NamePros
Welcome, Guest! Ready to make a name for yourself in the domain business? We welcome both the hobbyist and professional domainer to join the discussion as part of the NamePros community.

Click here to create your profile to start earning reputation for posting, and trader ratings for buying & selling in our free e-marketplace. Build your trader rating with each successful sale. Our system has tracked over 100,000 sales and counting!
FAQ & TOS Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   NamePros.com > Website Development Discussion Forums > Search Engines
Reload this Page Which is better for SEO

Search Engines Discussion about Search Engines and SEO.

Advanced Search
4 members in live chat ~  


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-11-2010, 06:57 PM THREAD STARTER               #1 (permalink)
First Time Poster!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1
eprog is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Which is better for SEO


I am registering a domain for a new site. For example, my target keyword is weight lost. WeightLost.com or Weight-Lost.com, which is better for SEO? Or they are just the same for SEO.

Thank you!
eprog is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 08:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In Free Fall
Posts: 1,159
TestCase is a splendid one to beholdTestCase is a splendid one to beholdTestCase is a splendid one to beholdTestCase is a splendid one to beholdTestCase is a splendid one to beholdTestCase is a splendid one to beholdTestCase is a splendid one to behold
 



Originally Posted by eprog View Post
I am registering a domain for a new site. For example, my target keyword is weight lost. WeightLost.com or Weight-Lost.com, which is better for SEO? Or they are just the same for SEO.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/search-engines/639300-which-is-better-search-engine-optimization.html

Thank you!
First off, the SEO value of a domain is only one (very small) factor in search engine algorithms. If you are serious about building a long term, successful site, I always go with the non-hyphenated version if it available because:
  • Most people are used to all words running together in a domain name, not separating them with hyphens.
  • Most hyphenated domains (in my experience) tend to be spammy so I automatically approach them very cautiously -- or not at all.
  • If you don't get the non-hyphenated version and leave it behind, somebody else might pick it up and ride your coattails of success with your site -- much to your detriment. (Sometimes this is referred to as, "leakage" or "bleed".) Kind of like people going to WhiteHouse.COM instead of WhiteHouse.GOV.

Your mileage may very...

Ps. By the way, I do own a handful of very targeted hyphenated names that used to rank quite well (pg 1 or 2) on Yahoo & MSN (but never Google) for their first couple of years, but they don't even come up in the top 10 pages anymore. Yet, I still have non-hyphenated dn's that are less targeted/keyword rich in the same niche that are usually on pages 1 or 2 on Yahoo, MSN AND Google for the primary keyword/phrases.
TestCase is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 09:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
bizcorp's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 419
bizcorp has a spectacular aura aboutbizcorp has a spectacular aura about
 



I would always choose the unhyphenated domain over the hyphenated domain name. in my opinion it is better for SEO. Also in terms of resale value, the unhyphenated domain name will sell for more as well.
bizcorp is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 11:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 260
jondoe0069 is a jewel in the roughjondoe0069 is a jewel in the roughjondoe0069 is a jewel in the rough
 


Animal Rescue
Originally Posted by TestCase View Post
First off, the SEO value of a domain is only one (very small) factor in search engine algorithms.
I focus more on SEO than domaining and I would highly disagree with this statement. Google's algorithm puts a great deal of weight on keywords in the domain, especially exact keyword match domains. Yahoo and Bing give even more weight in my experience. From all the testing I've done, even the extension matters noticeably. I have had exact match .info names with no other extensions developed have trouble ranking in Google, while my exact match .com names with more competition for the keyword rank much more easily. I'm not sure why this is, but my theory is that the algorithm basically says- if you've captured the flag (exact keyword match .com domain) and have your other on-page SEO ducks in a row, you must be pretty authoritative for that keyword and you start with an advantage.

Think about it - if you have the exact match .com in a competitive niche, you were either in that niche early or invested a good amount of money into acquiring the domain. I don't see how any good SE algorithm wouldn't put a good amount of weight on this factor based on the seriousness about the keyword/ niche it displays.

I'm not saying it's the biggest part of the algo, but it's definitely very important and gives you an advantage.

