NamePros
Welcome, Guest! Ready to make a name for yourself in the domain business? We welcome both the hobbyist and professional domainer to join the discussion as part of the NamePros community.

Click here to create your profile to start earning reputation for posting, and trader ratings for buying & selling in our free e-marketplace. Build your trader rating with each successful sale. Our system has tracked over 100,000 sales and counting!
FAQ & TOS Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   NamePros.com > Domain Name Discussion Forums > Domain Names > Domain Name Discussion
Reload this Page No more 60 day Lock after whois change!

Domain Name Discussion The place for general domain name related discussions.

Advanced Search


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-04-2008, 05:04 AM THREAD STARTER               #1 (permalink)
Yofie.com
 
Yofie's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DotWeekly.com
Posts: 2,935
Yofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond repute
 

Member of the Month
August 2008
Save The Children Save The Children

No more 60 day Lock after whois change!


I like this and I do not. I think if a domain is transfered to a New Owner, the domain should be locked for security reasons. Again, this brings up another issue since any domain name owner can put whatever they want for whois info, so ICANN may not even notice a change of ownership, making tracking that very hard.

From ICANN:

A registrant change to Whois information is not a valid basis for denying a transfer request.

This section of the advisory considers the scenario when a registrar requires a registrant to provide consent to deny transfer requests for a certain period of time (usually 60 days) in order for the registrant to update its Whois data.

Section A.3 of the Transfer Policy enumerates nine independent bases that a registrar may rely on to deny a domain name transfer request. Registrant updates to Whois contact details is not enumerated as a valid basis to deny a transfer request in the Transfer Policy. In addition, ordinary changes to Whois data fields are not evidence of fraud and therefore not a basis to deny a domain name transfer request.

Pursuant to Section A.3 of the Transfer Policy, registrars are permitted to deny transfer requests if they have obtained, "6. Express written objection to the transfer from the Transfer contact. (e.g. - email, fax, paper document or other processes by which the Transfer Contact has expressly and voluntarily objected through opt-in means)". While the language in parenthesis is provided as an example in paragraph enumerated 6 of Section A.3 of the Transfer Policy, this language is instructive regarding what types of express written objections were envisioned as acceptable as a basis to deny a transfer request – only those objections that are provided expressly and voluntarily.

Subsection 3.7.7.1 of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement ("RAA") requires registrars to include language in their registration agreements that obligates registrants to maintain "accurate and reliable contact details and promptly correct and update them during the term of the…registration." By agreeing to such language, registrants are under a strict requirement to update their Whois contact details when they change. Subsection 3.7.7.2 of the RAA requires registrars to include language in their registration agreements that authorizes them to cancel domain name registrations for any willful breach of these obligations. Accordingly, failure by a registrant to timely update Whois contact details may result in the cancellation of a domain name.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/domain-name-discussion/453375-no-more-60-day-lock-after.html

Registrars that have implemented processes that require registrants to consent to deny transfer requests in order to update Whois contact information are not obtaining voluntary express objections and therefore such objections cannot be used as a basis for denying a transfer pursuant to Section A.3 of the Transfer Policy.

Registrars are advised that any express written objections to transfer obtained by registrars through compulsory means, including express written objections obtained before allowing registrants to make required Whois data changes, are involuntary and therefore not a valid basis to deny transfer requests.
__________________
DotWeekly.com <--My Blog, Readers Welcome!
Yofie is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:36 AM   #2 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 883
staffjam is a jewel in the roughstaffjam is a jewel in the roughstaffjam is a jewel in the rough
 



It's very interesting - when did this come out?
Will the registrars take any notice of it though?
I'd certainly find it useful as the 60 day holding period is a pain in the ass.
__________________
Buy Domain Names – 9i.com, 3J.com, ZB.org, Foob.com, Wodo.com, Sixth.com – These are just a few of the great names on offer at namecake.com (Click below)
Buy Domain Names
Solar Garden Lights Virtual Reality Games
staffjam is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:43 AM THREAD STARTER               #3 (permalink)
Yofie.com
 
