I don't own a single pro domain. Most of my portfolio is .com. http://www.domado.com/list.php if you want to criticize me more.
That's an amazing assumption especially given I don't own any pro domains.
My post was simply pointing out that you are getting owned here in this thread. Campbell has your number.
I think .info is a good example. Because of cheap reg fees domainer flocked to the extension and then many developed MFA sites. It has good exposure and is often seen on the top domain sales list.
Now you name an extension that has been successful WITHOUT domainers. And you shouldn't count com,net or org since they were started before domainers was a word.
The success of mobi is almost purely related to domainers. Flowers.mobi generated an awful amount of hype. Everyone knows I am not a fan of mobi but for you to say that domainers can't or don't influence an extension is poppycock. You have no basis for that opinion.
You speak about people protecting their portfolio of pro's or whatever..seems to me it's how you think about your dot coms. Hey..I love dot com. It's king. Any fool with a portfolio should have dot coms. In the stock market every fool should hold some Dow stocks too but that doesn't mean he shouldn't diversify into penny stock or high risk a certain percentage.
You seem to be just missing some valid logical points made in this thread.
Campbell has even expressed he focuses mainly on dot coms. Where are you getting your assumptions from?
The statements here are basically that pro could use domainers help in pushing the extension. That's it. 6500 is meager. With domainers help they might reach 100k or more. I would say that exposure is invaluable to pro. Does it hurt dot com? No. Does it mean suddenly pro is worth a pile of money? No. It just means that pro won't be the pariah it has been to domainers. It might actually have a few good sites even. The law of averages just works for their favor. If just 1% of registrations get developed that's 10x more developed pro domains now that before. How does that hurt them?
btw...do you develop at all? Because if you don't then I can understand where you are coming from. Developer-Domainers have a better understanding of SEO and how extensions aren't necessarily that important. They also can take any name and make it a valuable site. If you're into parking..then you rely on one thing...type-in traffic. That's lame.
Diabro...read this whole thread. Figure out where you went wrong because someone you did.
EDIT: To add to my argument.
You make a perfect point. However it works against you. Your statement is circular. That means domainers are there if an extension is doing well but it's that circular mentality that domainers being there means it's doing well. You can't have one without the other. Your perfect world where an extension has large developed percentage with no domainers is out-of-touch with reality.
Reading your posts over and over I just can't understand how you don't make these connections.
You are going after Campbell for making dot com comparisons however he initially made very valid comparisons to dot info. You seemed to just overlook anything logical in this thread that you don't agree with instead using hyperbole to make your argument. We are more intelligent than that.
You don't have to like ice cream in order sell it. Point being that it doesn't take a believer to understand that pro needs domainers if it wants to make more money. I really haven't read anywhere in this thread someone heralding the coming of dot pro.
Personally I hope, with the lighter restrictions, they just use those to just go after adult sites. .xxx failed, but this is a chance to do the opposite. I see .pro as a tld with no adult material dedicated to professional business. Companies could open up the entire extension on the internet and not keep it firewalled. Difficult to police, but I think RegistryPro can do it. Again, imho.
Do you have any GOOD ones. I took a quick glance, what do you suppose your best ones are?
Actually what you are responding to does not mention .pro. I just asked if either of you had any good .com’s. I did a quick look at your portfolio and would like to know what you think the best ones are.
He has nothing but wishes and dreams. He speaks on the way he thinks things should be but does not back that up with any data.
I think .info is good but I am not sure how much success domainers have had in its popularity. It is just a good extension. It says a lot and would be attractive to many, many people. Do you have any data that proves it is more popular based on domainers?
I will use .com, .net and .org since the fact that there were no domainers when they started is precisely the point I am making. You do not need domainers to be successful.
You have no basis for your assumption. .mobi? Is it successful?
I am not trying to protect my .com’s. I just think that Campbell is making some big assumptions based on little to no facts and assuming things all to support his self interest. I would love to see more TLD’s be more successful.
I have no .DE but I think it is great that Germans have adopted it to the level they have. Same for .co.uk which I personally hate but it does great.
I am not sure that domainers HELP them. If you open up and domainers come in and register everything “good” then when actual end users come in and cannot find a domain along the lines of what they are looking for they may just settle for a substandard .com over a substandard .pro.
I see no facts to support your statement that domainer exposure is invaluable to .pro.
Actually I do develop for self use and friends. I just started parking some domains in March.
I know what you are saying about development but I have not seen any worthwhile development from you. If you develop a good .pro or .biz people will come. I agree 100%.
I do plan on developing a site within the next few months. I am looking into finding a good developer as I would like to try it from that side.
No, I do not think so at all. You have not posted many, if any facts.
But so is yours and Cambells as well. You both try to take .com out of the equation but the fact is that .com was successful before domainers and some would say in spite of domainers. Letting more people into .pro and lowering the price will not mean that it will be successful at all. It will just mean that there is another option for people to choose from but will also have a hard time finding a good domain name in.
I have not seen any proof from you or Campbell on how domainers make TLD’s better. Remember domain tasters and typo parkers are domainers as well.
