| | |||||
| ||||||||
| Dot TV Dedicated discussion forum for the .TV top level domain. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #26 (permalink) | ||||
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: internet@ctivist.com
Posts: 4,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/dot-tv/737628-talk-tv-40-000-a.html Differences do exist. .XXX and future .TLDs will all be private businesses - I doubt anyone will sign for a TLD if ICANN Is overly restrictive on pricing mechanics. Prices will be reflective of that business bottom line. The difference with .TV and .CO (to a lesser extent) is that they are independent of the marketplace and are in desperate need to understand the market dynamics. So the risk is 100% relative to the quality of advice they are given. They deserve to make money as Govt selling a resource - but they need help to avoid blowing it up. I firmly believe that changing premium pricing model is one thing and they have done it. One time up front fees makes sense.. but reversing the process to something more cost prohibitive is something else (and they simply cannot afford to do it). The competition from other TLDs will destroy them. I hope they get the advice. "Grandfathering" is something exists in just about every market/tax model in the free world. Taxes, in Germany, for example are not always applied retroactively - I see the same thing here as being the only potential issue... new premium pricing with current holders grandfathered in. It's all speculation but it's the same speculation I would expect for .co, .xxx etc. Not sure how much people trust the Colombian government, Samoa, Somalia, Cameroon, Montenegro or any other ccTLD. Open contracts ARE a concern. They should always be considered. Its the risk evaluation that changes and I don't see a huge risk at all. Reality is that Tuvalu doesn't have a whole lot of leverage - they need a vendor and no vendor is going to engage in a partnership where they lose money. Tuvalu is far more subservient to the market than people make out - they need Verisign (or others) more than Verisign needs them.
__________________ Anyone Seen Aggro? I can't find her anywhere. | ||||
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| NamePros Expert Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Excellent post John, and Greg makes a fair point too. Can Tuvalu lose their mind and raise prices 5x ? Sure. But they will be the loser,whether you like the new tlds coming out or not, they will provide some cool and interesting choices. Where before all these new tlds and before some cctld were repurposed like ME and CO. TV stood alone as the cool,brandable, super niche extension play. The point you made about Verisign is the #1 point, Tuvalu needs Verisign more than Verisign needs Tuvalu. I hope Tuvalu makes a fortune, but they need to be reasonable and understand there is a lot more competition than when they signed this contract with Verisign. |
| | |
| Post Thanks / Like |
defaultuser thanked for this post
|
| |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: yorkshire
Posts: 2,406
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Looks like there going to develop it www.talk.tv |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 965
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | I'm not sure this is true anymore...
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=737628 The Amazon cloud could run the .TV registry and Tuvalu could outsource, or import, any (additional) tech talent needed. This would give Tuvalu almost complete control, at cheap pay-as-you-go rates. They could charge less money yet make much more profit... and 'contract' issues hampering the extension would end. Besides, who needs a business partner that won't show you the books? | ||||
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: internet@ctivist.com
Posts: 4,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | All I was saying is that Tuvalu needs to outsource the management of the services. They need a service provider more than the service provider needs them. Even in your discussion you are relying on a third party (when you have reliance - the cost usually does go up ;-) )
Seriously? You want to run a registry from a service provider with some "tech talent"? No legal talent? No marketing talent? No infrastructure talent (maybe that's tech)? ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=737628
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=737628 I've worked for large companies - trust me, they don't tell you how much they are making from you as part of their outsourcing business. It's more than most companies would like to know and a lot less when the negotiation went south .. but then you just drop the contract. No idea what his has to do with Talk.TV which was a good sale.
__________________ Anyone Seen Aggro? I can't find her anywhere.
Last edited by defaultuser; 11-23-2011 at 08:34 PM.
| ||||||||||||
| | |
| | #31 (permalink) |
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 965
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 1). I know what you meant, and I agree. I quoted Ray who left out that point. 2). There is only one .TV, service providers are a dime a dozen, so to speak. Come contract renewal time Tuvalu will likely pick from a pool of providers. 3). Outsourcing is done because its cheaper than doing it in-house. Also, Tuvalu may well have some techies up to the job... I don't know. You speak as if you know managing a registry is beyond their abilities. SaaS (Software as a Service) handles the Naming Services et al. Whats more, Open Source software, with tech support, will get the job done. The software that runs the New Zealand (.NZ) Registry was open-sourced in 2004. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=737628 Domain Name Registry System - dnrs.net.nz Or, they could go the pay route and use services from VeriSign level service providers like SUN, or others that provide full spectrum Naming Services. |
| | |
| Post Thanks / Like |
defaultuser thanked for this post
|
| |
| | #32 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: internet@ctivist.com
Posts: 4,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Technically, I guess you could run most of a registry with a pencil and a pc of paper and a few emails. I was presuming they would want the same current modern infrastructure that allows premium pricing and multiple registrars with automated everything. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=737628 But missing the point of the OP. I don't think there is a huge pricing issue or ownership issue coming in 2016 because regardless of how Tuvalu manages the infrastructure the pricing has to be friendly enough to end users to remain competitive in a competitive environment. They are dependent on this money income - it's significant to them ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=737628 Thanks for the link on .nz :-)
__________________ Anyone Seen Aggro? I can't find her anywhere. | ||||||||
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Legend Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,355
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
__________________ Domain Hack For Sale: Buchare.st - Capital & largest city in Romania. Expires 2015, PM if interested. Top Rated Web Hosting | ||||
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lock of Justin Bieber's Hair Sells for $40,000 | the_poet | The Break Room | 8 | 03-07-2011 09:47 AM |
| tunisia.com sold for $40,000 USD | urbanhostonline | Industry News | 30 | 07-01-2005 01:43 PM |
| Hand Me the Remote Control! Robots.com Rakes In $40,000 To Head New DNJournal Top Ten | Duke | Industry News | 1 | 10-07-2004 01:36 PM |