View Single Post
Old 07-16-2008, 08:14 AM   · #9
MillersCrossing
Senior Member
 
MillersCrossing's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,256
NP$: 66.85 (Donate)
MillersCrossing is just really niceMillersCrossing is just really niceMillersCrossing is just really niceMillersCrossing is just really niceMillersCrossing is just really nice
Originally Posted by CarryOn
A, Yes, I noticed this acknowledgement that their ChannelMe.TV (me.tv) business model was a dud. As we all know they never put the resources behind this idea - in server uptime, customer support, etc. It was almost stillborn.

The journalist failed to separate .TV from ChannelMe.TV. Clearly the article's thrust was Richard and DM and not the nuances of dot TV and the natural organic growth of this extension.



couldnt have said it better myself.......except may be to say it was actually stillborn at birth.

And like you say there is no way a journalist without doing extensive homework in the arena of domaining and extensions will grasp the **** up on Channel Me versus the complete neglect of .tv


Please register or log-in into NamePros to hide ads
MillersCrossing is offline   Reply With Quote
Site Sponsors
Pimps/RPG Game Script Buy Flash Arcade Game Script Buy Flash Arcade Game Script
Advertise your business at NamePros
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.