NamePros.Com (http://www.namepros.com/)
-   Industry News (http://www.namepros.com/industry-news/)
-   -   iReport sold for $750,000 (http://www.namepros.com/industry-news/419689-ireport-sold-for-750-000-a.html)

ds2007 01-17-2008 09:26 AM

iReport sold for $750,000
 
here is the full story

http://www.dnjournal.com/lowdown.htm

dave9713 01-17-2008 09:54 AM

Wow thats one big end user! I never would have guessed iReport.com would have been worth that much.

Dave

smashfactory 01-17-2008 10:53 AM

i was waiting for that sale- cnn has been pushing their ireporter thingy

who has ireport.tv?

buyauthority 01-17-2008 10:58 AM

Nice paycheck now I wonder what eReport.com will sell for

yesonline 01-17-2008 12:49 PM

What does this "i" stand for in "i-report"?

Jeff 01-17-2008 12:59 PM

Originally Posted by yesonline
What does this "i" stand for in "i-report"?



Internet? :hmm:

Personally, I think the "i" and "e" prefixes are passe ... but that's just me and obviously CNN has something much different in mind, IMHO. :gl:
-Jeff :cool:

ajkula 01-17-2008 01:11 PM

Originally Posted by yesonline
What does this "i" stand for in "i-report"?



http://www.cnn.com/exchange/ireports/topics/index.html

What a waste of money.

kemjika11 01-17-2008 03:19 PM

i think this is a case of demand zooming past the market. Good day for the seller.

Pred 01-17-2008 04:01 PM

a motivated enduser with mega deep pockets.
a wily highly experienced domainer who doesn't need to sell and has very deep pockets.

both have an over valuation and opinion of the name.
all the ingredients for the perfect storm :sold:

why is Rick calling it a generic though. its a brandable and obviously this is the brand they want to run with.

well done Rick :sold:

worldstar 01-17-2008 05:51 PM

seems i are getting more popularity than e?

namewaiter 01-17-2008 06:42 PM

from day 1 ithought they should have branded it uReport ... could have been gotten much cheaper and makes more sense to their project

JAugusto 01-17-2008 07:35 PM

iReport is a TM from CNN now and Rick cybersquatted it up to $750k!
Only because he had the domain prior to them creating that feature.
Well done? I doubt it.

eReport is worth $750 (I know it because I have sold eBroklyn recently)
That tells you how fair this was!

MrRhee 01-17-2008 08:51 PM

Originally Posted by JAugusto
iReport is a TM from CNN now and Rick cybersquatted it up to $750k!
Only because he had the domain prior to them creating that feature.
Well done? I doubt it.

eReport is worth $750 (I know it because I have sold eBroklyn recently)
That tells you how fair this was!




you seem a bit misguided and/or jealous. just my opinion.

cybersquatted? how so? are you a fool? he owned it long before they even thought it up. look up the term cybersquat and stop lumping everyone together.

well done on his part? of course. how could anyone here be so jaded or jealous to not understand the art of negotiation. does anyone here think they could've held out for $750K? doubtful. very doubtful. I'm speaking from experience, it is very hard to turn down substantial offers when others would've cashed out long ago... but the payoff is well worth it if you hold out till the end.

congrats to Rick and CNN. it obviously was a win/win deal for both parties. I hope Rick can ignore all the naysayers and jealous domainers. sad to see the industry turning on itself.

it makes me laugh when people call Rick and others "lucky"... when most of you share the same dream... that some end-user with deep pockets wants your brandable domain and is willing to pay top dollar.


and for those trying to grasp the "i" concept... or understand why CNN wanted this brand... do some research on "citizen journalism" and how revolutionary it is becoming and how most media companies are choosing to embrace it versus battle the juggernaut that is citizen media. plenty of VC dollars being poured into that arena.


/rant

smashfactory 01-17-2008 09:09 PM

Originally Posted by MrRhee
you seem a bit misguided and/or jealous. just my opinion.

cybersquatted? how so? are you a fool? he owned it long before they even thought it up. look up the term cybersquat and stop lumping everyone together.

well done on his part? of course. how could anyone here be so jaded or jealous to not understand the art of negotiation. does anyone here think they could've held out for $750K? doubtful. very doubtful. I'm speaking from experience, it is very hard to turn down substantial offers when others would've cashed out long ago... but the payoff is well worth it if you hold out till the end.

congrats to Rick and CNN. it obviously was a win/win deal for both parties. I hope Rick can ignore all the naysayers and jealous domainers. sad to see the industry turning on itself.

it makes me laugh when people call Rick and others "lucky"... when most of you share the same dream... that some end-user with deep pockets wants your brandable domain and is willing to pay top dollar.


and for those trying to grasp the "i" concept... or understand why CNN wanted this brand... do some research on "citizen journalism" and how revolutionary it is becoming and how most media companies are choosing to embrace it versus battle the juggernaut that is citizen media. plenty of VC dollars being poured into that arena.


/rant





agree- this really has nothing to do with i or e names- this is what cnn chose to brand, and rick had the main course. good for him :)

Carlton 01-17-2008 10:55 PM

Originally Posted by MrRhee
you seem a bit misguided and/or jealous. just my opinion.

cybersquatted? how so? are you a fool? he owned it long before they even thought it up. look up the term cybersquat and stop lumping everyone together.

well done on his part? of course. how could anyone here be so jaded or jealous to not understand the art of negotiation. does anyone here think they could've held out for $750K? doubtful. very doubtful. I'm speaking from experience, it is very hard to turn down substantial offers when others would've cashed out long ago... but the payoff is well worth it if you hold out till the end.

congrats to Rick and CNN. it obviously was a win/win deal for both parties. I hope Rick can ignore all the naysayers and jealous domainers. sad to see the industry turning on itself.

it makes me laugh when people call Rick and others "lucky"... when most of you share the same dream... that some end-user with deep pockets wants your brandable domain and is willing to pay top dollar.


and for those trying to grasp the "i" concept... or understand why CNN wanted this brand... do some research on "citizen journalism" and how revolutionary it is becoming and how most media companies are choosing to embrace it versus battle the juggernaut that is citizen media. plenty of VC dollars being poured into that arena.


