Many here will still say reg fee here because they do not have any concept of the visualizations necessary for .tv.
It's not their fault, they just haven't adjusted to the fact that .tv IS NOT the .com they are attributing their formula to. Although I do not see a great amount of $$$ here, I do not see reg fee, either.
There is marketing to a certain demographic necessary here, which they haven't included in their determination either, again not their fault.
Good luck, hard work. develop, market and roll the dice.
I also got reg fee for www.dogtags.tv on some other forum, as if I cared.
Last edited by freedom30 : 05-20-2007 at 05:45 PM.
Reason: add site
I totally agree with you on that. When I buy a .tv name I visualise a tv channel to go with the name. I always have a concept in mind and hopefully someone else will have the same concept and want to purchase it.
agree-I think an end user--will see the most value to whatever name. With hd-dvd and blu-ray drives coming to computers and HD Camcorders--HD is going to be huge in the near future. Despite the guys thinking ref fee lol, IMHO this will be a value name, based on HD is the future of video.
Respect all opinions nevertheless---people in early days never thought the internet will be what it is--theres Always resistance in the beginning.
If moviechannel is 3K yr-what should hdmoviechannel.tv be? 
