[advanced search]
NamePros Domain Auction
Live Event This Thursday at 6PM EDT - Prebidding open now
26 members in the live chat room. Join Chat!
Register Rules & FAQ NP$ Store Active Threads Mark Forums Read
Go Back   NamePros.Com > Domain Names > Industry News
User Name
Password

BQB.com - No Commission Domain Name Auctions
Forum Sponsor
BQB is a next generation domain name auction platform dedicated to domains of all extensions, specializing in domains of 5 characters or less.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-22-2008, 10:56 AM   · #26
labrocca
The Spoon
 
labrocca's Avatar
 
Name: Jesse Labrocca
Location: Las Vegas
Trader Rating: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,886
NP$: 2349.04 (Donate)
labrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond repute
Child Abuse Child Abuse
Quote:
Aren't you the guy who thinks CitizenHawk is the good guys?



And your point?

Quote:
Also, labrocca and Campbell do you have ANY good .com's? I would be interested to know if you guys have anything nice in the .com arena.



I don't own a single pro domain. Most of my portfolio is .com. http://www.domado.com/list.php if you want to criticize me more.

Quote:
I see people who missed out on that seems to be the ones pushing the other TLD's the most, to a point of desperation. They also compare those TLD's to .com a lot and those TLD's are not .com.



That's an amazing assumption especially given I don't own any pro domains.

My post was simply pointing out that you are getting owned here in this thread. Campbell has your number.

Quote:
OK, Since you say this and Labroca agrees with this in what alternative extension was developed BECAUSE of domainers on its side?



I think .info is a good example. Because of cheap reg fees domainer flocked to the extension and then many developed MFA sites. It has good exposure and is often seen on the top domain sales list.

Now you name an extension that has been successful WITHOUT domainers. And you shouldn't count com,net or org since they were started before domainers was a word.

The success of mobi is almost purely related to domainers. Flowers.mobi generated an awful amount of hype. Everyone knows I am not a fan of mobi but for you to say that domainers can't or don't influence an extension is poppycock. You have no basis for that opinion.

You speak about people protecting their portfolio of pro's or whatever..seems to me it's how you think about your dot coms. Hey..I love dot com. It's king. Any fool with a portfolio should have dot coms. In the stock market every fool should hold some Dow stocks too but that doesn't mean he shouldn't diversify into penny stock or high risk a certain percentage.

You seem to be just missing some valid logical points made in this thread.

Campbell has even expressed he focuses mainly on dot coms. Where are you getting your assumptions from?

The statements here are basically that pro could use domainers help in pushing the extension. That's it. 6500 is meager. With domainers help they might reach 100k or more. I would say that exposure is invaluable to pro. Does it hurt dot com? No. Does it mean suddenly pro is worth a pile of money? No. It just means that pro won't be the pariah it has been to domainers. It might actually have a few good sites even. The law of averages just works for their favor. If just 1% of registrations get developed that's 10x more developed pro domains now that before. How does that hurt them?

btw...do you develop at all? Because if you don't then I can understand where you are coming from. Developer-Domainers have a better understanding of SEO and how extensions aren't necessarily that important. They also can take any name and make it a valuable site. If you're into parking..then you rely on one thing...type-in traffic. That's lame.

Diabro...read this whole thread. Figure out where you went wrong because someone you did.


EDIT: To add to my argument.

Originally Posted by Diabro
This is pointless and circular. If they were getting developed and worth something domainers would be there.



You make a perfect point. However it works against you. Your statement is circular. That means domainers are there if an extension is doing well but it's that circular mentality that domainers being there means it's doing well. You can't have one without the other. Your perfect world where an extension has large developed percentage with no domainers is out-of-touch with reality.

Reading your posts over and over I just can't understand how you don't make these connections.

You are going after Campbell for making dot com comparisons however he initially made very valid comparisons to dot info. You seemed to just overlook anything logical in this thread that you don't agree with instead using hyperbole to make your argument. We are more intelligent than that.

You don't have to like ice cream in order sell it. Point being that it doesn't take a believer to understand that pro needs domainers if it wants to make more money. I really haven't read anywhere in this thread someone heralding the coming of dot pro.


