Copied content bad for SEO? - Page 2

gjvblack · 08-22-2008, 12:07 AM

Copied Content would not only get you bad ranking but many users would consider your site as a "copycat" and stealing full content as yours and would spread your site a bad reputation. It is not worth it IMHO.

sb225 · 08-22-2008, 06:20 AM

then how about rss feeds ?
the same content displayed on many sites so whats the purpose for this

Gayan · 08-22-2008, 08:28 AM

Originally Posted by weblord

i know it will affect pr better read this one to avoid it.
http://www.highrankings.com/seo-plagiarism
that's the latest article that i know of.

Thank you weblord. No need to write for machines. I liked the article.

Originally Posted by dmi

Google can't stand "copied" content. If you put that kind of content on a new site, it won't ever get crawled (SERP's are going to be equal to zero).

????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/marketing-techniques/490308-copied-content-bad-search-engine-optimization.html
Any thoughts about PR and Article syndication? or RSS, as was asked in another post?

08-22-2008, 12:07 AM	#26 (permalink)
gjvblack NamePros Regular Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 276	Copied Content would not only get you bad ranking but many users would consider your site as a "copycat" and stealing full content as yours and would spread your site a bad reputation. It is not worth it IMHO. __________________ Online Security & Web Design

08-22-2008, 06:20 AM	#27 (permalink)
sb225 Account Closed Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 3,451	then how about rss feeds ? the same content displayed on many sites so whats the purpose for this Last edited by sb225; 08-22-2008 at 06:29 AM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)