| | |||||
| ||||||||
| Industry News Reporting and discussion of the latest news affecting the Internet industries. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | THREAD STARTER #1 (permalink) | ||||
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,187
![]() ![]() ![]() | Registrars threaten to sue over WLS A letter (pdf) was sent from an "ad hoc coalition of ICANN-accredited registrars" to ICANN today. http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl.../02/18/0245230
| ||||
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| NamePros Admin ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,919
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | [list=1][*]The letter argues that WLS violates the FTC act and consumer protection laws because it "deceptively" makes it sound as if subscribers have a good chance of getting the domain name they are paying to queue for. [*]It also says that WLS is anti-competitive. [*]It also accuses ICANN of failing to put competitive restrictions on VeriSign, which could engage in self-dealing. [*]The letter argues that the WLS is an illegal lottery. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/industry-news/20979-registrars-threaten-to-sue-over-wls.html [*]It argues that WLS "defrauds consumers" since it includes taking money for periods in which the domain is paid-up and hence can't become available. [/list=1] I applaud the registrars for giving it one last shot. Other than the third point, the legal arguments seem a little weak. We'll see how it goes!
__________________ Reach me at rj at namepros dot com |
| |