Please register or log-in into NamePros to hide ads

Last edited by labrocca : 05-22-2008 at 11:26 AM.
labrocca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 12:03 PM   · #27
Ben42
DNOA Member
 
Ben42's Avatar
 
Name: Ben
Location: Chicago
Trader Rating: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,466
NP$: 197.00 (Donate)
Ben42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to all
Personally I hope, with the lighter restrictions, they just use those to just go after adult sites. .xxx failed, but this is a chance to do the opposite. I see .pro as a tld with no adult material dedicated to professional business. Companies could open up the entire extension on the internet and not keep it firewalled. Difficult to police, but I think RegistryPro can do it. Again, imho.
__________________
=========================
Ben42 is online now  
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 12:39 PM   · #28
Diabro
Account Closed
 
Diabro's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
Diabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by labrocca
And your point?

I don't own a single pro domain. Most of my portfolio is .com. http://www.domado.com/list.php if you want to criticize me more.


Do you have any GOOD ones. I took a quick glance, what do you suppose your best ones are?
Originally Posted by labrocca
That's an amazing assumption especially given I don't own any pro domains.


Actually what you are responding to does not mention .pro. I just asked if either of you had any good .com’s. I did a quick look at your portfolio and would like to know what you think the best ones are.
Originally Posted by labrocca
My post was simply pointing out that you are getting owned here in this thread. Campbell has your number.


He has nothing but wishes and dreams. He speaks on the way he thinks things should be but does not back that up with any data.
Originally Posted by labrocca
I think .info is a good example. Because of cheap reg fees domainer flocked to the extension and then many developed MFA sites. It has good exposure and is often seen on the top domain sales list.


I think .info is good but I am not sure how much success domainers have had in its popularity. It is just a good extension. It says a lot and would be attractive to many, many people. Do you have any data that proves it is more popular based on domainers?
Originally Posted by labrocca
Now you name an extension that has been successful WITHOUT domainers. And you shouldn't count com,net or org since they were started before domainers was a word.


I will use .com, .net and .org since the fact that there were no domainers when they started is precisely the point I am making. You do not need domainers to be successful.
Originally Posted by labrocca
The success of mobi is almost purely related to domainers. Flowers.mobi generated an awful amount of hype. Everyone knows I am not a fan of mobi but for you to say that domainers can't or don't influence an extension is poppycock. You have no basis for that opinion.


You have no basis for your assumption. .mobi? Is it successful?
Originally Posted by labrocca
You speak about people protecting their portfolio of pro's or whatever..seems to me it's how you think about your dot coms. Hey..I love dot com. It's king. Any fool with a portfolio should have dot coms. In the stock market every fool should hold some Dow stocks too but that doesn't mean he shouldn't diversify into penny stock or high risk a certain percentage.


I am not trying to protect my .com’s. I just think that Campbell is making some big assumptions based on little to no facts and assuming things all to support his self interest. I would love to see more TLD’s be more successful.

I have no .DE but I think it is great that Germans have adopted it to the level they have. Same for .co.uk which I personally hate but it does great.
Originally Posted by labrocca
You seem to be just missing some valid logical points made in this thread.

Campbell has even expressed he focuses mainly on dot coms. Where are you getting your assumptions from?

The statements here are basically that pro could use domainers help in pushing the extension. That's it. 6500 is meager. With domainers help they might reach 100k or more. I would say that exposure is invaluable to pro. Does it hurt dot com? No. Does it mean suddenly pro is worth a pile of money? No. It just means that pro won't be the pariah it has been to domainers. It might actually have a few good sites even. The law of averages just works for their favor. If just 1% of registrations get developed that's 10x more developed pro domains now that before. How does that hurt them?


I am not sure that domainers HELP them. If you open up and domainers come in and register everything “good” then when actual end users come in and cannot find a domain along the lines of what they are looking for they may just settle for a substandard .com over a substandard .pro.

I see no facts to support your statement that domainer exposure is invaluable to .pro.
Originally Posted by labrocca
btw...do you develop at all? Because if you don't then I can understand where you are coming from. Developer-Domainers have a better understanding of SEO and how extensions aren't necessarily that important. They also can take any name and make it a valuable site. If you're into parking..then you rely on one thing...type-in traffic. That's lame.


Actually I do develop for self use and friends. I just started parking some domains in March.

I know what you are saying about development but I have not seen any worthwhile development from you. If you develop a good .pro or .biz people will come. I agree 100%.

I do plan on developing a site within the next few months. I am looking into finding a good developer as I would like to try it from that side.
Originally Posted by labrocca
Diabro...read this whole thread. Figure out where you went wrong because someone you did.