Back to the original question - no dashes. Search engines are great at picking words out of a URL and Google is getting really good at matching words up with synonyms in context to find other relevant results. Dashes should be looked at like .info domains or any other domain that is likely to be available for a lot of good keyword phrases... spammers tend to use them a lot, so they likely pull less weight in helping you rank. Also, if you want return visitors, dashes will kill you.

Nothing against .info or dashes though. I own plenty of both, but I would trade them in any day for the no dash .com versions.
jondoe0069 is offline  
Old 02-12-2010, 07:16 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,634
DubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant futureDubDubDubDot has a brilliant future
 



Originally Posted by jondoe0069 View Post
Google's algorithm puts a great deal of weight on keywords in the domain, especially exact keyword match domains.
This was mentioned in another thread, so I'll quote my reply there here also...

Originally Posted by DubDubDubDot View Post
The Summit study used 9,000 keyword searches and found that having a keyword in the URL made little difference. Only 6% of results on the first three pages had the keyword(s) in the URL. If keyword domains had the SEO advantage that many domainers claim, this number should be much higher.
Originally Posted by jondoe0069 View Post
I have had exact match .info names with no other extensions developed have trouble ranking in Google,
How old were your .info domains when you noticed this? IMO Google may not trust .info until it has some age. We know that they penalize .coms for having too many hyphens since that is the mark of a spammer, so there is no reason why they wouldn't do the same for a period of time with .info since they cost so little and are indeed a popular choice for shady webmasters as pump & dump domains.
DubDubDubDot is offline  
Old 02-12-2010, 11:09 AM   #6 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 260
jondoe0069 is a jewel in the roughjondoe0069 is a jewel in the roughjondoe0069 is a jewel in the rough
 


Animal Rescue
Originally Posted by DubDubDubDot View Post
This was mentioned in another thread, so I'll quote my reply there here also...
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=639300




How old were your .info domains when you noticed this? IMO Google may not trust .info until it has some age. We know that they penalize .coms for having too many hyphens since that is the mark of a spammer, so there is no reason why they wouldn't do the same for a period of time with .info since they cost so little and are indeed a popular choice for shady webmasters as pump & dump domains.
I should have clarified. Everything I said was basically based on brand new domains. I don't disagree that an aged .info is not that difficult to get moving up the ranks. I do have .info names that I developed more than a year or two ago that do well in the rankings for their target keywords.
jondoe0069 is offline  
Old 02-12-2010, 11:20 AM   #7 (permalink)
NamePros Expert
 
stub's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,313
stub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatnessstub Has achieved greatness
 



I would register both domains and forward the hyphenated domain to the non-hyphenated domain.
stub is offline  
Old 02-12-2010, 03:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
Forum Moderator
 
enlytend's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,152
enlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond reputeenlytend has a reputation beyond repute
 



Cancer Survivorship
Quote:
The Summit study used 9,000 keyword searches and found that having a keyword in the URL made little difference. Only 6% of results on the first three pages had the keyword(s) in the URL.
With all due respect, I believe that piece of data from their study (which was designed to point out differences between Caffiene and classic "Vanilla" Google results, not as a comparison of the effectiveness of keyword vs non keyword domains) only shows prevalence of keyword url's in the SERPS - nothing more.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=639300

Among other things, there's no data as to whether the domains corresponding to those 9000 keywords are parked, developed, or even registered - or if developed, how effectively the respective domains have dealt with off-page factors and other on-page factors which would contribute to good rankings. You'd need to have those controls in the study for it to prove/disprove anything about the relative strength of keyword domains as a ranking factor.

General consensus is that keyword(s) in domain is currently one powerful, on-page ranking factor, BUT, it's just one ingredient in the soup. It helps, it's not a guarantee and it certainly isn't a necessity.

Answer to the original question: Either is fine, the non-hyphenated version is better for visitors.
__________________
Enlytend Solutions - Internet marketing and web development
Was my advice helpful? Please consider a small donation to the National Canine Cancer Foundation - a tax deductible 501(c)(3)that directly funds cancer research
Last edited by enlytend; 02-12-2010 at 03:43 PM.
enlytend is offline  
Old 02-13-2010, 03:14 AM   #9 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 65
varunsharma23 is an unknown quantity at this point
 



weightloss is the best for SEO
varunsharma23 is offline  
Old 02-13-2010, 04:10 AM   #10 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
amelia20 is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Obviously weightlost is much more preferable than the hyphenated one.
__________________
Hire PHP Programmer
amelia20 is offline  
Old 02-14-2010, 11:43 AM   #11 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 260
jondoe0069 is a jewel in the roughjondoe0069 is a jewel in the roughjondoe0069 is a jewel in the rough
 


