-Nick-
I'll do it
 
-Nick-'s Avatar
 
Name: Keral. Patel.
Location: India
Trader Rating: (98)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,416
NP$: 9195.05 (Donate)
-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute-Nick- has a reputation beyond repute
Member of the Month
September 2007 Adoption
Originally Posted by Reece
In both cases the ROI is exactly the same, yet I see a $300 LLLL.com as a much more likely event than every LLL.com fetching $200,000 -- this is what I meant by no risk, no reward.


Agreed and it also helps in putting eggs in different baskets. You are making more probabilities in your favor for yourself by investing in LLLL.
-Nick- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 10:31 PM   · #7
labrocca
The Spoon
 
labrocca's Avatar
 
Name: Jesse Labrocca
Location: Las Vegas
Trader Rating: (94)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,722
NP$: 2147.04 (Donate)
labrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond repute
Child Abuse Child Abuse
If you own stmp.com please let us know. I am VERY curious to know about the traffic. As a typical typo of SMTP I would think it could get great traffic. imho it's a $x,xxx domain. It can also be a stamp.com typo.

Just ran it through estibot: $5400.
labrocca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 11:00 PM   · #8
filter
Domain Wanker
 
filter's Avatar
 
Name: Dan
Location: San Francisco
Trader Rating: (127)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,612
NP$: 1.33 (Donate)
filter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond repute
Parkinson's Disease Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS) Autism Alzheimer's
Originally Posted by Reece
LLLL.coms are indeed a much riskier investment, but I see it as simple as this:

Which is more likely to occur:

1 - LLL.com goes from $10,000 to $200,000 for the worst one
2 - LLLL.com goes from $15 to $300 for the worst one

In both cases the ROI is exactly the same, yet I see a $300 LLLL.com as a much more likely event than every LLL.com fetching $200,000 -- this is what I meant by no risk, no reward.

Nice setup for a thought experiment - it gets a bit more complicated to calculate when including renewal fees though!

Without renewal fees, would need minimum price to increase by about 35% - compounded each year for 10 years to go from $15 to $300, or from $10,000 to $200,000

so (just to help simplify the calculation) let's prepay 10 years renewal for each right now for approximately $70

effect on ROI is as follows
instead of $10,000 -> $200,000 (34.9285% compounded over 10 years)
we have $10,070 -> $200,000 (34.8342% compounded over 10 years)

instead of $15 -> $300 (34.9285% compounded over 10 years)
we have $85 -> $300 (13.4411% compounded over 10 years)

now, taking this "renewal adjusted" ROI into account, it may make sense to compare chance of the $10,000 LLL.com market price increasing to $35,318 over the next 10 years (about 13.5% compounded annually) - during which time LLLL.com market price of $15 would have to increase to $300 (about 35% compounded annually).

seen in this light, LLLL.com growing at 35% vs. LLL.com growing at 13.5% annually seems a lot closer to "even odds" than the straight-up $15 -> $300 vs $10,000 -> $200,000 scenario.

But, also some other important factors to consider:

1) I'm more comfortable "investing" $85 than $10,000 at this point ... though others with bigger budgets certainly might see this the other way around.

2) $15 or even $300 is way below the "$1500 UDRP filing fee" risk threshold. A $10,000 name might require more (expensive) protection against reverse hijacking attempts. This one is a biggie, IMO.
__________________
Impurities.Info <- make offer!
filter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 01:42 AM   · #9
Reece
BQB.com Inc.
 
Reece's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (126)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,867
NP$: 2730.00 (Donate)
Reece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond repute
Member of the Month
January 2008 Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty
Good point Dan.

I tend to sell most of my cheap domains (including LLLL) about 6 months before renewals and incur very little in the way of renewal costs myself -- let someone else pay the renewals but do it enough in advance that the other person doesn't take renewal costs into any value they associate with your domain

Keep in mind that pre-paying significantly alters what the end result would otherwise be.