No, I do not think so at all. You have not posted many, if any facts.
Originally Posted by labrocca
EDIT: To add to my argument.

You make a perfect point. However it works against you. Your statement is circular. That means domainers are there if an extension is doing well but it's that circular mentality that domainers being there means it's doing well. You can't have one without the other. Your perfect world where an extension has large developed percentage with no domainers is out-of-touch with reality.


But so is yours and Cambells as well. You both try to take .com out of the equation but the fact is that .com was successful before domainers and some would say in spite of domainers. Letting more people into .pro and lowering the price will not mean that it will be successful at all. It will just mean that there is another option for people to choose from but will also have a hard time finding a good domain name in.
Originally Posted by labrocca
Reading your posts over and over I just can't understand how you don't make these connections.

You are going after Campbell for making dot com comparisons however he initially made very valid comparisons to dot info. You seemed to just overlook anything logical in this thread that you don't agree with instead using hyperbole to make your argument. We are more intelligent than that.


I have not seen any proof from you or Campbell on how domainers make TLD’s better. Remember domain tasters and typo parkers are domainers as well.
Originally Posted by labrocca
You don't have to like ice cream in order sell it. Point being that it doesn't take a believer to understand that pro needs domainers if it wants to make more money. I really haven't read anywhere in this thread someone heralding the coming of dot pro.


If the point is just to sell a lot of domains then by all means they should open it up and lower the price. That is just one way to measure success IMHO.

Personally I like .us and .net. The fact that people do not pay as much for them as .com does not weigh too heavy on me.
Diabro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 01:23 PM   · #29
akcampbell
NamePros Regular
 
akcampbell's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (22)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 550
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
akcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to behold
Diabro, very simple yes or no question for you to answer. Did the domainer Rick Schwartz' purchase of Flowers.mobi for $200,000 in October 2006 help .mobi's development?

http://news.domainmonster.com/dotmobi_potential/

Last edited by akcampbell : 05-22-2008 at 01:31 PM.
akcampbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 02:03 PM   · #30
Diabro
Account Closed
 
Diabro's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
Diabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by akcampbell
Diabro, very simple yes or no question for you to answer. Did the domainer Rick Schwartz' purchase of Flowers.mobi for $200,000 in October 2006 help .mobi's development?

http://news.domainmonster.com/dotmobi_potential/


Respond to my points first. You keep trying to change things around to suit your points but your points are invalid.
Diabro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 02:27 PM   · #31
jido
Senior Member
 
Trader Rating: (152)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,155
NP$: 207.00 (Donate)
jido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond reputejido has a reputation beyond repute
How long did it take for .com to take off? Is .pro going to be around for that long before more than a couple people know the extension even exists?

And what are exactly the Registry.pro plans to make the extension known to the world?

I believe that what .pro needs is domainers, and domainers will bring in with them developers, which will make it something else than a joke. It is fine to have desires to regulate the use of an extension, but barring the way of domainers is just misplaced control freakness.
__________________
______________________________________
Time After Leisure & Events discussions
Namepros auction Airfree.tv BIN $20
_______________ f o r . s a l e ______________
jido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 03:52 PM   · #32
akcampbell
NamePros Regular
 
akcampbell's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (22)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 550
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
akcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to behold
Diabro I responded to all your points 1 by 1 for 2-3 posts but if I did that every night I got home after 12 hours in the office or on a train I'd never get anything else done.

We agree on one thing. Given the choice, I don't think God would choose Kevin Ham as his web designer or merchandising partner. You know that story about the note Kevin got sent with "You Are a Piece of Sh&%" on it with a free sample inside, I heard God sent it after visiting God.com.
akcampbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 04:48 PM   · #33
Diabro
Account Closed
 
Diabro's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
Diabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by akcampbell
Diabro I responded to all your points 1 by 1 for 2-3 posts but if I did that every night I got home after 12 hours in the office or on a train I'd never get anything else done.


But you have never posted facts or statistics to back up your claims.

You have said "Would I be wrong to suggest that you are jaded and skeptical because you don't have any good domains?". I would like to see some of your good domains because from what I have seen neither you nor Lobroca have very good domains.

You have never really backed up anything you have stated in this thread.