Animal Rescue
Originally Posted by enlytend View Post
General consensus is that keyword(s) in domain is currently one powerful, on-page ranking factor, BUT, it's just one ingredient in the soup. It helps, it's not a guarantee and it certainly isn't a necessity.
I think it is one of the major ingredients in the soup. It definitely starts you off with a big advantage. I recently picked up the .com of a client's number one keyword and threw up a quick informational site with all other on page SEO done. As soon as it was indexed, it moved quickly past a lot of the competition (first page) who all had pretty good on page SEO targeting the exact keyword and several links pointed to their sites. No sandbox either. The rank has held and is slowly moving up as I build links.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=639300

There are several other factors and someone without the keyword in their domain could outrank me if they put enough effort into it, but I think it starts you off with a huge advantage to have an exact match domain or at least have the major keyword(s) in your domain (without being spammy of course).
jondoe0069 is offline  
Old 02-14-2010, 02:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: arizona
Posts: 137
Mesa SEO Solutions is on a distinguished road
 



Search engines have gotten so sophisticated over the years that it really doesn't make any difference. I do not use - in the domain name, but I do for individual pages. I do this for the searcher and not the search engine.
Mesa SEO Solutions is offline  
Old 02-15-2010, 06:28 PM   #13 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
AbsoluteKC's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 980
AbsoluteKC is a splendid one to beholdAbsoluteKC is a splendid one to beholdAbsoluteKC is a splendid one to beholdAbsoluteKC is a splendid one to beholdAbsoluteKC is a splendid one to beholdAbsoluteKC is a splendid one to beholdAbsoluteKC is a splendid one to behold
 



Dashes should not have any impact on SEO but for branding purposes, yes!
AbsoluteKC is offline  
Old 02-15-2010, 10:55 PM   #14 (permalink)
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8
Khamed is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Originally Posted by amelia20 View Post
Obviously weightlost is much more preferable than the hyphenated one.
Agree with You..
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=639300
How about if some popular phrase already taken by other people, and idea?
Thanks
__________________
Regards,
Khamed
High Payout Affiliate
Khamed is offline  
Old 02-19-2010, 02:14 AM   #15 (permalink)
Account Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russia
Posts: 622
andr69 is a jewel in the roughandr69 is a jewel in the roughandr69 is a jewel in the rough
 



Originally Posted by eprog View Post
I am registering a domain for a new site. For example, my target keyword is weight lost. WeightLost.com or Weight-Lost.com, which is better for SEO? Or they are just the same for SEO.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=639300

Thank you!
To my mind the best variant in your case will be weightlost or weightloosing, because your potential customers will hardly embarrass themselves printing "Weight-Lost". I can give you one advice about generating keywords: always remember about your customers - how are they going to search for necessary information?
andr69 is offline  
Old 02-20-2010, 12:12 AM   #16 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 566
weblaunch is on a distinguished road
 



Non-hyphenated is a better choice. Domain names are very important for ranking well but they're not the only factor. That said, I don't think many people will go to search engines to search for "weight lost" or "lost weight". I would look instead for names containing "lose weight" or "weight loss".
weblaunch is offline  
Old 02-21-2010, 08:09 PM   #17 (permalink)
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
pwslinks is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Domain Name Registration


For me, a domain name without any special character is an advantage....although your domain name is not that a big factor to rank your website, but for the users, its easier if the word doesn't contain any special character....
pwslinks is offline  
Old 02-23-2010, 12:30 AM   #18 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
Dirky47's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 395
Dirky47 has a spectacular aura aboutDirky47 has a spectacular aura about
 



I will definitely use the unhyphenated domain name for you.
__________________
Dog Car Seats | Retriever Trainer | PetSafe
Dirky47 is offline  
Old 03-01-2010, 11:41 PM   #19 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
Hafsoh's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 349
Hafsoh is an unknown quantity at this point
 



