| | |||||
| ||||||||
| IDN Discussion Discussion about internationalized domain names (IDN's). |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #51 (permalink) | ||||||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Netherlands, Velsen
Posts: 297
![]() ![]() |
We still have some things to hope for - (in progress) jurisprudence in favor of IDN - (in progress) browser (input) support - (in progress) full idn support for email - (uncertain) DNAME Success still isn't guaranteed.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/idn-discussion/233411-and-for-the-idn-doubting-thomases.html On March 7, 2006, the Dresden appellate court had decided in the matter 14 U 2293/05 that a chain hoist maker may not demand that another party release the kettenzüge.de domain. It found no infringement under trademark law because the generic and descriptive term for chain hoists, Kettenzüge, does not qualify for a trademark. In addition, the generic use of the domain name does not constitute a violation of competition law. The unavailability of the domain name to a chain host manufacturer operates merely as an indirect disadvantage on the plaintiff's business. Despite the circumstance that the domain owner offered to sell or lease the domain, the court found no cyber-squatting, domainrecht reports. http://www.jurablogs.com/meldungen/2005/12/11/28093/ http://jurpc.de/rechtspr/20060089.htm | ||||||||
| |
| | #52 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: seattle
Posts: 130
![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 It reminds me of all those people who said that this e-commerce stuff would never work out because people don't want to shop online and non of the infrastructure is there anyway. It's so cute. | ||||
| |
| | #54 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,402
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Or perhaps there is some other more logical explanation as to how “.com” is being appended to users search queries? ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 BTW, 日本.com has OVT zero results. So does 日本.co.jp.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 You're making predictions for an entire nation, the world even, based on “good information” such as where you are “sitting” and what a few of your (uninformed) friends think. At the same time poo pooing “bad information” such as the fact that IDNs have been around for years. Now that's cute! Just because something is a “good thing” doesn't mean it will take off. Take VOIP for example. I was using it 20 years ago. It was great. It was tried in the mainstream every so often but never really took off. 20 years later Skype comes on the scene and suddenly it's all the rage. Is that because everyone in the world didn't want free phone calls for the last 20 years? Is it because Skype.com is such a great domain name? Is it because Skype does anything more than countless other previous products have? Of course not. It's because dozens of things all fell into place at the same time. There was no one single cause. It will be the same with IDNs. IDN support in IE is just one of many factors required before IDNs begin to take off. | ||||||||||||||||
| |
| | #55 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 665
![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 I don't care if you start reg'ing IDNs or not, that's your choice. I'm not going to sit and argue the point of whether having a native-language keyword is better than having ZGJ.in or QDK.us. But you have to admit that there is a common-sense element. I mean, just answer a few key questions: 1. Are there languages other than English in the world? 2. Do the people who speak these other languages use computers and the internet? 3. Do they advertise (i.e. - Do they maintain businesses that spend money)? 4. Are they consumers (i.e. - Do they seek out goods and services online to spend money on)? 5. Would they rather use their own language to navigate the web (the proliferation of native-language sites and ads would suggest yes)? There could be many more questions added to this list, but it all boils down to taking a less Americentric view of the world, and realizing that the potential for profit is huge. -- BTW, 日本.com gets 71 OVT w/ext and 164,031 without. It also gets 3,729 US OVT (without ext). | ||||
| |
| | #56 (permalink) |
| Account Suspended Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 741
![]() ![]() | dude you need to check japanese ovt. The .com does get ovt with extension. 日本.com 79 Also choose your battles wisely.. Comparing IDNs vs VOIP...... LOL Also I have seen some .jp's that have ovt w/ ext .jp is for general reg by anyone .co.jp is for companies |
| |
| | #57 (permalink) |
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Netherlands, Velsen
Posts: 297
![]() ![]() | I think he's right in saying "It will be the same with IDNs. IDN support in IE is just one of many factors required before IDNs begin to take off.", that's the plain and simple truth of the matter. I think however that these factors are a mere natural development following 8 years (!) of continuous development towards a technology that is so obviously needed to open the web for everyone, regardless of their language. The general trend is towards globalisation and the internet has been and will be the catalyst for that process, idn fit's perfectly in that trend. |
| |
| | #58 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Member Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
![]() |