If the point is just to sell a lot of domains then by all means they should open it up and lower the price. That is just one way to measure success IMHO.
Personally I like .us and .net. The fact that people do not pay as much for them as .com does not weigh too heavy on me.
Diabro, very simple yes or no question for you to answer. Did the domainer Rick Schwartz' purchase of Flowers.mobi for $200,000 in October 2006 help .mobi's development?
How long did it take for .com to take off? Is .pro going to be around for that long before more than a couple people know the extension even exists?
And what are exactly the Registry.pro plans to make the extension known to the world?
I believe that what .pro needs is domainers, and domainers will bring in with them developers, which will make it something else than a joke. It is fine to have desires to regulate the use of an extension, but barring the way of domainers is just misplaced control freakness.
__________________ ______________________________________ Time After Leisure & Events discussions Namepros auction Airfree.tv BIN $20 _______________ f o r . s a l e ______________
Diabro I responded to all your points 1 by 1 for 2-3 posts but if I did that every night I got home after 12 hours in the office or on a train I'd never get anything else done.
We agree on one thing. Given the choice, I don't think God would choose Kevin Ham as his web designer or merchandising partner. You know that story about the note Kevin got sent with "You Are a Piece of Sh&%" on it with a free sample inside, I heard God sent it after visiting God.com.
But you have never posted facts or statistics to back up your claims.
You have said "Would I be wrong to suggest that you are jaded and skeptical because you don't have any good domains?". I would like to see some of your good domains because from what I have seen neither you nor Lobroca have very good domains.
You have never really backed up anything you have stated in this thread.
Look at http://www.flowers.mobi/ it is a really expensive parked page. What value is that adding to .mobi?
I am done. I think everyone here knows the type of person you are now Diabro. Welcome to my ignore list. Just remember that the people you abuse on the way up are the same people you want as friends on the way down.
That is a shame. I was being nice and trying to make valid points. You came in and started telling me that I should give up, I had dug a hole and had flawed logic. Frankly you were pretty rude IMHO.
I understand if when confronted with valid questions, relevant data and links that you would find your position untenable. Just don’t get an attitude with me.
To answer Campbell’s earlier question, I do not think that flower.mobi added much if any value to .mobi. I will admit that it sold a lot of .mobi domains but I would speculate that a very high percentage of those are to domainers and like flowers.mobi undeveloped and sucking money every year in renewal fees. I in no way think .mobi will be successful in 10 years. On a phone people can use any extension and with the smaller keyboard you want less characters to type, not the extra one or two more characters that a .mobi extenstion brings over .com or a CCTLD.
.mobi is a bad comparison. But just like .pro it needs at least one big change to make it work. For cell users all "keywords" must first default to the .mobi ext, without that I'm afraid Diabro is right.
For me .pro has other uses than just being "professional", I can attest that Search Engines really do use the extension for searches as shown in my KeyPhrase list from Search Engines from my Ethanol.pro website stats. I posted this before so I'll use a shorter version.
pros of ethanol
pros of ethanol fuel pros of ethanol fuels
the pros of ethanol
pros about ethanol
ethanolpro
ethanol properties
ethanol pro
why people choose to produce ethanol?
pros of ethanol biofuels
people that are pro ethanol
properties of ethanol
pros ethanol production
pros on ethanol
ethanol in gasoline pro and con
pros on ethanol fuel
pros to ethanol
pros of ethanol gas
pro-ethanol
pros of ethanol fuel made from corn
ethanol gasoline properties
pro e85 facts
pros of ethanol for the environment
pro ethanol articles
pros of ethanol use
pro and con of ethanol gas for cars
pro ethanol
pros of ethanol plant
pro ethanol article
pros of ethanol
pros of ethanol fuel pros of ethanol fuels
the pros of ethanol
pros about ethanol
ethanolpro
ethanol properties
ethanol pro
why people choose to produce ethanol?
pros of ethanol biofuels
people that are pro ethanol
properties of ethanol
pros ethanol production
pros on ethanol
ethanol in gasoline pro and con
pros on ethanol fuel
pros to ethanol
pros of ethanol gas
pro-ethanol
pros of ethanol fuel made from corn
ethanol gasoline properties
pro e85 facts
pros of ethanol for the environment
pro ethanol articles
pros of ethanol use
pro and con of ethanol gas for cars
pro ethanol
pros of ethanol plant
pro ethanol article
Ben, wouldn't the .info extension still be better than .pro for this kind of site? I can think of uses for .pro but an information site may not be the best fit. I like the idea you proffered but I still think that even in the Pro life/Pro choice debate for example choice.info would be better than choice.pro. Maye it is my personal prejudice but the pro at the end kills it for me.
BTW, I did a search in Google on ethanol pro and "ethanol pro" and your domain was not on the first page. That does not mean it is worthless or a flop or not a valid point. I am just saying.
Ethanol.pro also seems to have a lot of space over the ethanol header word as well. You could prob cut that empty area down in half unless you are trying to get the adverts in the center of the page.