Yofie's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DotWeekly.com
Posts: 2,935
Yofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond repute
 

Member of the Month
August 2008
Save The Children Save The Children
Originally Posted by staffjam
It's very interesting - when did this come out?
Will the registrars take any notice of it though?
I'd certainly find it useful as the 60 day holding period is a pain in the ass.
This was released as of yesterday.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=453375

If a registrar is not allowing you to transfer out, point out the ICANN section A.3 if they still deny it, Report Them!http://icann.org/general/contact.htm
__________________
DotWeekly.com <--My Blog, Readers Welcome!
Yofie is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:54 AM   #4 (permalink)
NamePros Member
 
Sully's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: East Coast
Posts: 187
Sully will become famous soon enoughSully will become famous soon enough
 



Thanks a ton...this is very useful info.
Sully is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 07:12 AM   #5 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
pixelpadre's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eustis Florida
Posts: 78
pixelpadre is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Originally Posted by Yofie
.................................................. ..........................................obtainin g voluntary express objections and therefore such objections cannot be used as a basis for denying a transfer pursuant to Section A.3 of the Transfer Policy. [/B]

Registrars are advised that any express written objections to transfer obtained by registrars through compulsory means, including express written objections obtained before allowing registrants to make required Whois data changes, are involuntary and therefore not a valid basis to deny transfer requests.
Could someone translate this into english for me?
pixelpadre is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 07:37 AM   #6 (permalink)
NamePros Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 123
gawnd will become famous soon enoughgawnd will become famous soon enough
 



Very good news. I appreciate you sharing this.
__________________
2011 Calendar Business Inkjets Cheap Printer Ink Cartridges E-cyle used Printer Ink & Toner
Avoid Foreclosure Home Mortgage Foreclosures - Free Foreclosure Listings, Preforeclosure Listings & Foreclosure Investment Forum
gawnd is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 08:08 AM   #7 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 883
staffjam is a jewel in the roughstaffjam is a jewel in the roughstaffjam is a jewel in the rough
 



Thanks Yofie - given you a bit of Rep.
__________________
Buy Domain Names – 9i.com, 3J.com, ZB.org, Foob.com, Wodo.com, Sixth.com – These are just a few of the great names on offer at namecake.com (Click below)
Buy Domain Names
Solar Garden Lights Virtual Reality Games
staffjam is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 08:40 AM   #8 (permalink)
lzy
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,118
lzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant futurelzy has a brilliant future
 


Protect Our Planet Save a Life Child Abuse
Let's see how GD reacts to this...
__________________
...
lzy is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 09:15 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,295
accent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond reputeaccent has a reputation beyond repute
 



Yeah, as far as I know, Godaddy is the only registrar that requires you to agree to a 60 day lock on transfers if you want to change whois information. Many people thought that it was just an excuse to keep you at Godaddy.

Bad Godaddy got wrist slapped.

Actually what is notable is that ICANN actually moved against the policies of their biggest registrar.

Could Verisign be the next to feel ICANN's new found courage???
Naw, I'm dreaming.
accent is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 09:18 AM   #10 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
Pred's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,713
Pred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond reputePred has a reputation beyond repute
 


Animal Cruelty AIDS/HIV Animal Rescue Protect Our Planet
Originally Posted by lzy
Let's see how GD reacts to this...
simple, if we all keep reporting them via Yofie's link then they will keep getting reprimanded.
Originally Posted by Yofie
This was released as of yesterday.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=453375

If a registrar is not allowing you to transfer out, point out the ICANN section A.3 if they still deny it, Report Them!http://icann.org/general/contact.htm
even they will learn their lesson, like Netsol did.

has icann finally sprouted a pair of balls? has there been a recent change of leadership?
Pred is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 11:35 AM THREAD STARTER               #11 (permalink)
Yofie.com
 
Yofie's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DotWeekly.com
Posts: 2,935
Yofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond repute
 