Look at http://www.flowers.mobi/ it is a really expensive parked page. What value is that adding to .mobi?
Diabro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 09:20 PM   · #34
labrocca
The Spoon
 
labrocca's Avatar
 
Name: Jesse Labrocca
Location: Las Vegas
Trader Rating: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,886
NP$: 2349.04 (Donate)
labrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond reputelabrocca has a reputation beyond repute
Child Abuse Child Abuse
I am done. I think everyone here knows the type of person you are now Diabro. Welcome to my ignore list. Just remember that the people you abuse on the way up are the same people you want as friends on the way down.
labrocca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 05:10 AM   · #35
Diabro
Account Closed
 
Diabro's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
Diabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by labrocca
I am done. I think everyone here knows the type of person you are now Diabro. Welcome to my ignore list. Just remember that the people you abuse on the way up are the same people you want as friends on the way down.


That is a shame. I was being nice and trying to make valid points. You came in and started telling me that I should give up, I had dug a hole and had flawed logic. Frankly you were pretty rude IMHO.

I understand if when confronted with valid questions, relevant data and links that you would find your position untenable. Just don’t get an attitude with me.

To answer Campbell’s earlier question, I do not think that flower.mobi added much if any value to .mobi. I will admit that it sold a lot of .mobi domains but I would speculate that a very high percentage of those are to domainers and like flowers.mobi undeveloped and sucking money every year in renewal fees. I in no way think .mobi will be successful in 10 years. On a phone people can use any extension and with the smaller keyboard you want less characters to type, not the extra one or two more characters that a .mobi extenstion brings over .com or a CCTLD.

Good luck to both of you, you will need it.
Diabro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 05:33 AM   · #36
Ben42
DNOA Member
 
Ben42's Avatar
 
Name: Ben
Location: Chicago
Trader Rating: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,466
NP$: 197.00 (Donate)
Ben42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to all
.mobi is a bad comparison. But just like .pro it needs at least one big change to make it work. For cell users all "keywords" must first default to the .mobi ext, without that I'm afraid Diabro is right.

For me .pro has other uses than just being "professional", I can attest that Search Engines really do use the extension for searches as shown in my KeyPhrase list from Search Engines from my Ethanol.pro website stats. I posted this before so I'll use a shorter version.

pros of ethanol
pros of ethanol fuel pros of ethanol fuels
the pros of ethanol
pros about ethanol
ethanolpro
ethanol properties
ethanol pro
why people choose to produce ethanol?
pros of ethanol biofuels
people that are pro ethanol
properties of ethanol
pros ethanol production
pros on ethanol
ethanol in gasoline pro and con
pros on ethanol fuel
pros to ethanol
pros of ethanol gas
pro-ethanol
pros of ethanol fuel made from corn
ethanol gasoline properties
pro e85 facts
pros of ethanol for the environment
pro ethanol articles
pros of ethanol use
pro and con of ethanol gas for cars
pro ethanol
pros of ethanol plant
pro ethanol article
pros of ethanol
pros of ethanol fuel pros of ethanol fuels
the pros of ethanol
pros about ethanol
ethanolpro
ethanol properties
ethanol pro
why people choose to produce ethanol?
pros of ethanol biofuels
people that are pro ethanol
properties of ethanol
pros ethanol production
pros on ethanol
ethanol in gasoline pro and con
pros on ethanol fuel
pros to ethanol
pros of ethanol gas
pro-ethanol
pros of ethanol fuel made from corn
ethanol gasoline properties
pro e85 facts
pros of ethanol for the environment
pro ethanol articles
pros of ethanol use
pro and con of ethanol gas for cars
pro ethanol
pros of ethanol plant
pro ethanol article
__________________
=========================
Ben42 is online now  
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 09:57 AM   · #37
Diabro
Account Closed
 
Diabro's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
Diabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by Ben42
For me .pro has other uses than just being "professional", I can attest that Search Engines really do use the extension for searches as shown in my KeyPhrase list from Search Engines from my Ethanol.pro website stats. I posted this before so I'll use a shorter version.


Ben, wouldn't the .info extension still be better than .pro for this kind of site? I can think of uses for .pro but an information site may not be the best fit. I like the idea you proffered but I still think that even in the Pro life/Pro choice debate for example choice.info would be better than choice.pro. Maye it is my personal prejudice but the pro at the end kills it for me.

BTW, I did a search in Google on ethanol pro and "ethanol pro" and your domain was not on the first page. That does not mean it is worthless or a flop or not a valid point. I am just saying.

