| | |||||
| ||||||||
| "Short" Domain Discussion Generally defined as easily resalable domains of 5 characters or less -- LLL, LLLL, L-L-L, 2c, 3c, acronyms, etc |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | THREAD STARTER #1 (permalink) | ||||
| Domain Wanker Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,593
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | LLLL.com market "timing"![]() I posted this in the LLLL.com sales report thread - now thinking it may be an interesting topic for some more random discussion here so as not too clutter up that busy thread too much more! http://www.namepros.com/2319742-post251.html
![]() ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/short-domain-discussion/395119-llll-com-market-timing.html The "unlikely for stable pattern to persist since it will be predictably traded into non-existance" is just one (old but solid) school of thought. It is based in part on the assumption that financial markets are shaped primarily by the aggregation of many individual decisions based on rational calculations. In reality there are many other factors in play in most markets at any given time - and the basic assumption that groups of individuals will tend to make purely rational calculated economic decisions is questionable to say the least. (Google "behavioral economics" for more on that angle ...) Given that in some markets (such as commodities trading and foreign exchange) so-called "technical analysis" often trumps "fundamental" (bottom-line "earnings-ratio" and dividends type analysis - ie more along the lines of traffic and PPC revenue in domainers' universe) ... seems like the LLLL.com might be one of those types of markets where "technical" analysis of price movements might be usefully applied - or at least would be an interesting exercise. ![]() Anyone care to share more ideas along these lines ? | ||||
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 976
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Market timing is difficult in most markets. For example, in stocks and other financial instruments, the typical price pattern is saw-tooth: Long ramps up in price followed by quick declines. Other things to consider are the usual difficulties in detecting a known pattern. For example, the famous "head and shoulders" pattern in markets are best identified after a change in the second derivative on the third "hump" in the proposed head and shoulders pattern, and even then it is hard to tell whether this is a real inflection prior to a market correction, or just a temporary slow down that will be followed by other price increases (digesting the market moves before moving on). ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=395119 I don't know if I agree on the statement that technical trading trumps fundamentals. In the markets I look at the charts for timing and hints of future market moves, and then if I see something interesting I look at fundamentals to confirm a buy/sell. In the recent markets we saw this when the DOW was around 14000 a few months ago. The charts didn't look that strong, and the market fundamentals looked worse, so I moved to cash. Also, all the market analysts were screaming DOW 15000 as we were hitting 14000, and getting all glassy eyed. We see some of this glassy eyed speculation in some domain extensions and categories... which is a warning sign. As they say in the markets "trees don't grow to the sky". Marc
__________________ . (Just another mathematician obsessed with proving P != NP -- that is a math joke for job security) Smile! In a few short years you will realize that these are the good old days! |
| |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,299
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | There is a fundamental (!) difference from the stock / bond market - Domains are individual, both in that each is different (although there are rough categories), and more importantly for this discussion, each sale/buy is different. You may, in todays LLLL.com market sell a lower grade name for two or three times as much if you are willing to put a little time and effort into it. And as someone mentioned in another thread, you incur a substantial penalty for selling a large number of domains at the same time. Small investors can use these conditions to their advantage by buying low and selling high, but I don't think larger investors could move in and out easily enough to be worth while. |
| |
| | THREAD STARTER #4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Domain Wanker Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,593
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Excellent points - thanks for sharing your insight! I think this is fascinating stuff, and the LLLL.com market may be a great laboratory in which to study some of these ideas.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=395119 ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=395119 so prices usually move much faster when going downhill than when going up.
Not to mention the issues of reflexivity and stationarity - it's difficult to get a good bead on a constantly moving target, especially when your own actions may influence the market's movement.
(unless you are the one who is paying them to give you the straight dope rather than the BS they peddle for public consumption - hopefully you'll get what you paid for sometimes ...)
So if every "reg-fee" LLLL.com is expected to double in value with each passing month ... then would work out to a multiple of 4096 at the end of a year. Hard to see that happening - ie, about $30,000 per domain for each and every XWQZ.com etc (on top of the $10,000,000 for the handful or so of special cases such as PORN.com etc) = about 14 Billion dollars with nothing better to do ... So obviously there's going to come a point, probably sooner rather than later, where expectations of "doubling your investment in a month" meet with disappointment - and speculators will then be looking to move their capital into whatever the next hot thing is, and they will be quick to either take profits or cut their losses without a second thought ... | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 976
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | filter, I think we are in agreement on the market dynamics here. As for accentnepal's comments, I would say that even though each domain is different, in aggregate there is enough information for classic market psychology to take place... and for the tools used in evaluating the effects of market psychology on the market to be somewhat valid. We have seen this in both the extensions and in the categories. For example, I am .mobi neutral. I own a few, but overall neutral. The one thing I have noticed though is that the recent sales have stimulated a .mobi rush. Maybe it is a bubble, maybe it is real, only time will tell, but there does appear to be some mass psychology operating in this area. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=395119 The one thing that is fairly constant throughout all markets is the role of mass psychology in determining market movements. When it comes time to sell then everybody heads for the door at once. You are right about fear being a primary factor in major market moves, and domains are not immune to psychology and statistics. It would be funny if some of the major technical trading books are republished with a domain market spin. Marc
__________________ . (Just another mathematician obsessed with proving P != NP -- that is a math joke for job security) Smile! In a few short years you will realize that these are the good old days! |
| |
| | THREAD STARTER #6 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Domain Wanker Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,593
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=395119
I think that the current LLLL market may be the first time this type of "analysis" (if you will) can begin to be applied - given the possibly large-enough yet still very finite quantity and more easily quantifiable qualities of relative letter frequencies (etc, etc) ... LLL and CCC may have paved the way but the sample size was I think much too small to get a good handle on mass market dynamics ... But I really am just talking out my ass about most of this stuff !!! | ||||||||
| |