View Single Post
Old 09-25-2006, 08:08 AM   · #4
MillersCrossing
Senior Member
 
MillersCrossing's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,258
NP$: 66.85 (Donate)
MillersCrossing is just really niceMillersCrossing is just really niceMillersCrossing is just really niceMillersCrossing is just really niceMillersCrossing is just really nice
Sorry - ridiculous argument

Going with your theory of offering more for less - take cop.com and cop.tv - cop.com would sell for how much - $100,000, $250,000 - cop.tv is going for a negotiable $500 per year......which of these two names do you think will need to recoup their interest payments and quarter of a million investment more ?? And whom do you think will be helping pay off those payments and investment price tag?? Take a guess.....


Originally Posted by cosmicray
The problem with .TV is that the owners act exactly like landowners

with NO limit to their greed.

Say you have 2 competitors gizmo.com and gizmo.tv ...

Over time who do you think will offer their customers more

for less ?

Answer: the one who doesn't have ANY rent to pay.

Remember the better product doesn't always win the market.



Please register or log-in into NamePros to hide ads
MillersCrossing is offline   Reply With Quote
Site Sponsors
http://www.newwebdomain.com/ RealTechNetwork http://www.newwebdomain.com/
Advertise your business at NamePros
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.