The problem with hyphens in domain names is visitors might get confused and enter the wrong URL, domain names without hyphens are easier to spell, read aloud, and remember when you're talking directly to another person. However, hyphens do seem to add legibility in print and in link text.
Hyphenated name is easier to read, un-hyphenated domain name is easier to type.
Hyphenated names are SEO friendly as long as the URL or hyperlink do not include the strings or dynamic URL.
Hafsoh is offline  
Old 03-10-2010, 02:43 AM   #20 (permalink)
New Member
 
vishal9717's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Delhi, India
Posts: 14
vishal9717 is an unknown quantity at this point
 




Hi there

Domain name should be in small and running form not in hyphenated type.
__________________
Hi i am Vishal working as a marketing executive in Web Design India.
vishal9717 is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 07:25 AM   #21 (permalink)
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
linkmoko is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Which is better for SEO


For me which is better for SEO is quality content and good quality backlinks for SEO.
__________________
Blogtonic |
linkmoko is offline  
Old 03-21-2010, 11:56 PM   #22 (permalink)
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2
lymanjayan is an unknown quantity at this point
 



You should choose only high rankings keywords for domain name.

Weight loss is better. Only one keywords should be in domain names.
__________________
r4
lymanjayan is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 12:22 PM   #23 (permalink)
NamePros Member
 
King.content's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fiction House, Binary Valley.
Posts: 37
King.content is on a distinguished road
 



u need to make sure that the keyword you select is highly researched. In case you do not get the exact keyword for the domain name (which might be the chance) you should look out for the next keywords. Only when all your keywords are exhausted and are taken, should you use the hyphen domain names from the beginning. Hyphens do not add any value to the domain name and act as a hitch to the search engine engine bots, hence they are not preferred by the users and search engines.
__________________
Published over 500 articles online.
Contact for as much content as you want.
$5 for 500 words. Selling premium domains real cheap.!! Contact on email.!
King.content is offline  
Old 03-28-2010, 06:07 PM   #24 (permalink)
Account Closed
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MASS
Posts: 185
TechGuy1 is an unknown quantity at this point
 




Originally Posted by jondoe0069 View Post
I focus more on SEO than domaining and I would highly disagree with this statement. Google's algorithm puts a great deal of weight on keywords in the domain, especially exact keyword match domains. Yahoo and Bing give even more weight in my experience. From all the testing I've done, even the extension matters noticeably. I have had exact match .info names with no other extensions developed have trouble ranking in Google, while my exact match .com names with more competition for the keyword rank much more easily. I'm not sure why this is, but my theory is that the algorithm basically says- if you've captured the flag (exact keyword match .com domain) and have your other on-page SEO ducks in a row, you must be pretty authoritative for that keyword and you start with an advantage.

Think about it - if you have the exact match .com in a competitive niche, you were either in that niche early or invested a good amount of money into acquiring the domain. I don't see how any good SE algorithm wouldn't put a good amount of weight on this factor based on the seriousness about the keyword/ niche it displays.

I'm not saying it's the biggest part of the algo, but it's definitely very important and gives you an advantage.

Back to the original question - no dashes. Search engines are great at picking words out of a URL and Google is getting really good at matching words up with synonyms in context to find other relevant results. Dashes should be looked at like .info domains or any other domain that is likely to be available for a lot of good keyword phrases... spammers tend to use them a lot, so they likely pull less weight in helping you rank. Also, if you want return visitors, dashes will kill you.

Nothing against .info or dashes though. I own plenty of both, but I would trade them in any day for the no dash .com versions.
Couldnt agree more. Domain names are huge for SEO for that keyword. For instance, I have a site called cheapplrarticles.net. The first day it was indexed, I was 3rd for "cheap plr articles"
TechGuy1 is offline  
Old 03-31-2010, 04:58 PM   #25 (permalink)
First Time Poster!
 
vnpt_adsl's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 1
vnpt_adsl is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Originally Posted by eprog View Post
I am registering a domain for a new site. For example, my target keyword is weight lost. WeightLost.com or Weight-Lost.com, which is better for SEO? Or they are just the same for SEO.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=639300

Thank you!
WeightLost.com and Weight-Lost.com are the same for SEO but WeightLost.com is more professional and it'll attract the impression of the visistor.
__________________
megavnn
vnpt_adsl is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


 
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 PM.

Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com Powered by: vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 Ad Management plugin by RedTyger