Member of the Month
August 2008
Save The Children Save The Children
Originally Posted by accentnepal
Yeah, as far as I know, Godaddy is the only registrar that requires you to agree to a 60 day lock on transfers if you want to change whois information. Many people thought that it was just an excuse to keep you at Godaddy.
Network Solutions does it as well. I currently have all my domains Under Lock because I updated to a new email address... Time to
__________________
DotWeekly.com <--My Blog, Readers Welcome!
Yofie is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:16 PM   #12 (permalink)
Electrifying Guy
 
Dave Zan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,749
Dave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond repute
 




Link to what Yofie described:

http://icann.org/announcements/advisory-03apr08.htm

Go Daddy and Network Solutions will no doubt seek to clarify at least. After all
that, it's anyone's guess.
__________________
Vidi, Vici, Veni!
Follow My Tweets | Check My Blog
Dave Zan is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:28 PM THREAD STARTER               #13 (permalink)
Yofie.com
 
Yofie's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DotWeekly.com
Posts: 2,935
Yofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond reputeYofie has a reputation beyond repute
 

Member of the Month
August 2008
Save The Children Save The Children
A bit off topic... In the email that I get notification that there was a reply to this post, it says in the email.... Web Design Talk Forums in the "From" in email? That use to say NamePros.com forum or something like that????
__________________
DotWeekly.com <--My Blog, Readers Welcome!
Yofie is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:31 PM   #14 (permalink)
Electrifying Guy
 
Dave Zan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,749
Dave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond reputeDave Zan has a reputation beyond repute
 




Originally Posted by Yofie
A bit off topic... In the email that I get notification that there was a reply to this post, it says in the email.... Web Design Talk Forums in the "From" in email? That use to say NamePros.com forum or something like that????
They're the same. I type in WebDesignTalk in case I'm not able to access NP
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=453375
like right now.
__________________
Vidi, Vici, Veni!
Follow My Tweets | Check My Blog
Dave Zan is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 07:52 PM   #15 (permalink)
NamePros Regular
 
tricolorro's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bronx.NY
Posts: 978
tricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant futuretricolorro has a brilliant future
 



Originally Posted by Yofie
I like this and I do not. I think if a domain is transfered to a New Owner, the domain should be locked for security reasons
Hi Yofie,

I believe you are misinterpreting this new rule.

If you change YOUR WhoIs info, the Registrar cannot lock your domain
for doing so.

If you transfer the domain to someone else, they are the new Registrant
and the 60 day lock will apply.

Changing the WhoIs on a domain when it's yours and changing the
Who Is on a domain to reflect new ownership is not the same thing.

This policy change mostly has to do with GoDaddy's slimy policy of forcing you to agree to a 60 day lock simply because you updated or changed certain WhoIs info.

See below.


Originally Posted by Yofie
A registrant change to Whois information is not a valid basis for denying a transfer request.
Andrew Allemann of Domain Name Wire had brought GoDaddy's very questionable policy to Vint Cerf's attention in 2005 when Mr. Cerf was Chairman of ICANN's Board Of Directors:

"But the practice (GodDaddy's) may come to an end thanks to an ICANN advisory. I actually mentioned this problem to Vint Cerf, Chair of ICANN’s Board of Directors, at a Domain Roundtable conference two years ago. He was surprised to hear about GoDaddy’s policy."
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=453375

source:
http://snurl.com/godaddytransfer2

Andrew also wrote about this in April 2006:
"Is GoDaddy violating ICANN’s transfer policy?"

http://snurl.com/GoDaddyTransfers

Patrick
Last edited by tricolorro; 04-04-2008 at 07:57 PM. Reason: correction
tricolorro is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 11:39 AM   #16 (permalink)
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 13
Goodwill is an unknown quantity at this point
 



I too had such odd experiences,when I updated only my contact no. !
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=453375
It worked quickly nearer to expiration date !
Originally Posted by Yofie
Network Solutions does it as well. I currently have all my domains Under Lock because I updated to a new email address... Time to
Goodwill is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Liquid Web Smart Servers  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:28 PM.

Managed Web Hosting by Liquid Web
Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com Powered by: vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 Ad Management plugin by RedTyger