| | |||||
| ||||||||
| Marketing Techniques Promotion and sales strategies, search engines and other online selling techniques. |
| View Poll Results: Public access or registration-only | |||
| Public access | | 0 | 0% |
| Access after registration | | 0 | 0% |
| Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | THREAD STARTER #1 (permalink) |
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 972
![]() ![]() | Public access or not Hi, ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/marketing-techniques/255724-public-access-or-not.html I am currently evaluating whether CityPics should allow public access to its high resolution photos or not. Initially when CityPics started its photos were available to the public without any prior registration. Shortly afterwards I have read several times the suggestion to make it registration-only to give people an incentive to register and so I eventually switched to the current system. Of course some people opted for public access too and gave other arguments. At the end I'd prefer public access too, but I am worrying that CityPics would become a little loader paradise without getting anything in return. I'd like to hear your opinion on this matter (please vote too). Would public access be a better incentive for registration and participation? Is mandatory registration a good way to increase the number of users? Would public access only attract more loaders without any real increase of members? Thanks! |
| |