u8l2

Originally Posted by TheBaldOne

u8l2, that specifically says 'this auction agreement', the auction agreement is not in dispute, what is in dispute are the actions of the vendor and auctioneer after the auction had completed. The present point is the 'right' of mTLD to void an auction after it has completed. The argument put forward by Sedo/mTLD that mTLD had the right to void the auction after completion has been shown to be totally erronous, mTLD had not and does not have that right even by the contract that they say gave them the right. As I said it is simply smoke screens by Sedo/mTLD.

Yes i agree, It can be written in any contract that this contract is null and void if we choose. Doesnt mean a thing! A contract is a contract. The auction did close the 2nd time. Everyone was notified of this including myself, and there were no server problems at that time. No mistake about that. I've gotten the same confirmation many times before from sedo. Do you believe the people that won there names and have paid for them have an excellent case that can be won, has opposed to the people that havent paid for there names thus not completing there end of the contract?

Please register or log-in into NamePros to hide ads

__________________
mobisitetrader.com develops.mobi