/rant

Good post/comments. As a domain investor, I enjoy seeing like minded people succeed. Rick has great instincts for domains. I think he has proven that.

ds2007 01-17-2008 11:39 PM

Originally Posted by MrRhee
you seem a bit misguided and/or jealous. just my opinion.

cybersquatted? how so? are you a fool? he owned it long before they even thought it up. look up the term cybersquat and stop lumping everyone together.

well done on his part? of course. how could anyone here be so jaded or jealous to not understand the art of negotiation. does anyone here think they could've held out for $750K? doubtful. very doubtful. I'm speaking from experience, it is very hard to turn down substantial offers when others would've cashed out long ago... but the payoff is well worth it if you hold out till the end.

congrats to Rick and CNN. it obviously was a win/win deal for both parties. I hope Rick can ignore all the naysayers and jealous domainers. sad to see the industry turning on itself.

it makes me laugh when people call Rick and others "lucky"... when most of you share the same dream... that some end-user with deep pockets wants your brandable domain and is willing to pay top dollar.


and for those trying to grasp the "i" concept... or understand why CNN wanted this brand... do some research on "citizen journalism" and how revolutionary it is becoming and how most media companies are choosing to embrace it versus battle the juggernaut that is citizen media. plenty of VC dollars being poured into that arena.


/rant




:sold:

szilla 01-18-2008 04:37 AM

Mr. Rhee...>>and for those trying to grasp the "i" concept... or understand why CNN wanted this brand... do some research on "citizen journalism" and how revolutionary it is becoming and how most media companies are choosing to embrace it versus battle the juggernaut that is citizen media. plenty of VC dollars being poured into that arena.

Mr.Rhee...right on in your analysis. This isn't about "e" or "i" names in general; it's about "citizen journalism".

Citizen journalism is a mandatory component that media companies must build in order to compete in the future.

akcampbell 01-18-2008 05:34 AM

I agree with both sides here. Rick was lucky that CNN knocked on his door for this domain in the first place because as .coms go in this price range it's unexceptional but he nailed the negotiations to get the price up to $750,000.

Selling a domain for a headline price is about reading what it is worth to a buyer and not just judging what it's worth outright. You don't just need balls the size of coconuts to turn down $500,000 for iReport.com, you need enough money in bank not to really need an extra $500,000 and presumably Rick was lucky enough to be in that position which is great.

I guess a bit of everything is required to pull off something like this - luck, money in the bank, negotiation skills etc etc. I say congratulations and can only imagine what a great feeling it must be. I regged Report.pro a month ago so grateful for the citizen journalism comments, that's good to know. I was considering letting Report.pro expire at the end of 2008 until I read this thread but it's a keeper now.

Charley 01-18-2008 08:36 AM

Originally Posted by dave9713
I never would have guessed iReport.com would have been worth that much.



End Users will pay anything to get them. IReport is a link on CNN homepage.

Toilet Monster 01-18-2008 08:48 AM

muahahaha, hope my iEar will fetch a similar amount ;)

Ronald Regging 01-19-2008 02:31 AM

The reason it is "I" and not "E" or even "U", is because "I" instills a sense of involvement and personal ownership among the audience. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to realize that the major media outlets are losing their stranglehold as more and more alternatives surface on the web. People are flocking to sites like YouTube and stuff in order to stake their own claim in the media arena from the comfort of their own homes. CNN is just hoping to create a project that instills this same sense of viewer involvement. This type of action may not stave off the inevitable decline as more and more people turn to alternative sources, but it does give them a huge advantage over their competition, provided it's properly executed.

A simple understanding of connotations goes a long way. uReport.com is a decent domain, don't get me wrong. But when I say it... "you report".. I dont usually refer to myself as "you". So in the back of my mind, its as if "you" refers to someone else... But if I say "I report", I'm directly addressing myself and this somehow validates my own personal involvement and participation. And it sounds powerful! *I* Report!!!

Now one can argue that given this scenario, iTube would have been preferable to YouTube. However, given the timing and popularity of YouTube, the overall appeal of the service and "liberation" it provided, far outweighed any trivial play with words... Though the media networks don't have those same conditions going for them. They're losing ground fast and have to compete against the stigma of an outdated paradigm which they created. People are tired of being reported to and things are obviously changing.

So in my opinion, that "I" alone was worth about 500k of the total price if not a bit more.

dalem 01-19-2008 02:49 AM

estibot values it at $130! BOOYAH!

DotUSDomains 01-19-2008 03:38 AM

And he also chucked in I-Report.com for free ?

Cant mind where i read this.

smashfactory 01-19-2008 10:28 AM

yes he gave the for free as to not hold up negotiations-
ronald regging- you are exactly right

exponent 01-19-2008 01:33 PM

Originally Posted by smashfactory
yes he gave the for free as to not hold up negotiations-
ronald regging- you are exactly right



I would have traded it for a donation to charity. It kills 2 birds with one stone by reducing tax liability and helping people at the same time.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 PM.
Site Sponsors
Advertise your business at NamePros

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0