2) It isn't a question of "need", nobody needs IDNs, just like 20 years ago nobody needed the Internet. Nobody is dying in the streets due to lack of IDNs. But it is a question of what makes the Internet a much better and more efficient place to do business and communicate for the 80%+ of the world that doesn't use English as a first language. It isn't any coincidence that ICANN's "Strategic Plan for 2007-2010" talks almost exclusively about "Internationalization". ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 http://www.icann.org/announcements/i...er-08sep06.htm IDNs are a big part of that. 3) As for why all the great IDNs haven't been eaten up by locals, well you could say the same thing about "great ASCII domains" in 1997. There were many many still unregistered that are now worth five or six figures. Why weren't they all "eaten up" by Americans? And that was when those domains resolved on 100% of computers worldwide. IDNs in most Asian countries still only resolve on less than 5% of computers. As it happens, many of the best Japanese, Korean, and Thai domains are owned by locals. And they know the value of what they hold, they aren't selling any for less than big money. General lack of interest from locals could also be related to the total dominance of the English language in the decision making bodies on the Net i.e. ICANN, IETF, DNSO, VeriSign. If they debated and published entirely in Farsi, do you think you would get excited in what they were saying, or even know about it? No, probably not. You would be one of the 99.9% of locals that found out about IDNs after IE7. Also, if Korean or Chinese or Japanese domainers were buying, selling, and discussing IDNs, do you think you would hear about it. Do you think they would turn up at NamePros IDN section? No, of course not. They have their own forums in their own languages which you are blissfully unaware of. That's the thing about languages you see. People like to talk in their own language, not one of your choosing. I do agree that IE7 isn't the only thing that is needed to get IDNs becoming accepted in the marketplace. But it seems remarkably logical that going from a state where only 5% of browsers resolve IDNs to potentially 100% is going to the event that will really get the IDN ball rolling. How fast it rolls and how big it gets, we will all find out in the next 12 months. | ||||
| |
| | #59 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,402
![]() ![]() ![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411
If IDNs were all set to take off people would be quietly registering them by the thousands, not trying to convince others to buy them.
![]() ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 LOL all you want. I'll just continue to LATWTTB.
The problem here is that IDN speculation presents an obstacle to this. Individuals and small organisations who can get by using hotmail instead of mail on their domain name aren't going to have the budget to buy names off speculators, which will stifle growth.
The other was uncertainty of the market. No one knew exactly where the market was going. In fact in 97 there was already plenty of talk about the dotcom bubble bursting. This same factor is affecting IDNs now.
I do, however, agree that publishing all these document in a wide range of languages would be a good step in the right direction. Compared to some of the things they waste money on this would be a small sum well spent. Even if everything was in a language I couldn't read I'd still be aware of IDNs. I was involved with IDNs before the standard was created. I worked with a number of the proposed standards, including some proprietary Asian systems as well as UTF-8 DNS. I supported the latter over punycode precisely because I didn't want to end up where we are today. So I can be pretty confident when I say I'd be aware of IDNs even if all the discussion was in Martian.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| | #60 (permalink) |
| NamePros Member Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
![]() | Very interesting about you saying you worked on "some proprietary Asian systems". I tracked them from the beginning. They just served to confuse the marketplace and were always doomed to failure. As for comparing IDNs to new.net, that is ultimately the worst comparison you could ever wish to bring out into the arena. Because new.net is exactly the same sort of proprietary "alternative root" system that was also always doomed to failure. Anyone can dream up another "new.net" or indeed any other "proprietary DNS system" supported through dodgy plug-ins and bribing ISPs and launch into the marketplace. But they always have failed and always will. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 IDNs have taken so long to a large extent because they are a real IETF standard, and that standardization process is extremely long and tedious. But IDNs are succeeding precisely because of it. It's very interesting you seem to think current registrants are just here to sell domains on to local companies: "The problem here is that IDN speculation presents an obstacle to this. Individuals and small organisations who can get by using hotmail instead of mail on their domain name aren't going to have the budget to buy names off speculators, which will stifle growth." Anyone with a brain has been buying generic IDNs that will create income through type-ins and search engine placements, not to sell on. I have personally never come across a search engine that asks whether you have email services active on the keyword you are targetting before giving a high placement. You need to re-think what IDNers are investing in. You also seem to imply that everyone buying IDNs is somehow investing in a "distant future" where they will start making money. Again, another illusion by someone not active, just watching from the sidelines. IDNs are generating income now. When IE7 is released Q4 (not 12 months time), they will start making alot more money. I love your comment about Chinese not coming into the IDN forum at NamePros. You are missing the point entirely again. If they were into IDNs, they wouldn't go to NamePros. They come to NamePros because of ASCII domains. NamePros has a tiny section on IDNs, and it is completely in English !! Of course if "random" people from the globe meet in a bar (presumably not in China lol), they will be force to communicate in English. But IDNs are about empowering people to speak to each other in their own language. If you go to a Thai bar in Thailand, people speak Thai. That is the IDN market. Local domains for the local market. You can sit there and raise objection after objection, and I'm sure you will, but those of us that own quality IDNs already know the true story. And by the way, if you were using VoIP 20 years ago i.e 1986, that's really amazing |
