Bad LLL.com or Good LLL.net ?

groundctrl · 04-24-2007, 11:01 AM

I think this was asked already on DNForum but wanted to pose it here.

Assuming equal pricing, which would you choose: A bad LLL.com (low quality letters, i.e. XVZ.com) or a good quality LLL.net? Which will increase more over time? Which one can you more easily flip?

Fewski · 04-24-2007, 11:06 AM

I would prefer a good .NET over a bad .COM. .NET are pretty good with pricing, and if you can get something like "BEO.NET" compared to "XZV.COM" the .NET is better, IMO.

groundctrl · 04-24-2007, 11:08 AM

you'll forgive me if i ask a lot of n00b questions here, but i've been reading a lot of Frank Schilling, who's obsession with .COMs is probably well known here. how do you think that carries over into LLL's that have no specific meaning?

chicker · 04-24-2007, 11:09 AM

I am not sure on that, I would probably preffer the .com as their are only a rare few of them and although it is may be bad it could have its uses, it really depends on the .net in question though as their prices are rising

***Domainate.com*** · 04-24-2007, 11:12 AM

"Assuming equal pricing" makes it easy: A Good LLL.net. IMO, junk LLL .com names are ugly and not brandable or really developable on, so since a good LLL.net should have a whole lot of acronym possibilities, it has a better chance of finding an end-user.

Figuring out which LLL.net would be good enough to be $3,500+ on the other hand would be the difficult part.

Smooth · 04-24-2007, 11:15 AM

Good Acronym LLL.net < Bad LLL.com

Dict word LLL.net >= Bad LLL.com

tetrapak · 04-24-2007, 12:05 PM

Good lll.net anytime. The chance of finding an end user is 20 times bigger for a good lll.net than for a bad (xzy) lll.com. Also a good lll.net is likely to rise more in value than a bad lll.com imo.

Spade · 04-24-2007, 12:42 PM

Originally Posted by Smooth

Good Acronym LLL.net < Bad LLL.com

Dict word LLL.net >= Bad LLL.com

Agreed. I think just a solid letter .net would be difficult to brand, as any reputable company would prefer hands down the com. However, the word .net would be substancially easier to pick then a LLL.com

groundctrl · 04-24-2007, 02:10 PM

this is a super insightful thread. thanks guys. anything else?

Web Master · 04-24-2007, 02:17 PM

Please be generous to give your bad LLL.com, please

I want all bad LLL.com. To me all bad LLL.coms are

Please make no mistakes: bad LLL.com is the higher level than Good LLL.net, generally.

This should not be a question to ask. Everyone knows .Com is better than .Net, generally.

Sam · 04-24-2007, 03:48 PM

Good LLL.net - maybe $1k-2k
Bad LLL.com - $3k minum

Its obvious

***Domainate.com*** · 04-24-2007, 05:14 PM

Originally Posted by damitssam

Good LLL.net - maybe $1k-2k
Bad LLL.com - $3k minum

Its obvious

Read the post. "Assuming equal pricing". In other words, a good enough LLL.net to be worth the minimum wholesale of LLL.com.

VURG · 04-24-2007, 06:44 PM

I think the important thing to recognise here is that the domains are worth the same amount.

Bad LLL.com will have a low range in selling price:* $3000 - $7000+
Good LLL.net will have a higher range in selling price:* $1200 - $50000+

To a domain trader who knows how to find endusers and balance their budget, the LLL.net is the better option as there is more profit to be made. There are more endusers who will pay the maximum.

To a novice domainer who is having difficulties balancing their budget, the LLL.com is the better option. A rushed sale due to money needs with the LLL.net will be harder work to get the $3500 the domain is worth.

To me, I don't look for endusers and so I would prefer the LLL.com if I wanted to use for reselling purposes and the LLL.net for developement purposes.

Personally, I think that the decision depends on the person. You would probably find a lot more people who will take the LLL.com but in the right hands the LLL.net has more potential.

*My personal estimates on what I would expect that a domain to sell for. The LLL.com has a larger market with a higher minimum sale price and is hard work to get more than 100% profit with. Good LLL.net has a smaller market with a lower minimum price but with a lot more endusers who will pay more than 500% profit on a sale.

htmlindex · 04-24-2007, 08:59 PM

I'd go with a good LLL.net IMO

sibaong · 04-24-2007, 11:29 PM

Bad LLL .com

or Best LLL .net

I'll take both (Minimum Wholesale Price)

04-24-2007, 11:01 AM	THREAD STARTER #1 (permalink)
groundctrl NamePros Regular Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 245	Bad LLL.com or Good LLL.net ? I think this was asked already on DNForum but wanted to pose it here. Assuming equal pricing, which would you choose: A bad LLL.com (low quality letters, i.e. XVZ.com) or a good quality LLL.net? Which will increase more over time? Which one can you more easily flip?