Ethanol.pro also seems to have a lot of space over the ethanol header word as well. You could prob cut that empty area down in half unless you are trying to get the adverts in the center of the page.

I will admit I am .com centric but I also really like .net, .org, .us and .info (I think .info is great for certain words/phrases/sites).

I have interest in some CCTLD's (I really would have some .TV names if they were not so expensive at first) and would like to see a well regulated and policed .kids domain. I mean .kids should be 100% policed and free of speculators and squatters.

.mobi, .biz, and .asia seem like bad afterthoughts to me.

This is all just my opinion of course and I am sure I have missed out on some markets and fads and am not the best businessman here by any stretch of the imagination.

Thank you for your well thought out and informative responses Ben.
Diabro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 12:17 PM   · #38
Ben42
DNOA Member
 
Ben42's Avatar
 
Name: Ben
Location: Chicago
Trader Rating: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,466
NP$: 197.00 (Donate)
Ben42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to all
Well google takes forever and I have not even submitted it anywhere, nor do I have any back links. However yahoo seems to like it.

http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...-t-501&ei=UTF-8

I've always have had trouble getting ranked well with goog, but thats mostly me and my complete lack of SEO skills.

So far Ethanol.pro is just a bunch of junk thrown on the page. It really don't have a design at all...that, for me at least, takes a lot of time.
__________________
=========================
Ben42 is online now  
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 04:00 PM   · #39
Diabro
Account Closed
 
Diabro's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
Diabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by Ben42
Well google takes forever and I have not even submitted it anywhere, nor do I have any back links. However yahoo seems to like it.

http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...-t-501&ei=UTF-8

I've always have had trouble getting ranked well with goog, but thats mostly me and my complete lack of SEO skills.

So far Ethanol.pro is just a bunch of junk thrown on the page. It really don't have a design at all...that, for me at least, takes a lot of time.



HEH! I understand completely.
Diabro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 11:27 PM   · #40
WhoNet
NamePros Regular
 
WhoNet's Avatar
 
Name: Lee
Location: IDN Club
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 330
NP$: 435.00 (Donate)
WhoNet will become famous soon enoughWhoNet will become famous soon enough
Web Hosting Company Hostway .Pro TLD Reported Approved

Web Hosting Company Hostway .Pro TLD Reported Approved
22 May 2008

Quote:
Hostway Corporation, web hosting and managed technology services company, has indicated that ICANN has unanimously approved the the .Pro TLD.

Hostway has reported that RegistryPro, the exclusive operator of the .Pro top level domain (TLD) on the Internet, has received approval from the ICANN, to greatly expand the scope and availability of the .Pro TLD. The newly ratified terms of service increases the number of professionals who are eligible for the TLD, extends the availability globally, and streamlines the registration process.

Catherine Sigmar, General Manager at RegistryPro noted, ''This is a significant milestone for .Pro. By approving these changes, ICANN has given us the opportunity to open up .Pro to tens of millions of licensed and credentialed professionals and entities across the globe.''

Since launching in 2004, access to .Pro has been restricted to four professions: accountants, engineers, lawyers and medical professionals in Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States. Under the new terms of service, the TLD will become available to any professional or professional entity holding credentials from a certifying governmental authority anywhere in the world. These changes significantly broaden the market for the .Pro domain while still limiting the availability to professionals and maintaining the exclusive nature of the TLD.

In addition to the expanded scope, the new terms of service also makes it much easier to obtain a 2nd level domain and greatly simplify the registration process - thereby making .Pro domains both easier to obtain and more desirable.

Previously, stringent guidelines limited the availability of 2nd level .Pro domains (e.g. ''doctorsmith.pro'') and resulted in registrants opting for the easier to obtain 3rd level domains (e.g. ''doctorsmith.med.pro.'') The new terms of service eliminates the additional requirements for 2nd level domains, making these shorter, more desirable addresses available to anyone that meets the general TLD requirements.

The registration process has also been simplified. Individuals were previously required to submit written documentation of their credentials from an authorized certifying authority. These credentials would then be manually authenticated and verified by the registry - a process that greatly impacted the time and effort required to register a .Pro domain. Under the new registration process, the registrants need only supply the type of certification they hold, the name of the organization, and their license number on the registration form.