Take the compound interest forumula:

M = P(1+i)^n

where M = final value including principal, having taken the cost of future renewals into account
P = principal amount
i = annual interest rate
n = number of years invested

Adapting that to our unique problem, we need to account for renewal fees which currently run approximately $7 per year. I'll also factor in an annual 7% price increase (denoted as 1.07 in the formula) Verisign has us now most likely paying for the next 4 years. We'll assume prices do not increase further as there is no indication at this time that they will.

To properly compare an LLLL.com, lets assume P = $15 and lets assume an annual interest rate of i = 0.35 (NOT including renewal fees - these are covered separately as seen above) over n = 10 years (eg. equal to what we assumed on LLL.coms).

This gives us:

M = 15(1+0.35)^10 - 7(1.07) - 7(1.07)^2 - 7(1.07)^3 - 7[7(1.07)^4]

hence:

M = $301.60 - $7.49 - $8.01 - $8.58 - $64.26

which implies:

M = $301.60 - $88.34 = $213.26 (some 1 cent approximations made)

Subtracting our initial cost of $15 from M yields a profit of $198.26 from a $15 investment -- all renewal expenses taken into account.

$198.26/$15 = 13.2 times initial investment

Taking the worst LLL.com as being worth $7500 (a more fair comparison than my earlier example) would suggest that 10 years from now it should go for $106,500 if experiencing the exact same 13.2 times increase over 10 years as LLLL.coms (I'm using a real annual interest rate of .294 which is what LLLL.coms yield if renewal fees are taken into account and a nominal interest rate of .35 is assumed. Inflation is assumed nil for the purpose of this calculation, as are the miniscule effect of renewal fees on LLL.com data.)

Originally Posted by filter
Nice setup for a thought experiment - it gets a bit more complicated to calculate when including renewal fees though!

Without renewal fees, would need minimum price to increase by about 35% - compounded each year for 10 years to go from $15 to $300, or from $10,000 to $200,000

so (just to help simplify the calculation) let's prepay 10 years renewal for each right now for approximately $70

effect on ROI is as follows
instead of $10,000 -> $200,000 (34.9285% compounded over 10 years)
we have $10,070 -> $200,000 (34.8342% compounded over 10 years)

instead of $15 -> $300 (34.9285% compounded over 10 years)
we have $85 -> $300 (13.4411% compounded over 10 years)

now, taking this "renewal adjusted" ROI into account, it may make sense to compare chance of the $10,000 LLL.com market price increasing to $35,318 over the next 10 years (about 13.5% compounded annually) - during which time LLLL.com market price of $15 would have to increase to $300 (about 35% compounded annually).

seen in this light, LLLL.com growing at 35% vs. LLL.com growing at 13.5% annually seems a lot closer to "even odds" than the straight-up $15 -> $300 vs $10,000 -> $200,000 scenario.

But, also some other important factors to consider:

1) I'm more comfortable "investing" $85 than $10,000 at this point ... though others with bigger budgets certainly might see this the other way around.

2) $15 or even $300 is way below the "$1500 UDRP filing fee" risk threshold. A $10,000 name might require more (expensive) protection against reverse hijacking attempts. This one is a biggie, IMO.


Last edited by Reece : 06-28-2008 at 01:54 AM. Reason: edit: small typo + mistake fixed.
Reece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 02:11 AM   · #10
filter
Domain Wanker
 
filter's Avatar
 
Name: Dan
Location: San Francisco
Trader Rating: (127)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,612
NP$: 1.33 (Donate)
filter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond repute
Parkinson's Disease Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS) Autism Alzheimer's
good stuff Reece, numbers add up ... (calculations starting to approach Black-Scholes territory, LOL)

Well - will be interesting to take a look back at this analysis 10 or even 5 years from now ...
__________________
Impurities.Info <- make offer!
filter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 02:44 AM   · #11
Reece
BQB.com Inc.
 
Reece's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (126)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,867
NP$: 2730.00 (Donate)
Reece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond repute
Member of the Month
January 2008 Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty
Yes, thanks for keeping me honest in regards to renewal fees Dan.