04-24-2007, 11:06 AM	#2 (permalink)
Fewski Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Florida Posts: 2,617	I would prefer a good .NET over a bad .COM. .NET are pretty good with pricing, and if you can get something like "BEO.NET" compared to "XZV.COM" the .NET is better, IMO. __________________ Bantimurung objek wisata terbaik di sulawesi selatan

04-24-2007, 11:12 AM	#5 (permalink)
*Domainate.com* Domain Seller & Expert Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: San Diego, CA, USA Posts: 3,778 Follow @nametrader	"Assuming equal pricing" makes it easy: A Good LLL.net. IMO, junk LLL .com names are ugly and not brandable or really developable on, so since a good LLL.net should have a whole lot of acronym possibilities, it has a better chance of finding an end-user. Figuring out which LLL.net would be good enough to be $3,500+ on the other hand would be the difficult part. __________________ NEW: Database of 35,000+ available domains including many high search, high CPC! Weekly Domain Special: BlogPostWriters.com, CasualLiving.org + 28 more domains for sale! Join our Doma.in Newsletter for discounted domains and training! \| Twitter \| Facebook Read my published Business Insider article, 10 Myths About The New Top-Level Domains

04-24-2007, 11:15 AM	#6 (permalink)
Smooth ccTLD Specialist Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 832	Good Acronym LLL.net < Bad LLL.com Dict word LLL.net >= Bad LLL.com __________________ All offers from me are valid for 24 Hrs unless otherwise noted.

04-24-2007, 12:05 PM	#7 (permalink)
tetrapak Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Dubayy / Budapest Posts: 2,905	Good lll.net anytime. The chance of finding an end user is 20 times bigger for a good lll.net than for a bad (xzy) lll.com. Also a good lll.net is likely to rise more in value than a bad lll.com imo. __________________ Dubai Marina

04-24-2007, 11:08 AM	THREAD STARTER #3 (permalink)
groundctrl NamePros Regular Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 245	you'll forgive me if i ask a lot of n00b questions here, but i've been reading a lot of Frank Schilling, who's obsession with .COMs is probably well known here. how do you think that carries over into LLL's that have no specific meaning?

04-24-2007, 11:09 AM	#4 (permalink)
chicker NamePros Regular Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: England Posts: 722	I am not sure on that, I would probably preffer the .com as their are only a rare few of them and although it is may be bad it could have its uses, it really depends on the .net in question though as their prices are rising

04-24-2007, 02:10 PM	THREAD STARTER #9 (permalink)
groundctrl NamePros Regular Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 245	this is a super insightful thread. thanks guys. anything else?

04-24-2007, 02:17 PM	#10 (permalink)
Web Master Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: www.Shelter-Your-Domains.zor.org Posts: 1,570	Please be generous to give your bad LLL.com, please I want all bad LLL.com. To me all bad LLL.coms are Please make no mistakes: bad LLL.com is the higher level than Good LLL.net, generally. This should not be a question to ask. Everyone knows .Com is better than .Net, generally.

04-24-2007, 03:48 PM	#11 (permalink)
Sam Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 3,435	Good LLL.net - maybe $1k-2k Bad LLL.com - $3k minum Its obvious __________________ SPECIAL: The World's BEST Single Letter Domain Sale! Lowest single letter price on the market! Starting at $799

04-24-2007, 06:44 PM	#13 (permalink)
VURG VURG Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 2,606	I think the important thing to recognise here is that the domains are worth the same amount. Bad LLL.com will have a low range in selling price:* $3000 - $7000+ Good LLL.net will have a higher range in selling price:* $1200 - $50000+ To a domain trader who knows how to find endusers and balance their budget, the LLL.net is the better option as there is more profit to be made. There are more endusers who will pay the maximum. To a novice domainer who is having difficulties balancing their budget, the LLL.com is the better option. A rushed sale due to money needs with the LLL.net will be harder work to get the $3500 the domain is worth. To me, I don't look for endusers and so I would prefer the LLL.com if I wanted to use for reselling purposes and the LLL.net for developement purposes. Personally, I think that the decision depends on the person. You would probably find a lot more people who will take the LLL.com but in the right hands the LLL.net has more potential. *My personal estimates on what I would expect that a domain to sell for. The LLL.com has a larger market with a higher minimum sale price and is hard work to get more than 100% profit with. Good LLL.net has a smaller market with a lower minimum price but with a lot more endusers who will pay more than 500% profit on a sale.

04-24-2007, 08:59 PM	#14 (permalink)
htmlindex NamePros Legend Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 14,241	I'd go with a good LLL.net IMO __________________ GEO Sale!! - $15 each

04-24-2007, 11:29 PM	#15 (permalink)
sibaong NamePros Fansâ„¢ Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: NamePros Posts: 2,736	Bad LLL .com or Best LLL .net I'll take both (Minimum Wholesale Price) __________________ Charity Ribbons - Together, We Create A Special World!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)