someone already regged sex.kids.us, drugs, and others,

domdom · 09-09-2003, 11:49 AM

i thought it had to go through a review process?

did this guy just waste his money?
but im also surprised why the .kids registry didnt block some of these types of names,

in france .fr all generic 1 word names cannot be registred.

????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/cctld-discussion/6246-someone-already-regged-sex-kids-us.html

i also saw this

toys.kids.us
Created by Registrar: ENCIRCA, INC
Domain Registration Date: Fri Aug 29 05:27:32 GMT 2003
Domain Expiration Date: Thu Aug 28 23:59:59 GMT 2008

according to the site Go Live" Process: September 4, 2003 (live registrations, DNS, WHOIS)
i think you cant trademark a generic name ? or would be difficult, anyway this guy go the name a few days before anyone else could do it. how ??

DSL · 09-09-2003, 05:04 PM

Thats sick. I dont know who would do that.

dot · 09-09-2003, 05:17 PM

sex education perhaps

DuffMan · 09-09-2003, 06:38 PM

The content on all .kids.us sites have to be reviewied, not the names. Unless the sites are about things like abstinence and drug abuse prevention, they won't be approved and won't be allowed to launch.

Jeffrey · 09-09-2003, 06:40 PM

Or maybe he just bought it ahead so it could not land on the pedophiles' hands.

Webtwink · 09-09-2003, 07:36 PM

well he himself could be in Big trouble. the guy is sick and will land in jail.

Jeff · 09-09-2003, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dot
sex education perhaps

Quote:

Originally posted by DuffMan
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=6246
The content on all .kids.us sites have to be reviewied, not the names. Unless the sites are about things like abstinence and drug abuse prevention, they won't be approved and won't be allowed to launch.

Correct, as I, too, have read it to understand.

Quote:

Originally posted by -RJ-
The new namespace kids.us, created as a safe spot for kids, is now open for registrations.

List of Kids.Us registrars
http://www.kids.us/buy.html

All sites must are subject to review and a $250 review fee before going live. Sites may not link to other sites that are outside of .kids.us

doubledee999 · 09-10-2003, 06:08 AM

Maybe the name is reserved by the registry

domdom · 09-10-2003, 06:49 AM

ah not its not reserved,

i checked whois , is some company in asutralia,

drugs belongs to a new zealand 'e property' group
maybe they thinkinbg will be worth soething

i was thinking more about the name. sex.kids.us is not actually so bad if used correctly, most days after age 9 or 10 you get sex education in all government schools, maybe it is a site about the birds and bees, and dangers of aids, then would be quite beneficial.

but obvious names like sluts, and other degrading words would be worse.

aliepayne · 09-10-2003, 07:45 AM

I agree.

'Sex education' brings up 27,504 on Overture. It could be a very worth while site.

-Alex

09-09-2003, 11:49 AM	THREAD STARTER #1 (permalink)
domdom NamePros Regular Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 206	someone already regged sex.kids.us, drugs, and others, i thought it had to go through a review process? did this guy just waste his money? but im also surprised why the .kids registry didnt block some of these types of names, in france .fr all generic 1 word names cannot be registred. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/cctld-discussion/6246-someone-already-regged-sex-kids-us.html i also saw this toys.kids.us Created by Registrar: ENCIRCA, INC Domain Registration Date: Fri Aug 29 05:27:32 GMT 2003 Domain Expiration Date: Thu Aug 28 23:59:59 GMT 2008 according to the site Go Live" Process: September 4, 2003 (live registrations, DNS, WHOIS) i think you cant trademark a generic name ? or would be difficult, anyway this guy go the name a few days before anyone else could do it. how ?? Last edited by domdom; 09-09-2003 at 12:07 PM.

09-09-2003, 05:17 PM	#3 (permalink)
dot NamePros Regular Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 411	sex education perhaps __________________ .

09-09-2003, 06:38 PM	#4 (permalink)
DuffMan NamePros Regular Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Maryland, USA Posts: 603	The content on all .kids.us sites have to be reviewied, not the names. Unless the sites are about things like abstinence and drug abuse prevention, they won't be approved and won't be allowed to launch. __________________ Eric AKA DuffMan [HG Interactive] [ ShoutPro]

09-09-2003, 06:40 PM	#5 (permalink)
Jeffrey Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Cebu Posts: 1,431	Or maybe he just bought it ahead so it could not land on the pedophiles' hands. __________________ Professionally Designed VECTOR ICONS! \|Search 1 gigabyte mails here! \| Personal Blog \| Soccer Blog \| Manila Blog \| Blog Directory \| JQR.org - taking offers \| Free Cebu City Photos

09-10-2003, 07:45 AM	#10 (permalink)
aliepayne NamePros Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 129	I agree. 'Sex education' brings up 27,504 on Overture. It could be a very worth while site. -Alex __________________ http://www.afternic.com/names.php?u=6944

09-09-2003, 05:04 PM	#2 (permalink)
DSL Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 2,115	Thats sick. I dont know who would do that.

09-09-2003, 07:36 PM	#6 (permalink)
Webtwink Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: United States of America Posts: 1,158	well he himself could be in Big trouble. the guy is sick and will land in jail.

09-10-2003, 06:08 AM	#8 (permalink)
doubledee999 NamePros Regular Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Boston Posts: 818	Maybe the name is reserved by the registry

09-10-2003, 06:49 AM	THREAD STARTER #9 (permalink)
domdom NamePros Regular Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 206	ah not its not reserved, i checked whois , is some company in asutralia, drugs belongs to a new zealand 'e property' group maybe they thinkinbg will be worth soething i was thinking more about the name. sex.kids.us is not actually so bad if used correctly, most days after age 9 or 10 you get sex education in all government schools, maybe it is a site about the birds and bees, and dangers of aids, then would be quite beneficial. but obvious names like sluts, and other degrading words would be worse.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)