| |
| | #61 (permalink) | ||||
| Account Suspended Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 741
![]() ![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 anyways idnclub.com has alot of Chinese IDN sales. The forum is in chinese. I've also seen a large KOrean IDN forum on naver.com which is a major portal in Korea. Check every korean IDN. Pretty much each one of them was regged in 2000-2001 by people living in Korea. There are also a large number of Chinese IDNs that were regged years ago by ppl in China. Theres no point to post the domains here. You can whois some of the domains in those languages or others and find out for yourself. Again you're comparing two nonrelated things. New.net released propietary extensions not supported by ICANN. They were meant for the english language. IDNs are necessary. They aren't going to need a plugin. IE 7 final is weeks away from release. Windows VISTA is also coming out soon. It is going to be a critical update that people's pc's get updated with IE 7. Also many people already own a few thousand IDNs. Some of the top ppl on the IDN related forum (Not namepros) are from China and Japan surprisingly. Yep all it takes is a few seconds of observation and research to prove everything you said is just silly and baseless. Good luck with your .mobi's. All the top .mobi's are going to go the ways the top .eu's. They will be in the hands of the bertulux "TM" holders and corporates. The real investment right now is in IDNs which are .com's etc.
Last edited by DNWizardX9; 09-28-2006 at 03:27 AM.
| ||||
| |
| | #62 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 665
![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 This is happening now, and helping "dozens of things [fall] into place at the right time," as you said.
| ||||||||||||||||
| |
| | #63 (permalink) |
| Account Suspended Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 741
![]() ![]() | I would like to mention TDC (ITSYOURDOMAIN registrar) owns 30,000 IDNs. Register.com also owns many IDNs for themselves. JPRS just announced on their site that they are finally distributing the city .jp's and other reserved .jp's to their respective government bodies (in japanese characters). IDN .com and .jp should be hot in Japan. |
| |
| | #64 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: seattle
Posts: 130
![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 Please point out the exact place where I "poo poo" the fact that IDNs have been around for years. I never have. Do you feel some need to make up my words for me because my actual words don't give you enough ammunition? Let's have a little more consideration for what people actually say shall we instead of trying to make stuff up. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 IDN's have been around in testbed and out for years that's true but without browser support from IE - it is a worthless technology and you know that. Plug-ins please - be real! If you don't understand the importance of IE7 support you are merely slow, if you did know that - I'd think that this shows you are more interested in getting flamed then seriously discussing the prospect for IDNs to be adopted. So I know you have no reason to believe that I know anything the ordinary guy on the street wouldn't know so it is ok if you mock "where I sit". But where do I sit? and what do I know that would allow me to comment on IE 7. Perhaps I sit in Redmond? Perhaps I sit at? Anyway, if you check whois you will see that most worthwhile single word domains are already registered. In .com/.net many are non-Japanese because of the price and .com is what they gravitate towards. In .jp primarily they are regged by a wide variety of Japanese companies and Japanese (by last name anyway) individuals. I suppose they must be like myself uninformed and surrounded by ignorant friends! Cute! It's ok if you think so. IDNs may never take off - the possibility exists - but I'd bet my 401K that it will. Perhaps I already have....
Last edited by rhys; 09-28-2006 at 06:05 PM.
| ||||
| |
| | #65 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,402
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Now run out and **** over your oppressed brothers by taking all their good names and filling them with banner farms!
I like the idea of local language URLs for local markets. I think as long as people accept them as just that then you'll do fine. But if your looking to make serious money of PPC or speculation you've got a while to go.
Yes. Truly amazing, but not as amazing as the fact that something so useful took decades to catch on in the main stream.
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 [QUOTE=domainstosell]Many other factors are coming to fruition, including:
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411
Really. I appreciate the SEO value of the names, and I appreciate that some people are fiercely nationalistic about them. But you need most people to want them. Preferring them isn't enough. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| | #66 (permalink) | ||||
| Account Suspended Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 741
![]() ![]() |
parking pages huh? seems familiar to those with .eu domains and soon to be .mobi names.