I will admit I am .com centric but I also really like .net, .org, .us and .info (I think .info is great for certain words/phrases/sites).
I have interest in some CCTLD's (I really would have some .TV names if they were not so expensive at first) and would like to see a well regulated and policed .kids domain. I mean .kids should be 100% policed and free of speculators and squatters.
.mobi, .biz, and .asia seem like bad afterthoughts to me.
This is all just my opinion of course and I am sure I have missed out on some markets and fads and am not the best businessman here by any stretch of the imagination.
Thank you for your well thought out and informative responses Ben.
"""Mr. Sigmar added, ''Our position all along has been we don't want to become an unrestricted, general use TLD. That's why we've developed the new Terms of Use Agreement.''
As noted in the published ICANN minutes, ''Registrants will be required to annually reaffirm that they are using the registration for the professional purpose as intended.''
The new Terms of Use obligates new and renewing registrants to do three key things: 1) self-certify professional credentials, 2) agree that their .Pro domain will be used only by them and 3) consent to use .Pro domains only in relation to professional services. As part of its commitment to ICANN, RegistryPro will monitor new and renewed domains to ensure that registrants adhere to these regulations.
Mr. Sigmar continued, ''We understand this is a major shift, and we encourage current .Pro registrants to contact their sponsoring registrars if they have any questions about how these changes impact them. Our priority now is to help registrants and registrars determine how the new agreement affects them, as well as educate professionals internationally about the benefits of the .Pro TLD.''
Plans are in progress to relaunch .Pro with a target date of July 14, 2008. """
You cannot kill something that is not alive. It sounds like they would like to make .pro a reputable extension. I am not sure if that will work but it seems they are purposefully targeting certified professionals. If this does in fact occur and professionals and the consumer do in fact recognize it they could be setting themselves up for success in the long run.
As an exclusive tld, that by itself would not hold it back too much. The biggest thing is the price. Can you be exclusive without a high price though? I don't belong to any exclusive Golf Clubs, but they are VERY expensive to join. Hopefully that is not the angle they are going for.
As I said before I hope they use this exclusivity to keep garbage out and only allow professional use, ie, no adult sites.
As for price we do need it to come down to get more development on these names. To do this I think we waste our time going to Registrpro. I believe our best chance to get the price down is this:
1. Petition OUR vendors, the BIG registrars, to pickup .pro. With Godaddy and others onboard THEY will need to go to the registry to lower prices so they can sell more names. They will have much more pull to lower the price. ie If you want a cheaper car you don't go to GMC's corporate offices and say, hey what is with these prices!? You go to your local dealer who works with the manufacturer to lower the price.
2. The more big registrars onboard the more competition and the lower prices we will see.
3. I've send my emails to Godaddy, but we need more pro fans to petition your favorite registrar as well. I'm sure as we get one we will see a domino effect and others will add .pro.
As far as the restrictions...
1) self-certify professional credentials - As a domainer/webmaster and member of DNOA I believe we are certified internet professionals.*
2) agree that their .Pro domain will be used only by them - Don't reg a name and then let someone else use it. If they use it for something non-professional you could lose the name.
3) consent to use .Pro domains only in relation to professional services - This one is the rule that keeps .pro clean. Sorry to those domainers that grabbed adult names in the .pro arena...I don't think you'll be able to use it. Also if you reg a non-adult name and use it for adult purposes you will most likely lose it as well.
*I know there are some holes in this logic.
Is a domainer, even certified, a professional?
How about a webmaster? Certainly there are professional webmasters, but does that qualify?
Only time will tell, but I still have a good feeling about this.
Obviously, Registrypro need to target certified professionals, but they have been doing this unsuccessfully since June 2004. The question is how to do this more effectively as a small fish in a big sea.
Registrypro receives about $325,000 per year in fees. I'm guessing Registrypro don't get much change from their reg fees after paying Catherine Sigmar, then they have to pay another 14 staff, office costs, and IT infrastructure costs. So presumably, Hostway is dropping $1m+ a year keeping the show on the road. That is probably a price worth paying in the short to medium term to control a gTLD, allbeit one in a strait jacket.
Catherine Sigmar was recruited in April 2007 and the ICANN contract amendment minutes referred to Registrypro "reaching out" in May 2007 so I'm guessing amending the ICANN contract was the key task given to her when she joined. That would tie in with her legal and consulting background.
I don't know what plans Registrypro have for the 14 July relaunch but if all they have up their sleeve is press releases and a reliance on more qualifying professionals being eligible to register .pro's saving the day, they will fail miserably. Registrypro will end up getting sold to a more commercially aware operator or Catherine Sigmar will get fired.
99% of .pro registrants are not using the extension as it was intended, by that I mean developed professional service websites run by government approved qualified professionals. Virtually every .pro is held by alternative extension domainers or domainer developers. Small holders are often not professionally qualified in the Registrypro sense but larger holders tend to be professionally qualified accountants or lawyers.
The alternative extension domainer is different to a standard domainer. They don't expect to make any PPC, they are aiming for capital appreciation, they will hold for the medium to long term. The domainer developer differs from a standard developer in that a developer would d