krx

I own a few geo + channel dot TVs. From what I gather, the majority here see these type of names, in general (depending of course on the particular geo), as having value ~ and growing in value over time. I'm wondering now about the relative value of the same names in dot com. For example, how would you value <bigcity>channel.com relative to <bigcity>channel.tv? Also, would both together be worth more than the sum of the parts?

hullswingerscom

what about channelbigcity.com
or just http://www.channelm.co.uk/
you can go on for ever with this combo

__________________
www.transport.tv

krx

Not really sure what you mean. Channelbigcity just doesn't work IMHO. The geo name needs to come first just to sound right...
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/dot-tv/505034-another-geo-plus-channel-question.html

Any case, I'm picking up on the ongoing discussion about the relative value of city + channel TV names (compared for example to city + state) and asking about the relative value of 'geochannel' TVs vs. 'geochannel' COMs ~ e.g., memphis{+}channel{dot}TV vs. memphis{+}channel{dot}COM.

Channel doesn't fit the dot com ext as well but then dot com is the more valuable ext, typically speaking. Do these pros and cons balance out and make the domains = in value?

hullswingerscom

i have sold a channelbigcity.comfor good price this year .
so it does work for some.

but i like bigcitychannel.com...best of all

http://www.channelislandsdirect.co.uk/
channel geo works very well!

__________________
www.transport.tv

krx

Very cool. Congrats!

Any idea what the buyer will do with it?