hi guys
share your thoughts..
in your oppinion what is the most fast growing ext in near future..
thanks
share your thoughts..
in your oppinion what is the most fast growing ext in near future..
thanks
-
-
๐ Domain search now with sales history! ๐ฅณ
What is the most fast growing tld?
- Thread starter illidan
- Start date
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Right on.
This would also cover names that relate to the ext, but are not necessarily keyword specific. Aside from .com, (which has universal application), "how to", for instance, would have it's strongest fit w/ .info.
Excluding .com, .info would seem to be the tld that offers the broadest base of possible names fitting the exts intended meaning and usage.
Qwert said:
They were free up until mid 1995.
source: NameFaqs.com
But the internet was still in it's generalized "just a fad" view. Far different from the current .info give away bedlam which one registrar in particular Sipence (ala eNom) registered close to 1 million .infos in late September/2004:
source: Netcraft
I want to thank Sipence/eNom for regging these names on our behalves. However, as a member, I vote that they return all of them to the registry and allow us make individual decisions as to what .info's we would like to reg.
Man, it's dangerous to turn your back in these shark infested waters.
I agree there wholeheartedly.. the info's registered in "my behalf" weren't ones I would have registered as info's anyway!
Grrilla said:I want to thank Sipence/eNom for regging these names on our behalves. However, as a member, I vote that they return all of them to the registry and allow us make individual decisions as to what .info's we would like to reg.
Grrilla said:I want to thank Sipence/eNom for regging these names on our behalves. However, as a member, I vote that they return all of them to the registry and allow us make individual decisions as to what .info's we would like to reg.
Man, it's dangerous to turn your back in these shark infested waters.
Watch out for the fins at domainsatcost.ca.....they're also reportedly regging infos "on behalf of their customers".
i, initially, hated the idea "of registrars regging the .info version of my .coms" but since my initial reservations, i have sold the .com AND used the .info as a sweetener to the deal. in one instance, the buyer offered $500 for the dotcom and said he'd pay $600 plus all the fees if i threw in the .info. hp dayz.
And as enom promised, they handed it over, no fuss. [you have to activate them 1st, they dont sit in your acct until you do]
And as enom promised, they handed it over, no fuss. [you have to activate them 1st, they dont sit in your acct until you do]
- Impact
- 2
i think he was talking about .com's weren't you qwert?
- Impact
- 137
Qwert said:
I regged my first in 1996, and Network Solutions was the ONLY registrar. You also couldn't register live, you had to submit your choice and two alternates using an email template or fax. At that time, I believe it was $70 (or $100?) for two years registration.
Also about that time, very few people were on the internet, and it was mostly plain html text web pages coded by hand or using a tag editor like hotdog. the hot thing at that time was compuserve, prodigy, and third place was aol. The internet was mostly a big university or large company tool just made available to the public. Internet access was basically mosaic or something similar built into aol, and access to some usenet and long forgotten parts of the internet such as gopher, archie, venonica, etc. Compuserve email addresses were all numbers and decimals followed by the @compuserve.com.
...Boy things have come a long way in a short time.
I think the original question is somewhat unclear and confusing and thats why many of us have answered from different perspectives.
The thread heading says:
But the body says:
The thread heading says:
But the body says:
. Some of us have answered it according to the stats up until now, but some has paid closer attention to in near future and addressed the issue accordingly.
thanks for all who participate in
my question was about all cctlds and gtlds except .com .net .org all of us know that thats imposible to reg a .com or .org/net and sell it for a nice price that is another side of this career as you know(drop cacthing..)
look.. think that you have 100$(4 example) and you want to buy/invest on a domain as mentioned before it is hard to find a good .com domain then you'd invest on which cc/gtlds? .fm?.am?.sc..?.de...due to your professional experience which of them have chance to improve..
thanks
my question was about all cctlds and gtlds except .com .net .org all of us know that thats imposible to reg a .com or .org/net and sell it for a nice price that is another side of this career as you know(drop cacthing..)
look.. think that you have 100$(4 example) and you want to buy/invest on a domain as mentioned before it is hard to find a good .com domain then you'd invest on which cc/gtlds? .fm?.am?.sc..?.de...due to your professional experience which of them have chance to improve..
thanks
- Impact
- 32,443
I think the thing that really matters is what do 12 year olds know, the general public as a whole. THere are a lot of smart people on Here Collieri,mole,expire guy etc... But we all know this business the average person does not know .sc or .am or .tv and in a lot of cases .biz. SO that's what needs to be done educate and see a broader use of these tld's. I think personally in .info fits it very good. In the futute will A US company that can't get .com reg or buy .us? I don't know I hope. Good thread
Last edited:
illidan said:
All of these unfamiliar ccTLD's are never gonna break records but some real decent value can be obtained if the domain you are watching fits well with the extension. imho .fm is the least favorable of the ccTLD's as, really, unless youre in micronesia or like radio stuff then you may be barking up the wrong tree. And especially at that reg fee.
whereas .sc (already the chosen extension of 'whois') may also (eventually) sit well with south carolina (and Co's from that state have already regged under .sc), Scotland and southern california. And, obviously, the seychelles.
Good luck with whatever venture you choose.
Similar threads
Polls of interest โ
-
What are your strengths as an investor?- 186 voters
- 26 replies
-
What's your domain portfolio size?
- 464 voters
- 135 replies
-
How do you think a potential buyer first checks if your domain is for sale?- 510 voters
- 52 replies
Hot this week โ
-
The AI Domain Hangover Might Be Good for the Market- 34 comments
- 43 points
-
Hello Dominers. I'd like your feedback on my new project and some support.- 30 replies
- 4 posters
-
The Real Reason Most Domain Portfolios Underperform
- 11 replies
- 5 points
-
World.xyz Sold for $80,000; HealthIq.com for $30,999...- 11 replies
- 8 points
-
TotalRX.com Sold For $75,000 At Sedo- 10 replies
- 21 points
Hot this month โ
-
The $99 Experiment Is Teaching Me More About Domain Liquidity Than Appraisal Tools Ever Did
- 107 comments
- 52 points
-
Loading issues- 68 replies
- 7 points
-
AI vs. SI- 49 replies
- 17 points
-
WTB Robotics Domains .COM's Only
- 45 replies
- 37 posters
