[advanced search]
Results from the most recent live auction are here.
14 members in the live chat room. Join Chat!
Register Rules & FAQ NP$ Store Active Threads Mark Forums Read
Go Back   NamePros.Com > Domain Names > Industry News
User Name
Password

BQB.com - No Commission Domain Name Auctions
Forum Sponsor
BQB is a next generation domain name auction platform dedicated to domains of all extensions, specializing in domains of 5 characters or less.

Old 07-21-2008, 05:38 AM   · #1
WhoNet
NamePros Regular
 
WhoNet's Avatar
 
Name: Lee
Location: IDN Club
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 330
NP$: 435.00 (Donate)
WhoNet will become famous soon enoughWhoNet will become famous soon enough
Google Faces Another Click Fraud Suit

Google Faces Another Click Fraud Suit

Wendy Davis, Jul 21, 2008

Quote:
Google has been hit with a second lawsuit for fraud stemming from its parked domains program, which serves ads on otherwise empty Web pages.


This latest suit, brought in federal district court in San Jose, Calif., comes less than one week after attorney Hal Levitte filed a similar case.

In the new lawsuit, online retailer RK West, which operates the online store Malibu Wholesale, alleges it purchased ads Google without realizing they would appear on parked domains. Parked domains typically have no content other than ads. RK West alleges that many of the clicks generated by parked domains are "invalid."

The company said in its lawsuit that it had been charged for clicks from parked domains "that had little relation to its business."

"Despite indication that some of the clicks from parked domains were invalid, Google failed to disclose to the plaintiff specific domain names in which these ads were clicked on, making detection of invalid clicks difficult and even worse concealing any evidence of invalid clicks," the lawsuit alleges. RK West eventually went through its server logs and discovered the source of the clicks, said Alfredo Torrijos, one of the company's attorneys.

RK West does not define "invalid" in the complaint, but Torrijos said the company took the position that clicks made by users who don't have a genuine interest in making a purchase are invalid.

The company has alleged fraudulent concealment, unjust enrichment and a violation of California's business code, and is seeking class-action status.

RK West's lead lawyer, Brian Kabateck of Kabateck Brown Kellner, has a history of bringing click fraud lawsuits, having sued Google, Yahoo and IAC. His law firm settled with Yahoo and joined in a $90 million settlement with Google.

In April he sued Google on behalf of David Almeida, who alleged that Google tricked him into paying for AdSense ads on the company's publisher network, when he only wanted his ads to appear on search results pages.


http://www.mediapost.com/publicatio...e&art_aid=86914


Please register or log-in into NamePros to hide ads
__________________
|Credit・Card.com| 乐.tv | 写真.tv | 销售.WS | 樂.net |Cell・Phone.com|
©|€.net|₡.com|₢.com|₤.net|₦.com|₭.com|₥.net|₮.com|₯ .com|₩.ws|®
WhoNet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 05:57 AM   · #2
Dean26
Senior Member
 
Trader Rating: (32)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,002
NP$: 31.00 (Donate)
Dean26 is a name known to allDean26 is a name known to allDean26 is a name known to allDean26 is a name known to allDean26 is a name known to allDean26 is a name known to all
Google are getting sued left, right and center. Everyone wants a piece of them lol.
Dean26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 06:16 AM   · #3
www.LLLL.com
Coming soon!
 
www.LLLL.com's Avatar
 
Name: Reece Berg
Location: Canada
Trader Rating: (135)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,156
NP$: 296.00 (Donate)
www.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond reputewww.LLLL.com has a reputation beyond repute
Member of the Month
January 2008 Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Protect Our Planet Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty Animal Cruelty
Can't say Google doesn't deserve this...

I find it quite misleading that they automatically opt-in new advertisers to their Search Partners + Content Network... Someone thinks they're advertising on Google and all of the sudden their ads are appearing on other sites.

I like their Content Network myself and have had good results on it but only a fool or someone obviously not aware they're being opted into the Content Network is going to pay $10+/click there...
www.LLLL.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 06:25 AM   · #4
nstalk
NamePros Regular
 
nstalk's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 327
NP$: 100.00 (Donate)
nstalk is a jewel in the roughnstalk is a jewel in the roughnstalk is a jewel in the rough
This is a very serious potential problem for all of us who benefit from ppc income. If google (and yahoo) is unable to defend against these kinds of suits its the domain owner who will be hurt the most imho.

I hope this doesn't turn into a world wide class-action status.
nstalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 06:34 AM   · #5
dax44
NamePros Regular
 
Trader Rating: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 241
NP$: 150.00 (Donate)
dax44 is just really nicedax44 is just really nicedax44 is just really nicedax44 is just really nice
Google pulls out of domain parking

well maybe they are about to pull the plug ..

http://isitmeoriseveryoneelsestupid...es-approaching/

Will MFA adsense sites be next?

(thanks to Alex for the above link)
dax44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 07:40 AM   · #6
tres
You are here: X
 
tres's Avatar
 
Location: US
Trader Rating: (22)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 422
NP$: 59.75 (Donate)
tres is a jewel in the roughtres is a jewel in the roughtres is a jewel in the rough
I don't know how anyone could miss the fact that the ads run on affiliate websites. Even if they missed the opt-out, anyone paying attention would notice almost immediately which sources are / not converting.
__________________
tres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 12:27 PM   · #7
Ronald Regging
Ex-President
 
Ronald Regging's Avatar
 
Name: Herb
Location: Marietta, PA
Trader Rating: (30)
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,480
NP$: 5925.00 (Donate)
Ronald Regging has much to be proud ofRonald Regging has much to be proud ofRonald Regging has much to be proud ofRonald Regging has much to be proud ofRonald Regging has much to be proud ofRonald Regging has much to be proud ofRonald Regging has much to be proud ofRonald Regging has much to be proud of
Ethan Allen Fund
"Torrijos said the company took the position that clicks made by users who don't have a genuine interest in making a purchase are invalid."

Seriously, advertising has been around since the invention of trade. For thousands of years it's operated on a simple concept: You pay someone to address their audience in an attempt to sell your products or services. End of Story.

Now suddenly after all this time, people are trying to change the laws of advertising. I realize that the Internet is a relatively new and awesome medium, but does that mean we should just completely lose our heads?

The simple fact is that Google has a massive audience. If you want to reach that audience, than you pay them for ad space. Not everyone who clicks on your ad is going to make a purchase. Not everyone who views your television ad, hears your radio ad, sees your billboard, magazine, or newspaper ad is going to make a purchase either.

I think I'm going to open up a small shop and sue every person that comes into my store and doesn't make a purchase, because they're obviously perpetrating some kind of fraud.
Ronald Regging is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 02:13 PM   · #8
davenj
NamePros Member
 
Location: Jersey Shore
Trader Rating: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 25
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
davenj is an unknown quantity at this point
If someone takes the time to click on an ad they must have some "genuine interest" in at least getting more information on what the ad link is offering. If the offer is misleading or the product inadequate, that is a shortcoming of the advertiser, not the publisher.

Originally Posted by Ronald Regging
Not everyone who views your television ad, hears your radio ad, sees your billboard, magazine, or newspaper ad is going to make a purchase either.

I think I'm going to open up a small shop and sue every person that comes into my store and doesn't make a purchase, because they're obviously perpetrating some kind of fraud.


Perfectly stated.
davenj is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

NamePros is a revenue sharing forum.

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Site Sponsors
Click to Watch Instant Video http://www.mobisitetrader.com/ Click to Watch Instant Video
Advertise your business at NamePros
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0