[betthelot]

Originally Posted by tonecas

Namejet: ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/short-domain-discussion/429599-lll-com-sales-report-discussion-thread.html QBX(.)COM $2950 regards, tonecas

I know this will excite snoop to the point of climax - but before his cup runneth over, Tonecas can you confirm it by a link or page shot. If this is true I missed it; possible but unlikley.

[tonecas]

I knew this would spice things up

it was another sudden drop from Network Solutions that put the majority of bidders out of game. got to love NS.

only 9 bidders, so it may be called a glitch, or not




regards,
tonecas

[betthelot]

Originally Posted by tonecas

I knew this would spice things up it was another sudden drop from Network Solutions that put the majority of bidders out of game. got to love NS. only 9 bidders, so it may be called a glitch, or not ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599 regards, tonecas

Thanks for that - expect to see it at an auction near you.

[italiandragon]

Originally Posted by tonecas

I knew this would spice things up ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599 it was another sudden drop from Network Solutions that put the majority of bidders out of game. got to love NS. only 9 bidders, so it may be called a glitch, or not regards, tonecas

don't say that...please don't say that's a glitch or we'll have to read another page of his counter-posts

[tetrapak]

I can tell you that I'm in in all lll.com auctions at NJ, and I was not in in this one... Makes me wonder how I missed it, but Tonecas' explanation makes sense. Before you jump Snoop, I don't find it unrealistic to have a low quality sale under 3.5k, but not by $500, that's just too much of a difference.

[snoop]

In my opinion the market has weakened lately, another good example, ajz.com on the other forum, no interest with a $4100 BIN. In my view the minimum does look to be sub $3000.

[sdsinc]

Originally Posted by snoop

Now what happened to those claims by some here that LLL.com's would never fall below $3500 again.

Indeed that was 'cheap'. Definitely a buyer's market.

[gladdy]

IPO.com
$500,000
Sedo

[Acroplex]

gladdy - the mother of all LLL .com sales
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599

---------- Post added at 12:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:21 AM ----------

What really happened to the QBX auction:

The domain was not expired. If you check the WHOIS history you will see it was a placed auction. The problem with such short notice private auctions is that there is no built in momentum from potential buyers.

So the buyer got a great deal and the seller got screwed over

Now, this is an example of how bad the game has become with Namejet, mixing expired/pre-released domains with auctions with "fake" expirations. They should never put them in the same basket because the seller risks getting less money.

[betthelot]

Originally Posted by Acroplex

gladdy - the mother of all LLL .com sales ---------- Post added at 12:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:21 AM ---------- What really happened to the QBX auction: The domain was not expired. If you check the WHOIS history you will see it was a placed auction. The problem with such short notice private auctions is that there is no built in momentum from potential buyers. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599 So the buyer got a great deal and the seller got screwed over Now, this is an example of how bad the game has become with Namejet, mixing expired/pre-released domains with auctions with "fake" expirations. They should never put them in the same basket because the seller risks getting less money.

Thanks for the explanation. Given these normally garner 100 plus bidders, even if most are just monitoring rather than serious bidders, it explains why it went so low. As for snoop saying sub 3000 is the minimum that's just wishful thinking. QBX.com will be up at an auction soon to prove that.

[tonecas]

Originally Posted by Acroplex

What really happened to the QBX auction: The domain was not expired. If you check the WHOIS history you will see it was a placed auction. The problem with such short notice private auctions is that there is no built in momentum from potential buyers. So the buyer got a great deal and the seller got screwed over Now, this is an example of how bad the game has become with Namejet, mixing expired/pre-released domains with auctions with "fake" expirations. They should never put them in the same basket because the seller risks getting less money.

I think the domain was on clientHold which means that it had fake WHOIS information. Network Solutions in these cases is unpredictable when she will release the domain. The seller did not placed the domain on auction.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599

NameJet has its core operations rooted on Enom. Network Solutions is prone to "glitches" when it comes to communicate expired domains to NameJet.

On a side note, and to be fair, NS does not usually retain domains for herself which is becoming increasingly less common between major registrars.


regards,
tonecas

[italiandragon]

Originally Posted by gladdy

IPO.com ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599 $500,000 Sedo

aaaaaahhh orgasmic name

[tetrapak]

I also once bought a domain at NJ 50% under the so called minimum resale value that was set by domainers. Snoop would call that the new minimum, but it was just a glitch. If in the next 2 months there will be another sale at this price level, then I'll agree, otherwise I still believe ~3.5k is the bottom.

[sdsinc]

Originally Posted by tonecas

On a side note, and to be fair, NS does not usually retain domains for herself which is becoming increasingly less common between major registrars.

Actually I have seen them take possession of one domain (a LLL.com).

[gladdy]

Sedo sales:

lfw.com
8,100 EUR

msx.com
5,900 EUR

[tonecas]

another twist in this story: QBX(.)COM is now in redemption period...

regards,
tonecas

[gladdy]

lfw.com
$11,259
sedo

ylh.com
$5,559
sedo

exw.com
$4,800
sedo

[Chappy]

Originally Posted by gladdy

lfw.com $11,259 sedo ylh.com $5,559 sedo exw.com $4,800 sedo

Wow - prices increasing...

[italiandragon]

Originally Posted by Chappy

Wow - prices increasing...

We also need to consider currency value.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599

The USD has been dropping a lot again against all other major currencies and this can be seen also in the silver price (up 200 % in 2 years) and gold.

I think it's about time we add multiple pricing to at least the LLL.com

I would add at least USD / EUR / AUD since these are the 3 most swinging currencies among the top ones.

For help you can use : www.xe.com

[tonecas]

Originally Posted by tonecas

another twist in this story: QBX(.)COM is now in redemption period... regards, tonecas

recovered from redemption period and sold to auction winner.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599

you can place your offers now

regards,
tonecas

[Bravo]

spn.com

95,000 EUR

@ Sedo

---------- Post added at 09:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:19 AM ----------

ens.com

19,000 USD

@ Sedo

---------- Post added at 09:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:26 AM ----------

hxs.com

7,600 USD

@ Sedo

[Chappy]

Originally Posted by Bravo

spn.com ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599 95,000 EUR @ Sedo

Odd....this has been owned for ages by Symantec.

[Bravo]

Originally Posted by Chappy

Odd....this has been owned for ages by Symantec.

Sale source: Sedo recent sales RSS feed.

[tonecas]

Originally Posted by Bravo

Sale source: Sedo recent sales RSS feed.

the recent sales feed is buggy. I have seen sales that happened over a year ago. and it is not so unusual to see sales that happened a few months ago.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=429599

regards,
tonecas

[Finnerup]

nice!