Per the published minutes of a Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors posted on ICANN's web site, the proposed changes to the .Pro Registry Agreement were approved by a voice vote of 10 to 0. These changes clearly remove the principal hurdles that have previously challenged the adoption of the TLD, but Sigmar emphasizes that .Pro is still a premium domain space for professionals and professional entities. In the interest of keeping .Pro focused on the professional community, RegistryPro is introducing a Terms of Use Agreement that every customer will be required to accept.

Mr. Sigmar added, ''Our position all along has been we don't want to become an unrestricted, general use TLD. That's why we've developed the new Terms of Use Agreement.''

As noted in the published ICANN minutes, ''Registrants will be required to annually reaffirm that they are using the registration for the professional purpose as intended.''

The new Terms of Use obligates new and renewing registrants to do three key things: 1) self-certify professional credentials, 2) agree that their .Pro domain will be used only by them and 3) consent to use .Pro domains only in relation to professional services. As part of its commitment to ICANN, RegistryPro will monitor new and renewed domains to ensure that registrants adhere to these regulations.

Mr. Sigmar continued, ''We understand this is a major shift, and we encourage current .Pro registrants to contact their sponsoring registrars if they have any questions about how these changes impact them. Our priority now is to help registrants and registrars determine how the new agreement affects them, as well as educate professionals internationally about the benefits of the .Pro TLD.''

Plans are in progress to relaunch .Pro with a target date of July 14, 2008.

Hostway Corporation provides domain name registration, web hosting and ecommerce, colocation, managed dedicated hosting, SaaS hosting, Web design and online marketing services to more than 600,000 customers worldwide. It operates state-of-the art data centers that reduce the complexity and cost of Web-based technologies for small businesses and large enterprises. Founded in 1998, Hostway is one of the three largest Web hosting companies in the world with a direct presence in 11 countries, 15 worldwide operation centers and more than 700 employees. Hostway franchises include: Affinity Internet, Bigstep, DiscountDomains, Hostway UK, Hostway Netherlands, Hostway Korea, Hostway Australia, Hostway Denmark, NetNation, PowerMedium, RegistryPro, Server Service, Service Over Internet, ValueWeb and WinSave.

RegistryPro operates the .Pro top-level domain (TLD), an Internet registry exclusively for professionals who meet specific eligibility requirements and undergo a verification process. All .Pro names are issued with a digital certificate, an online passport that facilitates secure communications and transactions. RegistryPro provides a new way for professionals to distinguish themselves on the Internet by using the .Pro extension. Initially offered to doctors, lawyers, accountants, and engineers, the .Pro domain name provides a solution for professionals who require heightened confidentiality and security in their online communications.


To learn more about RegistryPro, please visit: http://www.registry.pro.

For more information, please visit: http://www.hostway.com.
__________________
|Credit・Card.com| 乐.tv | 写真.tv | 销售.WS | 樂.net |Cell・Phone.com|
©|€.net|₡.com|₢.com|₤.net|₦.com|₭.com|₥.net|₮.com|₯ .com|₩.ws|®
WhoNet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2008, 01:58 AM   · #41
zuriko
NamePros Regular
 
zuriko's Avatar
 
Name: ZURIKO
Location: London UK
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 435
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
zuriko is an unknown quantity at this point
"""Mr. Sigmar added, ''Our position all along has been we don't want to become an unrestricted, general use TLD. That's why we've developed the new Terms of Use Agreement.''

As noted in the published ICANN minutes, ''Registrants will be required to annually reaffirm that they are using the registration for the professional purpose as intended.''

The new Terms of Use obligates new and renewing registrants to do three key things: 1) self-certify professional credentials, 2) agree that their .Pro domain will be used only by them and 3) consent to use .Pro domains only in relation to professional services. As part of its commitment to ICANN, RegistryPro will monitor new and renewed domains to ensure that registrants adhere to these regulations.

Mr. Sigmar continued, ''We understand this is a major shift, and we encourage current .Pro registrants to contact their sponsoring registrars if they have any questions about how these changes impact them. Our priority now is to help registrants and registrars determine how the new agreement affects them, as well as educate professionals internationally about the benefits of the .Pro TLD.''

Plans are in progress to relaunch .Pro with a target date of July 14, 2008. """

I think SIGMAR killing dot PRO, or am I wrong?
__________________
Link.pro Young.pro Broadcast.pro Contact.pro Keno.pro Picture.pro Rich.pro Management.pro Booking.pro--sold Tour.pro--sold Claim.pro--sold Claims.pro-sold Event.pro-sold Freelance.pro--sold
zuriko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2008, 04:39 AM   · #42
Diabro
Account Closed
 
Diabro's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
Diabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the roughDiabro is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by zuriko
I think SIGMAR killing dot PRO, or am I wrong?


You cannot kill something that is not alive. It sounds like they would like to make .pro a reputable extension. I am not sure if that will work but it seems they are purposefully targeting certified professionals. If this does in fact occur and professionals and the consumer do in fact recognize it they could be setting themselves up for success in the long run.
Diabro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2008, 08:12 AM   · #43
Ben42
DNOA Member
 
Ben42's Avatar
 
Name: Ben
Location: Chicago
Trader Rating: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,466
NP$: 197.00 (Donate)
Ben42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to allBen42 is a name known to all
As an exclusive tld, that by itself would not hold it back too much. The biggest thing is the price. Can you be exclusive without a high price though? I don't belong to any exclusive Golf Clubs, but they are VERY expensive to join. Hopefully that is not the angle they are going for.

As I said before I hope they use this exclusivity to keep garbage out and only allow professional use, ie, no adult sites.

As for price we do need it to come down to get more development on these names. To do this I think we waste our time going to Registrpro. I believe our best chance to get the price down is this:

1. Petition OUR vendors, the BIG registrars, to pickup .pro. With Godaddy and others onboard THEY will need to go to the registry to lower prices so they can sell more names. They will have much more pull to lower the price. ie If you want a cheaper car you don't go to GMC's corporate offices and say, hey what is with these prices!? You go to your local dealer who works with the manufacturer to lower the price.

2. The more big registrars onboard the more competition and the lower prices we will see.

3. I've send my emails to Godaddy, but we need more pro fans to petition your favorite registrar as well. I'm sure as we get one we will see a domino effect and others will add .pro.

As far as the restrictions...

1) self-certify professional credentials - As a domainer/webmaster and member of DNOA I believe we are certified internet professionals.*
2) agree that their .Pro domain will be used only by them - Don't reg a name and then let someone else use it. If they use it for something non-professional you could lose the name.
3) consent to use .Pro domains only in relation to professional services - This one is the rule that keeps .pro clean. Sorry to those domainers that grabbed adult names in the .pro arena...I don't think you'll be able to use it. Also if you reg a non-adult name and use it for adult purposes you will most likely lose it as well.

*I know there are some holes in this logic.
Is a domainer, even certified, a professional?
How about a webmaster? Certainly there are professional webmasters, but does that qualify?

Only time will tell, but I still have a good feeling about this.
__________________
=========================

Last edited by Ben42 : 05-24-2008 at 08:23 AM.
Ben42 is online now  
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2008, 04:30 AM   · #44
akcampbell
NamePros Regular
 
akcampbell's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (22)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 550
NP$: 0.00 (Donate)
akcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to beholdakcampbell is a splendid one to behold
Obviously, Registrypro need to target certified professionals, but they have been doing this unsuccessfully since June 2004. The question is how to do this more effectively as a small fish in a big sea.

Registrypro receives about $325,000 per year in fees. I'm guessing Registrypro don't get much change from their reg fees after paying Catherine Sigmar, then they have to pay another 14 staff, office costs, and IT infrastructure costs. So presumably, Hostway is dropping $1m+ a year keeping the show on the road. That is probably a price worth paying in the short to medium term to control a gTLD, allbeit one in a strait jacket.

Catherine Sigmar was recruited in April 2007 and the ICANN contract amendment minutes referred to Registrypro "reaching out" in May 2007 so I'm guessing amending the ICANN contract was the key task given to her when she joined. That would tie in with her legal and consulting background.

I don't know what plans Registrypro have for the 14 July relaunch but if all they have up their sleeve is press releases and a reliance on more qualifying professionals being eligible to register .pro's saving the day, they will fail miserably. Registrypro will end up getting sold to a more commercially aware operator or Catherine Sigmar will get fired.

99% of .pro registrants are not using the extension as it was intended, by that I mean developed professional service websites run by government approved qualified professionals. Virtually every .pro is held by alternative extension domainers or domainer developers. Small holders are often not professionally qualified in the Registrypro sense but larger holders tend to be professionally qualified accountants or lawyers.

The alternative extension domainer is different to a standard domainer. They don't expect to make any PPC, they are aiming for capital appreciation, they will hold for the medium to long term. The domainer developer differs from a standard developer in that a developer would d