| | |||||
| ||||||||
| Domain Name Discussion The place for general domain name related discussions. |
![]() | LeadRefs | Forum Sponsorship |
| Want to sell your domain? LeadRefs.com finds multiple potential buyers to contact instantly! | ||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | THREAD STARTER #1 (permalink) |
| Electrifying Guy ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,827
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | How far should a registrar or reseller step in? A thought occurred to me and I thought I'd discuss it as a new thread. Some of you know that GD has a strong anti-spam stance. Based on the stories I gave in my last post in another thread, apparently they'd shut down a domain name upon receipt of a spam complaint. To be fair, however, they'd first attempt to notify the domain name owner about the spam complaint and have that owner respond accordingly with an explanation and proof, if possible. One internet marketer I know (and perhaps some of you do) experienced this. I'm not sure but I think GD told her who complained, she researched her files, and found the complainant as a confirmed opt-in of her mailing list. The complainant apparently received one of her emailed newsletters, forgot that she/he actually opted in & confirmed, & complained it to GD. Thankfully GD didn't just shut it down just like that. But the experience was enough for the IM to decide to eventually transfer the domain elsewhere. All of us (except the real naive newbies and spammers) hate spam like the plague. But I'm left to wonder how far should registrars or resellers butt in on a domain name's activities. For example, NSI will shut down a domain name and its services if they discover, one way or another (via spam complaint especially) that the domain name ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/domain-name-discussion/45024-how-far-should-registrar-reseller-step.html owner is using their email servers for spamming. But if they receive complaints from people about a domain name being involved in spamming using either a different hosting provider or their own servers, they respectfully but firmly say they don't "police" the internet and would tell them to take it up w/ the proper authorities. Another thing NSI doesn't butt in is if they receive complaints from people about a domain name involved in, say, an MLM or pyramiding scheme & would also tell them to report those cases to the police instead. There's another registrar who also adopts this stance, though I forgot that name. Another time they'd step in, of course, is if the domain name is the subject of a legal dispute (i.e. trademark, ownership dispute between 2 persons, etc.). So guys, in your honest opinions, how far do you think a registrar or reseller should step in? |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Internet Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,855
![]() ![]() | Registrars manages domains, they shouldnt do anything else that the owner or the law say about a domain. Hosts, comapnies that host domain do have other things to look for. If they know that there is a site on their network that are breaking the law they should take it away. But they shouldnt do that before there are some real evidence, and that you allmost allways only can get from the police and law orgs. |
| |
| | #5 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Admin ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,919
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | First, I HATE spam. It's the #1 problem on the Internet today. That being said, I do not like that registrars are jumping in to be spam police, taking spam complaints and shutting down domains.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=45024 Web hosts and upstream providers have already appointed themselves judge and jury over spam complaints. You can find hundreds of stories from webmasters that have had their websites yanked because of false or poorly investigated spam complaints where the hosts have overreacted. We don't need registrars also taking this position.
__________________ Reach me at rj at namepros dot com | ||||
| |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,985
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | I would agree, spam is a huge issue now. I receive MANY spam emails a day, and as RJ said, it is becoming a standard, as most of the emails I receive are just return emails saying the receipient didn't receive the email because my email was used as the return address. My question is, how exactly can this be controlled? |
| |
| | THREAD STARTER #7 (permalink) | ||||
| Electrifying Guy ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,827
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
stop buying from spam. There is one solution being worked on, w/ Microsoft taking the lead. You can read it here: http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/..._senderid.mspx | ||||
| |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| NamePros Expert Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: NYC
Posts: 9,132
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Domain registrars probably get involved with this sort of thing because they are worried about legal action being taken against them. That being said, maybe ICANN should put a system in place to take care of this, like a WIPO for spam... |
| |
| | THREAD STARTER #9 (permalink) | ||||
| Electrifying Guy ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,827
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=45024 I believe you've heard of it, the CAN-Spam Act? For all its bungling provisions, it's still a start. But I won't be surprised if ICANN's already working on such but is keeping it under wraps for the meantime until it's 100% sure of its position...
Last edited by Dave Zan; 08-27-2004 at 06:40 AM.
| ||||
| |
| | #10 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 633
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hmmm... not sure I would say microsoft is taking the lead, so much as they are on the bandwagon, and trying to appear they are taking the lead, with their markering again. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=45024 I notice they want you to agree to a licence if you use their info to impliement it also. I would suggest learning about it here : http://www.spf.pobox.com/ they are the true orginators of it, and you stay free of licensing issues.
__________________ Need a break? Check out TheDamnBlog.com Free $6.95 directi accounts at Directi Name Bin Instant free $8.95 eNom accounts at Dncube.com | ||||
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Hi :) Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: NC
Posts: 9,537
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Ditto on all above ~ How many times a day do You guys get "returned mail errors" that you didn't send to begin with !!! ~ I forward ALL email being sent to most all of my domains to one address .... It really freaks me out sometimes how many "errors" and "threats" you can get in a day or two because someone else is using your Addresses
__________________ When the man at the door yelled "Alcohol , Tobacco , and Firearms" .... I just assumed it was a delivery ! |
| |
| | THREAD STARTER #12 (permalink) | ||||
| Electrifying Guy ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,827
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| ||||
| |
| | #13 (permalink) | ||||
| Ultima Ratio Regum Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Up North
Posts: 2,080
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=45024 Some sh*thead used one of my domain names for spoofing, and was kind enough to include a real e-mail address i had on that domain on his spam list as well..
__________________ IP Whois + Geolocation|Geolocate your IP|Dynamic Forum Sigs <meta name="Jedi Mind Trick" content="Buy my domains, you will!"> | ||||
| |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |