| |||||||
| Programming PHP, Perl, Ruby on Rails, AJAX, HTML, XHTML, CSS, JavaScript, MySQL and any other coding topics. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| New Member | Is "make" still a good site building tool? My setup: I've got a 100+ file site that is XML-based. I use XSL to generate HTML files. I wrote a DOS batch file that generates all the HTML files at once. The problem: When Dreamweaver syncs my local site with the live site, it sees that all the HTML files' dates have changed, and so uploads the entire site, which takes a long time. My thoughts: I'm thinking about using make to manage the XSL transformations and the uploads. Basically, I'd like to define my site's file dependencies and tranformation/upload operations so that only those files that need to be generated will be generated, and then uploaded. The thing is, I haven't used make in a couple years. Back then, I was using java, and "ant" was recommended. I liked ant's xml formatting, but it seemed (and still seems) very java-centric. My question: What's a good make-like tool for managing a web site's XLS tranformation and file uploads? Is make still the best (read: most flexible and reliable in the long term) way to go? Or are there new make-like tools that are easier, more popular, and more portable? Thanks a ton! Travis |
| |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |