NamePros
Welcome, Guest! Ready to make a name for yourself in the domain business? We welcome both the hobbyist and professional domainer to join the discussion as part of the NamePros community.

Click here to create your profile to start earning reputation for posting, and trader ratings for buying & selling in our free e-marketplace. Build your trader rating with each successful sale. Our system has tracked over 100,000 sales and counting!
FAQ & TOS Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   NamePros.com > Domain Name Discussion Forums > Domain Names > Domain Name Discussion
Reload this Page Domains in a Roth IRA?

Domain Name Discussion The place for general domain name related discussions.

Advanced Search


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-01-2009, 03:36 PM THREAD STARTER               #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,295
accent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond repute
 



Domains in a Roth IRA?


Roth IRAs shield profit from investments from taxes, permanently, so it would seem the best plan would be to place those investments with the greatest potential in a Roth. That would (hopefully) be domains. I am surprised that there appear to be no threads on NP discussing placing domains in a Roth IRA. My quick research looks like it would be possible to set up a corporation within the IRA and buy, sell and develop domains tax exempt.

People outside the USA are no doubt mystified at what I am talking about - I doubt any of this applies to you.

Has anyone looked into setting up a domain Roth IRA?
accent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 03:39 PM   #2 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
zoogo's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Stillness
Posts: 536
zoogo is a jewel in the roughzoogo is a jewel in the roughzoogo is a jewel in the rough
 



s there a similar thing in Canada?
__________________
Good luck!
zoogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 08:06 PM   #3 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 255
jacques is just really nicejacques is just really nicejacques is just really nicejacques is just really nice
 



Roth IRA: I have been dealing in this area for many years and the "type" of investment in a Roth IRA is surprisingly flexible. If the legal structure of the Roth is solid, I see no reason whatsoever that a domain portfolio could not qualify as eligible for a Roth plan.

Note: My opinion only- consult a financial professional.
jacques is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 09:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
First Time Poster!
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
TaxDoc is an unknown quantity at this point
 



IRA Investments


Hi,

I'm a tax attorney/CPA and a retirement plan specialist. To cut to the chase, there is no legal problem (i.e. tax law problem) in doing what you are suggesting. However, it has to be done in the right way, and a C Corporation would be the best entity to own the domains and then the shares of the Corp. would be owned by the IRA.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/domain-name-discussion/593716-domains-in-a-roth-ira.html

Historically there has always been one big impediment to such nontraditional investments: finding an IRA trustee to handle investments in closely held corporation. Traditional trustees like banks won't do it because your not buying their products.

However, there are a handful of IRA trustees in the US who will do these kinds of investments (including real estate) and who will make sure all the technical tax rules are followed.

Can't give you any names off the top but if you'd like to PM me I could give you some information.

Leo Vidal
Millersville, MD CPA / The Tax Doctor

PS - I've not mentioned the word "Roth" because it doesn't matter what type of IRA it is; the investment rules are the same.
TaxDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 09:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
dnpimping.com's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 451
dnpimping.com has a spectacular aura aboutdnpimping.com has a spectacular aura about
 



Originally Posted by TaxDoc View Post
Hi,

I'm a tax attorney/CPA and a retirement plan specialist. To cut to the chase, there is no legal problem (i.e. tax law problem) in doing what you are suggesting. However, it has to be done in the right way, and a C Corporation would be the best entity to own the domains and then the shares of the Corp. would be owned by the IRA.

Historically there has always been one big impediment to such nontraditional investments: finding an IRA trustee to handle investments in closely held corporation. Traditional trustees like banks won't do it because your not buying their products.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=593716

However, there are a handful of IRA trustees in the US who will do these kinds of investments (including real estate) and who will make sure all the technical tax rules are followed.

Can't give you any names off the top but if you'd like to PM me I could give you some information.

Leo Vidal
Millersville, MD CPA / The Tax Doctor

PS - I've not mentioned the word "Roth" because it doesn't matter what type of IRA it is; the investment rules are the same.
Thanks for that information doc, definitely sounds like a great way to protect profits.
__________________

dnpimping.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 11:00 PM THREAD STARTER               #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,295
accent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond repute
 



Thanks, this looks like a really interesting idea. The potential profits from domains are off the charts, the initial investment is not very large. I favor Roth because, while the initial costs are from after tax funds, the profits are never taxable, unless you withdraw them before retirement.

Is it true that you would have to fill the account with new purchases - domains already owned are not eligible?

What is involved in setting this up, beyond finding a trustee (costs, rules, restrictions, pitfalls)?

Here is a business idea for a clever CPA - set up IRAs for domainers.
accent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 02:55 AM   #7 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
zoogo's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Stillness
Posts: 536
zoogo is a jewel in the roughzoogo is a jewel in the roughzoogo is a jewel in the rough
 



Originally Posted by accentnepal View Post
Thanks, this looks like a really interesting idea. The potential profits from domains are off the charts, the initial investment is not very large. I favor Roth because, while the initial costs are from after tax funds, the profits are never taxable, unless you withdraw them before retirement.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=593716

Is it true that you would have to fill the account with new purchases - domains already owned are not eligible?

What is involved in setting this up, beyond finding a trustee (costs, rules, restrictions, pitfalls)?

Here is a business idea for a clever CPA - set up IRAs for domainers.
What qualifies as "Retirement" ?
__________________
Good luck!
zoogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
acc
NamePros Regular
 
acc's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 792
acc has much to be proud ofacc has much to be proud ofacc has much to be proud ofacc has much to be proud ofacc has much to be proud ofacc has much to be proud ofacc has much to be proud ofacc has much to be proud ofacc has much to be proud of
 


Special Olympics
Originally Posted by TaxDoc View Post
Hi,
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=593716

I'm a tax attorney/CPA and a retirement plan specialist. To cut to the chase, there is no legal problem (i.e. tax law problem) in doing what you are suggesting. However, it has to be done in the right way, and a C Corporation would be the best entity to own the domains and then the shares of the Corp. would be owned by the IRA.

