| | |||||
| ||||||||
| Dot MOBI Discussion of the .MOBI TLD |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | THREAD STARTER #3 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Sunnyvale Trailer Park
Posts: 1,122
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Thanks for the reply Jagusa Just wondering, what would be considered not too long. Where do you draw the line? One word? Two short words? Would love to hear some opinions on this! |
| |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,271
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | I consider domains with stems beyond 11-14 letters as long, and it's a fairly short trip from there to awful. Conversely, I'd consider six letters or less as short. There are probably curves showing the domain names length distributions somewhere. Two words are fine when they go together. Three words gets into questionable territory unless it's a very familiar phrase (like, "ILoveYou"). Long names can still be valuable. Dnjournal shows some quite long names going for Xxxxxx ---> enterprisemobile.com. Valuable, but I consider longer names as riskier ventures. For .mobi, I think short will be exponentially more desirable.
__________________ m8p.com is currently at auction on Sedo, ending tonight (Feb 9) at 11:22PM Los Angeles time. |
| |
| | THREAD STARTER #5 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Sunnyvale Trailer Park
Posts: 1,122
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | origionally, I agreed. My first .mobi reg was OnFly.mobi. Kind of thought it would be a good portal for things on the fly. But with bookmarks, I believe that relevancy will rule in the long run. But only if it makes "mobi sense" |
| |