U.S. passes anti-Internet spam bill

RJ · 11-22-2003, 05:01 AM

Quote:

U.S. passes anti-Internet spam bill
Sat 22 November, 2003 12:09

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives has voted overwhelmingly for a bill to outlaw most Internet spam and create a "do not spam" registry for those who do not wish to receive unsolicited junk e-mail.

Online marketers who flood e-mail in boxes with pornography and get-rich-quick schemes would face multimillion dollar fines and jail time under the measure. It passed by a vote of 392-5 at dawn on Saturday, following an all-night session of the House that was largely devoted to a separate Medicare bill.

The Senate unanimously passed a similar anti-spam bill last month, but it must assent to the House changes before the measure can become law. The Senate is expected to do so in the coming days.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/industry-news/11385-u-s-passes-anti-internet-spam.html

Anti-spam bills have died in Congress for six years while unsolicited commercial e-mail has grown from a nuisance to a plague that threatens to derail the Internet's most popular means of communication.

Spam now makes up more than half of all e-mail, according to several surveys, and even online marketers have come to support some restrictions.

Lawmakers said spam has become a top constituent concern, and they also faced hundreds of unwanted messages daily.

Spam "cripples computer networks and makes regular e-mail checking a seemingly endless hassle," said House Energy and Commerce Chairman Billy Tauzin.

Lawmakers faced additional pressure to put a national law into place after California passed a tough anti-spam bill earlier this year. Online marketers say it would be difficult to comply with a patchwork of conflicting state laws.

The House bill, which would override state anti-spam laws, would allow businesses to send unsolicited e-mail to Internet users until they are asked to stop, an approach that some anti-spam activists say would only lead to more spam.

It would outlaw spammers' attempts to cover their tracks by requiring marketers to identify themselves clearly and avoid misleading subject lines or return addresses. Pornographic messages would have to be clearly labelled as such to allow users to more easily filter them out.

Violators would face millions of dollars in fines and up to five years in jail. The bill would not allow individuals to sue spammers.

The bill also authorises the Federal Trade Commission to set up a "Do Not Spam" registry of Internet users who wish to receive no unsolicited e-mail at all, similar to the Federal Trade Commission's popular "Do Not Call" list.

It also would outlaw cell-phone spam, which is commonplace in Europe and Asia. Under the provision, subscribers to cell phone services would not receive text message spam unless they have provided express authorisation.

America Online Inc. applauded the bill, saying it would help turn the tide against spam. "This law will be a significant weapon for the online industry in the ongoing fight to can the spam and thwart the spam kingpins," the company said in a statement.

Will this help anything?

dax · 11-22-2003, 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by -RJ-
Will this help anything?

I dont think so. Heard about open relays (servers with security holes that allow sending spam)?

That is why spam will not stop.

bensontwenty · 11-22-2003, 08:44 AM

This is more or less mirroring new European legislation whereby it is also an offence for any company in Europe to send unsolicited emal. They have taken it one step further now and every website based on a European server must have an opt-in clause on it instead of an opt-out which thus makes it harder to collect email addresses for mailing lists.

All I see happening is that the laws are making it harder and harder for legitimate web based businesses to operate whilst the spammers can simply move servers to countries outwith the legislation and remain untouchable.

Elefekt · 11-22-2003, 11:08 AM

I dont know if it will help at all but at least we know that they are trying.

Delete · 11-22-2003, 02:33 PM

yea that bill wont do much. Spam will always be around

11-22-2003, 11:08 AM	#4 (permalink)
Elefekt Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 3,529	I dont know if it will help at all but at least we know that they are trying. __________________ Standards Voice - Coming soon...

11-22-2003, 08:44 AM	#3 (permalink)
bensontwenty Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Scotland Posts: 1,085	This is more or less mirroring new European legislation whereby it is also an offence for any company in Europe to send unsolicited emal. They have taken it one step further now and every website based on a European server must have an opt-in clause on it instead of an opt-out which thus makes it harder to collect email addresses for mailing lists. All I see happening is that the laws are making it harder and harder for legitimate web based businesses to operate whilst the spammers can simply move servers to countries outwith the legislation and remain untouchable.

11-22-2003, 02:33 PM	#5 (permalink)
Delete Account Suspended Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,104	yea that bill wont do much. Spam will always be around

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)