Last edited by DNWizardX9; 09-29-2006 at 02:52 AM.
| ||||
| |
| | #67 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 665
![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 Second, please stop acting like you are above parking pages, or that ASCII domainers haven't given online marketing a black eye with made-for-adsense super-parkers like iReit, etc. You've never used a parking service to monetize names or turn pages into a "giant billboard?" Like PinkTees.com? Or ifcmall.com?
| ||||||||||||
| |
| | #69 (permalink) | ||||||||
| NamePros Member Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
![]() |
????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 I love the description of what it took him and his mates to get his VoIP solution going:
I'm leaving this "argument" because I don't like where it is going. Primacomputer appears to believe that Thais shouldn't speak Thai in Thai bars because it isn't "polite", and that this "foreign language on the Net" thing isn't really needed because all his friends speak English, how very neo-colonial of him. At least we got to the root of his position eventually, which appears to be the same root as all the other doubters i.e. "those foreigners should learn to speak English properly". | ||||||||
| |
| | #70 (permalink) | ||||
| NamePros Regular Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Netherlands, Velsen
Posts: 297
![]() ![]() | I can distill the following from your reply ; - you imply idn-supporters merely hope for broad support among internet users whilst the contrary seems to be true. - you imply that the aftermarket itself takes away the momentum needed to start user awareness and appreciation For the first "statement" I see nothing conclusive, because, as has been pointed out, there is no final user support, there is no or very little jurisprudence and there is no security as to the final form of the idn-extension, so quite logically there are no endusers. The reasonable arguments for companies to hold back are disintegrating slowly but surely and users are made aware of idn, slowly but surely. ????: NamePros.com http://www.namepros.com/showthread.php?t=233411 There is a firm basis for your second point of view, however I detect a slight irrational and somewhat socialistic point of view with regard to the "poor" people who see that there names have been registered. We're dealing with companies here, not with individuals, so it's not in the ownership but in the usage of the name, the user is annowed by yet another page with ads. I totally agree if you say that the (huge amount of) parking pages are detrimental to the value of domains and are in fact detrimental to the usefullness of domains in general, the best example I can think of is sex.net where you see a parking page with non-relevant ads. Development is key and will remain key to capitalize on our investments, for the sake of our wallets and for the sake of idn. [QUOTE=primacomputer]Long and tedious, you got that right. Actually, IDNs will succeed eventually despite the long and tedious standardization and the fundamental flaw in choosing a client side solution instead of making it a DNS solution. It will just take a long and tedious time. No. I'm well aware that most people are looking to just park them. My point about this being an obstacle to IDN adoption is even more valid in this context. Well I guess we'll just have to wait and see won't we. Just like we've had to do every year for the last 10 years. Don't worry. One of these days you IDN touters are going to turn out to be right. If only through the sheer statistical impossibility of always being wrong. Dude. There are Chinese here. Trust me. I don't know what you think about the Chinese, but they aren't nearly as uneducated as you make them out to be. I've got a lot of Chinese friends and they all speak excellent English. They can even use English to type URLs (gasp). Of course it was in China, and a number of the non-Chinese spoke passable Chinese. But as a common courtesy everyone communicated in the language people were in common most proficient with. English. Respect. Keep fighting the good fight. It was the complete disinterest in addressing the international needs of the Internet of NSI et all in that got me interested in IDNs 10 years ago. Having a level playing field is why I supported unicode DNS instead of the client side kluge that was adopted IDNs will be an important step towards towards making the Internet more accessible to the disadvantaged. Now run out and **** over your oppressed brothers by taking all their good names and filling them with banner farms! Clearly, we hang out at different Thai bars. I like the idea of local language URLs for local markets. I think as long as people accept them as just that then you'll do fine. But if your looking to make serious money of PPC or speculation you've got a while to go. It sure is! Back then. You couldn't just go out and buy a Skype phone to plug in to your USB port. We didn't even have USB. The original 8 bit sound blaster card was 5 years away. We plugged AD and DA converters in the paralel ports of a PC to digitize and reproduce sound. And the Internet was in no way ubituitous back then. I had to create bridges through half a dozen networks, x.25, TCP/IP, and whatever else we ran into. And of course everyone didn't have 10MB lines into their home like today. And we even didn't have the compression algorithms we have today that would have required a main frame to encode back then. We were encoding as fibonacci delta and stuffing it down a 64kb line. Yes. Truly amazing, but not as amazing as the fact that something so useful took decades to catch on in the main stream. Just waiting for you to tell me what I should be comparing. Or is there nothing to compare IDNs to but sliced bread? Please note. For the record. I do not dispute that there are hundreds of thousands of IDN .coms registered by speculators. I dispute whether this has any (positive) bearing whatsoever on wide spread adoption of these names, in particular their actual use. I want some of what you're smoking! How did you know I had so many mobis? You must be a psychic!
| ||||
| |