The higher the rate of appreciation, the more it tips in an LLLL.coms's favor (eg. renewal fee makes up a lower portion of the overall value). Conversely, the lower the rate of appreciation, the more apparent it becomes than an LLL.com is a better investment.

My calculation makes a very large assumption that such an interest rate is possible which we really won't know until we look back 5-10 years from now

The LLLL.com has considerable more risk involved, as is evident by the recurring renewal fees. What is $15 today will require an investment of $103 to breakeven 10 years from now -- not at all a small amount and something to carefully consider before investing in LLLL.coms.

I really wouldn't recommend investing in the low end of the LLLL.com market unless one anticipates $250+ prices 10 years from now -- when inflation and opportunity costs are accounted for, it just doesn't make sense to invest in these according to the math above unless one truly believes that $250+ come 10 years from now is what we should expect.

Would, Should, Could... All we can do is wait I'm afraid

Should be some fun times ahead!

Originally Posted by filter
good stuff Reece, numbers add up ... (calculations starting to approach Black-Scholes territory, LOL)

Well - will be interesting to take a look back at this analysis 10 or even 5 years from now ...

Reece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 03:28 AM   · #12
filter
Domain Wanker
 
filter's Avatar
 
Name: Dan
Location: San Francisco
Trader Rating: (127)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,612
NP$: 1.33 (Donate)
filter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond reputefilter has a reputation beyond repute
Parkinson's Disease Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS) Autism Alzheimer's
also interesting to look at the path of ROI from $15 with the "pay renewal every year" scenario

year 1
$15 * 1.35 = $20.25
(total cost original $15 + $7 renewal = $22 ... so "ROI" something like negative 8%)

year 2
$20.25 * 1.35 = $27.34
(total cost original $15 + ($7 + $7.49 renewal) = $29.49 ... "ROI" negative 7.3%)

year 3
$27.34 * 1.35 = $36.91
(total cost original $15 + ($7 + $7.49 + $8.01 renewal) = $37.50 ... "ROI" negative 1.6%)

year 4
$36.91 * 1.35 = $49.83
(total cost original $15 + ($7 + $7.49 + $8.01 + $8.58 renewal) = $46.08 ... ROI positive 8.14% ... finally!)

year 5
$49.83 * 1.35 = $67.27
(total cost original $15 + ($7 + $7.49 + $8.01 + $8.58 + $9.18 renewal) = $55.26)

year 6
$67.27 * 1.35 = $90.81
(total cost $15 + 49.44 accumulated renewal = $64.44)

year 7
$90.81 * 1.35 = $122.59
(total cost $15 + $58.62 accumulated renewal = $73.62)

year 8
$122.59 * 1.35 = $165.50
(total cost $15 + $67.80 accumulated renewal = $82.80)

year 9
$165.50 * 1.35 = $223.43
(total cost $15 + $76.98 accumulated renewal = $91.98)

year 10
$223.43 * 1.35 = $301.63
... etc.

Well then ... based on these assumptions - hard to make a rational argument to rush into low-end LLLL.com - seems like one could hold off buying for 3 years and still come out with a better ROI.

But speculative markets aren't always so rational, so who knows how and when (and whether) the low end will move. Renewal fees do seem to be a big drag - unless prices make a quantum leap to $40+ (again!) ...
__________________
Impurities.Info <- make offer!

Last edited by filter : 06-28-2008 at 03:53 AM. Reason: corrected estimated renewal fee in year 4+
filter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 03:35 AM   · #13
Reece
BQB.com Inc.
 
Reece's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (126)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,867
NP$: 2730.00 (Donate)
Reece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond reputeReece has a reputation beyond repute
Member of the Month
January 2008 Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty
You're 100% right Dan -- the optimal time to invest may very well be 2-3 years away. The higher the price an LLLL.com goes for, the less of an impact renewals have, so it's only logical that there's considerably less risk involved in investing (and renewing) LLLL.coms when the market is (stable) at $40+ than at present.

Originally Posted by filter
also interesting to look at the path of ROI from $15 with the "pay ren