Historically there has always been one big impediment to such nontraditional investments: finding an IRA trustee to handle investments in closely held corporation. Traditional trustees like banks won't do it because your not buying their products.

However, there are a handful of IRA trustees in the US who will do these kinds of investments (including real estate) and who will make sure all the technical tax rules are followed.

Can't give you any names off the top but if you'd like to PM me I could give you some information.

Leo Vidal
Millersville, MD CPA / The Tax Doctor

PS - I've not mentioned the word "Roth" because it doesn't matter what type of IRA it is; the investment rules are the same.
Nice to have you here to give us your professional opinion. The point about needing an IRA trustee is very helpful to this discussion.

Is it possible to use an S Corp too? Does a C corp have better standing in this regard than as S corp?
Can there be any other investments held by the corp too or would it be best to have it dedicated to just domain names?

Thank you very much.
.
__________________
.
acc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 12:22 AM THREAD STARTER               #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,295
accent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond repute
 



Saw "Self Directed IRA" on a Google ad on this page (Google is getting better at "understanding", they formerly would have ads for home canning supplies and fleece jackets), so I looked it up:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
..... In an effort to reduce fees, paperwork, and processing delays, some self-directed IRA investors choose to employ an IRA LLC structure. In such a structure the accountholder directs his IRA custodian to invest into a limited liability company that he manages himself. The accountholder can then execute transactions on the LLC level without the involvement of the IRA custodian, thus reducing fees and eliminating custodian transactional fees and delays. The profits of the LLC pass through to the IRA with nearly identical tax favorable treatment. This IRA LLC strategy has been legitimized through a tax court case: Swanson v. Commissioner, 106 T.C. 76 (1996). Some refer to this structure as "checkbook control" because the IRA accountholder often has sole signing authority for the LLC and its bank accounts. Similar checkbook control for a self-directed 401(k) plan would not require an LLC because Internal Revenue Code Section 401 does not mandate the use of a custodian. .....
The retirement age is 59 1/2 - withdrawals before then incur a 10% penalty.
accent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 03:06 PM   #10 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
tricolorro's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bronx.NY
Posts: 978
tricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant future
 



Originally Posted by TaxDoc View Post
Hi,

I'm a tax attorney/CPA and a retirement plan specialist. To cut to the chase, there is no legal problem (i.e. tax law problem) in doing what you are suggesting. However, it has to be done in the right way, and a C Corporation would be the best entity to own the domains and then the shares of the Corp. would be owned by the IRA.

Historically there has always been one big impediment to such nontraditional investments: finding an IRA trustee to handle investments in closely held corporation. Traditional trustees like banks won't do it because your not buying their products.

However, there are a handful of IRA trustees in the US who will do these kinds of investments (including real estate) and who will make sure all the technical tax rules are followed.

Can't give you any names off the top but if you'd like to PM me I could give you some information.

Leo Vidal
Millersville, MD CPA / The Tax Doctor

PS - I've not mentioned the word "Roth" because it doesn't matter what type of IRA it is; the investment rules are the same.
Mr.Vidal,

You are talking about Self-Directed IRAs.

And it certainly makes a BIG difference if you choose a Roth IRA or Regular IRA
for your retirement investment.

A BIG difference.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=593716

I'm sure you know a regular IRA is funded with pre-tax dollars and then you are taxed
when you start withdrawing your $.

Roth IRAs do not use pre-tax dollars and you are NOT taxed when you
withdraw your $.

Regular IRA- pay taxes

Roth IRA- tax free

Any $ earned in a Roth IRA is tax free forever. Not so with a Regular IRA.

To me that it certainly does matter which form of IRA you choose
for your retirement investment strategy.
Last edited by tricolorro; 07-03-2009 at 03:11 PM. Reason: correction
tricolorro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 08:55 PM   #11 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
blaknite's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake
Posts: 454
blaknite is a splendid one to beholdblaknite is a splendid one to beholdblaknite is a splendid one to beholdblaknite is a splendid one to beholdblaknite is a splendid one to beholdblaknite is a splendid one to beholdblaknite is a splendid one to behold
 



Originally Posted by nudu View Post
What qualifies as "Retirement" ?
Aside from the standard 59 and 1/2 retirement age I've heard of one other retirement option. I'm not sure if it applies to roth IRA's, but you can retire at any age provided you cash out using "substantially equal payments" leading up to retirement age. In other words if you cashed out at 40 you couldn't take the full balance. You would have to take it in twenty payments once a year or 240 payments once a month.
blaknite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 10:43 PM THREAD STARTER               #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,295
accent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond repute
 



Is there anybody here that actually has an IRA with domains in it?

Anybody that has a self-directed IRA of any kind?
accent is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
408a.com - ROTH IRA Phronesis Domain Appraisals 2 06-26-2006 04:51 PM
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Domains for Sale. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ CureCancer Domains For Sale - Fixed Price 0 03-06-2006 09:38 AM
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Domains for Sale. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ CureCancer Domains For Sale - Fixed Price 0 03-05-2006 02:26 PM
WHOLESALE List of Sports & Fitness Domains Duke Domains For Sale - Make Offer 4 09-03-2003 12:58 PM
35 Wholesale Travel & Vacation Domains Duke Domains For Sale - Make Offer 2 09-01-2003 03:23 PM

Liquid Web Smart Servers  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Managed Web Hosting by Liquid Web
Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com Powered by: vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 Ad Management plugin by RedTyger